arXiv++ Combinatorics

We study a matching problem between agents and public goods, in settings without monetary transfers. Since goods are public, they have no capacity constraints. There is no exogenously defined budget of goods to be provided. Rather, each provided good must justify its cost by being utilized by sufficiently many agents, leading to strong complementarities in the "preferences" of goods. Furthermore, goods that are in high demand given other already-provided goods must also be provided. The question of the existence of a stable solution (a menu of public goods to be provided) exhibits a rich combinatorial structure. We uncover sufficient conditions and necessary conditions for guaranteeing the existence of a stable solution, and derive both positive and negative results for strategyproof stable matching.

In many schools throughout the United States, it is customary to hold a yearly "Secret Santa" event. With the approach of Christmas, all the students place their names in a hat; each student, in turn, draws a name out of the hat, thus becoming Secret Santa to the student whose name is drawn. On the day before Christmas break, each student places a gift in front of the locker of the student to whom she or he is Secret Santa. Unfortunately, children being children, some students might forget to bring gifts on this day. Students who do not find gifts next to their lockers, feeling cheated, angrily take their gifts back from their recipients, who in turn reclaim their gifts from their recipients, and so forth. We analyze the distribution of the number $L$ of students whose Christmas is ruined, as a function of the number of students who do not bring gifts. We give a simple, explicit formula for the probability of every possible value for $L$ (backed by three proofs of distinct flavors), as well as closed-form formulae for its expectation and variance. Notably, we show that if $m$ kids forget to bring gifts, then the expected fraction of kids whose Christmas is not ruined is less than $\frac{1}{m+1}$ (regardless of the total number of students), with low probability for a large deviation from this fraction. The underlying theoretical results are applicable to the study of manipulation in matching markets within game theory.

We abstractly formulate an analytic problem that arises naturally in the study of coordination in multi-agent systems. Let I be a set of arbitrary cardinality (the set of actions) and assume that for each pair of distinct actions (i,j), we are given a number δ(i,j). We say that a function t, specifying a time for each action, satisfies the timely constraint δ if for every pair of distinct actions (i,j), we have t(j)-t(i) <= δ(i,j) (and thus also t(j)-t(i) >= -δ(j,i)). While the approach that first comes to mind for analysing these definitions is an analytic/geometric one, it turns out that graph-theoretic tools yield powerful results when applied to these definitions. Using such tools, we characterise the set of satisfiable timely constraints, and reduce the problem of satisfiability of a timely constraint to the all-pairs shortest-path problem, and for finite I, furthermore to the negative-cycle detection problem. Moreover, we constructively show that every satisfiable timely constraint has a minimal satisfying function - a key milestone on the way to optimally solving a large class of coordination problems - and reduce the problem of finding this minimal satisfying function, as well as the problems of classifying and comparing timely constraints, to the all-pairs shortest-path problem. At the heart of our analysis lies the constructive definition of a "nicely-behaved" representative for each class of timely constraints sharing the same set of satisfying functions. We show that this canonical representative, as well as the map from such canonical representatives to the the sets of functions satisfying the classes of timely constraints they represent, has many desired properties, which provide deep insights into the structure underlying the above definitions.

Lying in order to manipulate the Gale-Shapley matching algorithm has been studied by Dubins and Friedman and by Gale and Sotomayor and was shown to be generally more appealing to the proposed-to side (denoted as the women in Gale and Shapley's original paper) than to the proposing side (denoted as men there). It can also be shown that in the case of lying women, for every woman who is better-off due to lying, there exists a man who is worse-off. In this paper, we show that an even stronger dichotomy between the goals of the sexes holds, namely, if no woman is worse-off then no man is better-off, while a form of sisterhood between the lying and the "innocent" women also holds, namely, if none of the former are worse-off, then neither is any of the latter. This paper is based upon an undergraduate ("Amirim") thesis of the first author.