arXiv++ Combinatorics

We determine the strong independence number of the qualitative independence hypergraph, $3\text{-}QI(11, 2)$, using a technique that involves considering its vertices as subsets of $\{1,2, \ldots, 11\}$ and assessing them as intersecting set systems. This gives the maximum size of colour classes in any strong colouring and thus, a lower bound on the strong chromatic number of $3\text{-}QI(11,2)$. We leverage this bound along with an upper bound of the strong chromatic number of $3\text{-}QI(10,2)$, to consequently, establish that the covering array number of $3\text{-}QI(11, 2)$, $CAN(3\text{-}QI(11,2),2) = 11$ and give a sufficient condition for a hypergraph $H$ to have $CAN(H, 2)=11$.

Qualitative independence hypergraphs provide a useful combinatorial framework for analyzing the existence and structure of covering arrays. In this work, we study the \emph{uniform} and \emph{almost-uniform $3$-qualitative independence hypergraphs} $3\text{-}UQI(n,2)$ and $3\text{-}AUQI(n,2)$, and establish a structural correspondence between these families and merged Johnson graphs, with emphasis on their cores. Focusing on the smallest unresolved instance, $3\text{-}QI(8,2)$, we classify all of its strongly independent sets and determine its strong independence number. Using this, along with its strong chromatic number and the size of the largest $3$-clique, we show that $3\text{-}QI(8,2)$ is a core. For $n>8$, we further identify sufficient conditions under which $3\text{-}UQI(n,2)$ and $3\text{-}AUQI(n,2)$ are cores.

Two vectors $x,y$ in $\mathbb{Z}_g^n$ are $ qualitatively$ $ independent$ if for all pairs $(a,b)\in \mathbb{Z}_g\times \mathbb{Z}_g$, there exists $i\in \{1,2,\ldots,n\}$ such that $(x_i,y_i)=(a,b)$. A covering array on a graph $G$, denoted by $CA(n,G,g)$, is a $|V(G)|\times n$ array on $\mathbb{Z}_g$ with the property that any two rows which correspond to adjacent vertices in $G$ are qualitatively independent. The number of columns in such array is called its $size$. Given a graph $G$, a covering array on $G$ with minimum size is called $optimal$. Our primary concern in this paper is with constructions that make optimal covering arrays on large graphs those are obtained from product of smaller graphs. We consider four most extensively studied graph products in literature and give upper and lower bounds on the the size of covering arrays on graph products. We find families of graphs for which the size of covering array on the Cartesian product achieves the lower bound. Finally, we present a polynomial time approximation algorithm with approximation ratio $\log(\frac{V}{2^{k-1}})$ for constructing covering array on graph $G=(V,E)$ with $k>1$ prime factors with respect to the Cartesian product.

A covering array $t$-$CA(n,k,g)$, of size $n$, strength $t$, degree $k$, and order $g$, is a $k\times n$ array on $g$ symbols such that every $t\times n$ sub-array contains every $t\times 1$ column on $g$ symbols at least once. Covering arrays have been studied for their applications to software testing, hardware testing, drug screening, and in areas where interactions of multiple parameters are to be tested. In this paper, we present an algebraic construction that improves many of the best known upper bounds on $n$ for covering arrays 4-$CA(n,k,g)$ with $g=3$. The $coverage$ $measure$ $μ_t(A)$ of a testing array $A$ is defined by the ratio between the number of distinct $t$-tuples contained in the column vectors of $A$ and the total number of $t$-tuples. A covering array is a testing array with full coverage. The $covering$ $arrays$ $with$ $budget$ $constraints$ $problem$ is the problem of constructing a testing array of size at most $n$ having largest possible coverage measure, given values of $k,g$ and $n$. This paper presents several strength four testing arrays with high coverage. The construction here is a generalisation of the construction methods used by Chateauneuf, Colbourn and Kreher, and Meagher and Stevens.

Covering arrays are combinatorial objects that have been successfully applied in the design of test suites for testing systems such as software, circuits and networks, where failures can be caused by the interaction between their parameters. In this paper, we perform a new generalization of covering arrays called covering arrays on 3-uniform hypergraphs. Let $n, k$ be positive integers with $k\geq 3$. Three vectors $x\in \mathbb Z_{g_1}^n$, $y\in \mathbb Z_{g_2}^n$, $z\in \mathbb Z_{g_3}^n$ are {\it 3-qualitatively independent} if for any triplet $(a, b, c) \in \mathbb Z_{g_1}\,\times\, \mathbb Z_{g_2}\,\times\,\mathbb Z_{g_3}$, there exists an index $ j\in \lbrace 1, 2,...,n \rbrace $ such that $( x(j), y(j), z(j)) = (a, b, c)$. Let $H$ be a 3-uniform hypergraph with $k$ vertices $v_1,v_2,\ldots,v_k$ with respective vertex weights $g_1,g_2,\ldots,g_k$. A mixed covering array on $H$, denoted by $3-CA(n,H, \prod_{i=1}^{k}g_{i})$, is a $k\times n$ array such that row $i$ corresponds to vertex $v_i$, entries in row $i$ are from $Z_{g_i}$; and if $\{v_x,v_y,v_z\}$ is a hyperedge in $H$, then the rows $x,y,z$ are 3-qualitatively independent. The parameter $n$ is called the size of the array. Given a weighted 3-uniform hypergraph $H$, a mixed covering array on $H$ with minimum size is called optimal. We outline necessary background in the theory of hypergraphs that is relevant to the study of covering arrays on hypergraphs. In this article, we introduce five basic hypergraph operations to construct optimal mixed covering arrays on hypergraphs. Using these operations, we provide constructions for optimal mixed covering arrays on $α$-acyclic 3-uniform hypergraphs, conformal 3-uniform hypertrees having a binary tree as host tree, and on some specific 3-uniform cycle hypergraphs.