arXiv++ Combinatorics

The shuffle model of Differential Privacy (DP) has gained significant attention in privacy-preserving data analysis due to its remarkable tradeoff between privacy and utility. It is characterized by adding a shuffling procedure after each user's locally differentially private perturbation, which leads to a privacy amplification effect, meaning that the privacy guarantee of a small level of noise, say $ε_0$, can be enhanced to $O(ε_0/\sqrt{n})$ (the smaller, the more private) after shuffling all $n$ users' perturbed data. Most studies in the shuffle DP focus on proving a tighter privacy guarantee of privacy amplification. However, the current results assume that the local privacy budget $ε_0$ is within a limited range. In addition, there remains a gap between the tightest lower bound and the known upper bound of the privacy amplification. In this work, we push forward the state-of-the-art by making the following contributions. Firstly, we present the first asymptotically optimal analysis of Renyi Differential Privacy (RDP) in the shuffle model without constraints on $ε_0$. Secondly, we introduce hypothesis testing for privacy amplification through shuffling, offering a distinct analysis technique and a tighter upper bound. Furthermore, we propose a DP-SGD algorithm based on RDP. Experiments demonstrate that our approach outperforms existing methods significantly at the same privacy level.

The shuffle model of local differential privacy is an advanced method of privacy amplification designed to enhance privacy protection with high utility. It achieves this by randomly shuffling sensitive data, making linking individual data points to specific individuals more challenging. However, most existing studies have focused on the shuffle model based on $(ε_0,0)$-Locally Differentially Private (LDP) randomizers, with limited consideration for complex scenarios such as $(ε_0,δ_0)$-LDP or personalized LDP (PLDP). This hinders a comprehensive understanding of the shuffle model's potential and limits its application in various settings. To bridge this research gap, we propose a generalized shuffle framework that can be applied to any $(ε_i,δ_i)$-PLDP setting with personalized privacy parameters. This generalization allows for a broader exploration of the privacy-utility trade-off and facilitates the design of privacy-preserving analyses in diverse contexts. We prove that shuffled $(ε_i,δ_i)$-PLDP process approximately preserves $μ$-Gaussian Differential Privacy with μ= \sqrt{\frac{2}{\sum_{i=1}^{n} \frac{1-δ_i}{1+e^{ε_i}}-\max_{i}{\frac{1-δ_{i}}{1+e^{ε_{i}}}}}}. $ This approach allows us to avoid the limitations and potential inaccuracies associated with inequality estimations. To strengthen the privacy guarantee, we improve the lower bound by utilizing hypothesis testing} instead of relying on rough estimations like the Chernoff bound or Hoeffding's inequality. Furthermore, extensive comparative evaluations clearly show that our approach outperforms existing methods in achieving strong central privacy guarantees while preserving the utility of the global model. We have also carefully designed corresponding algorithms for average function, frequency estimation, and stochastic gradient descent.