arXiv++ Combinatorics

In the context of fault-detection problems, the objective is to identify all defective items among a set of $n$ binary-state items using the minimum number of tests. The {group testing} paradigm, which allows testing a subset of items in a single test, serves as a fundamental technique for efficiently classifying large populations. We study a central problem in the combinatorial group testing model where the number $d$ of defective items is unknown in advance. Let $M_α(d|n)$ denote the maximum number of tests required by an algorithm $α$ for this problem, and $M(d,n)$ denote the minimum number of tests required in the worst case when $d$ is known in advance. An algorithm $α$ is called a $c$-\emph{competitive algorithm} if there exist constants $c$ and $a$ such that, for $0\le d < n$, $M_α(d|n)\le cM(d,n)+a$. We design a new adaptive algorithm with a competitive constant $c \le 1.431$, thus pushing the competitive ratio below the best-known one of $1.452$. To achieve this, we propose a novel solution framework based on an unexplored up-zig-zag strategy and a studied strongly competitive algorithm.

An \emph{antimagic labeling} of a finite undirected simple graph with $m$ edges and $n$ vertices is a bijection from the set of edges to the integers $1,...,m$ such that all $n$ vertex sums are pairwise distinct, where a vertex sum is the sum of labels of all edges incident with the same vertex. A graph is called \emph{antimagic} if it has an antimagic labeling. In 1990, Hartsfield and Ringel conjectured that every connected graph, but $K_2$, is antimagic. In 2004, N. Alon et al showed that this conjecture is true for $n$-vertex graphs with minimum degree $Ω(\log n)$. They also proved that complete partite graphs (other than $K_2$) and $n$-vertex graphs with maximum degree at least $n-2$ are antimagic. Recently, Wang showed that the toroidal grids (the Cartesian products of two or more cycles) are antimagic. Two open problems left in Wang's paper are about the antimagicness of lattice grid graphs and prism graphs, which are the Cartesian products of two paths, and of a cycle and a path, respectively. In this article, we prove that these two classes of graphs are antimagic, by constructing such antimagic labelings.

An \emph{antimagic labeling} of a finite undirected simple graph with $m$ edges and $n$ vertices is a bijection from the set of edges to the integers $1,...,m$ such that all $n$ vertex sums are pairwise distinct, where a vertex sum is the sum of labels of all edges incident with the same vertex. A graph is called \emph{antimagic} if it has an antimagic labeling. In 1990, Hartsfield and Ringel \cite{HaRi} conjectured that every simple connected graph, but $K_2$, is antimagic. In this article, we prove that a new class of Cartesian product graphs are antimagic. In addition, by combining this result and the antimagicness result on toroidal grids (Cartesian products of two cycles) in \cite{Wan}, all Cartesian products of two or more regular graphs can be proved to be antimagic.