arXiv++ Combinatorics

A weakly optimal $K_s$-free $(n,d,λ)$-graph is a $d$-regular $K_s$-free graph on $n$ vertices with $d=Θ(n^{1-α})$ and spectral expansion $λ=Θ(n^{1-(s-1)α})$, for some fixed $α>0$. Such a graph is called optimal if additionally $α= \frac{1}{2s-3}$. We prove that if $s_{1},\ldots,s_{k}\ge3$ are fixed positive integers and weakly optimal $K_{s_{i}}$-free pseudorandom graphs exist for each $1\le i\le k$, then the multicolor Ramsey numbers satisfy \[ Ω\Big(\frac{t^{S+1}}{\log^{2S}t}\Big)\le r(s_{1},\ldots,s_{k},t)\le O\Big(\frac{t^{S+1}}{\log^{S}t}\Big), \] as $t\rightarrow\infty$, where $S=\sum_{i=1}^{k}(s_{i}-2)$. This generalizes previous results of Mubayi and Verstraëte, who proved the case $k=1$, and Alon and Rödl, who proved the case $s_1=\cdots = s_k = 3$. Both previous results used the existence of optimal rather than weakly optimal $K_{s_i}$-free graphs.

Extending a recent breakthrough of Shitov, we prove that the chromatic number of the tensor product of two graphs can be a constant factor smaller than the minimum chromatic number of the two graphs. More precisely, we prove that there exists an absolute constant $δ>0$ such that for all $c$ sufficiently large, there exist graphs $G$ and $H$ with chromatic number at least $(1+δ)c$ for which $χ(G \times H) \le c$.

We introduce a graph Ramsey game called Ramsey, Paper, Scissors. This game has two players, Proposer and Decider. Starting from an empty graph on $n$ vertices, on each turn Proposer proposes a potential edge and Decider simultaneously decides (without knowing Proposer's choice) whether to add it to the graph. Proposer cannot propose an edge which would create a triangle in the graph. The game ends when Proposer has no legal moves remaining, and Proposer wins if the final graph has independence number at least $s$. We prove a threshold phenomenon exists for this game by exhibiting randomized strategies for both players that are optimal up to constants. Namely, there exist constants $0<A<B$ such that (under optimal play) Proposer wins with high probability if $s<A\sqrt{n}\log{n}$, while Decider wins with high probability if $s>B\sqrt{n}\log{n}$. This is a factor of $Θ(\sqrt{\log{n}})$ larger than the lower bound coming from the off-diagonal Ramsey number $r(3,s)$.