arXiv++ Combinatorics

The classical existence result of Nash guarantees that every finite noncooperative game admits an equilibrium in mixed strategies, but it leaves open the question of when pure strategy equilibria exist. This paper develops a structural approach to that question by exploiting properties of the best-response correspondence on finite strategy sets. Building on recent work, we derive new sufficient conditions for the existence of pure strategy Nash equilibria in finite games. We introduce several broad classes of finite games for which pure equilibria are guaranteed, including a class that generalizes unilaterally competitive games and a class characterized by the existence of an aggregate-payoff maximizer over an ordered set. Our results clarify the role of acyclicity, and aggregation in producing pure equilibria and connect disparate sufficient-condition results in the literature into a unified framework.

We give a brief exposition of a result of Song, Nguyen, and Lin (2026) that every election (with ranked preferences) has a Condorcet winning set of at most five candidates.

A group of individuals wishes to classify $m$ objects into $n$ categories in such a way that no class is left empty, a condition known as surjectivity. The opinions of the individuals are aggregated separately for each object using an aggregation function that can depend on the object. Maniquet and Mongin showed that if the aggregation functions are unanimous and the outcome must always be surjective, then the aggregation mechanism is dictatorial. Cailloux et al. showed that the same holds even if unanimity is relaxed to citizen sovereignty (each object can be classified into any category). We show that similar results hold even if we only require the outcome to be surjective with probability $1-ε$ (with respect to an arbitrary symmetric i.i.d. distribution), provided that the aggregation functions are far from being constant. On the way, we characterize all aggregation mechanisms whose outcome is always surjective without any assumptions on the aggregation functions. Our approach uses a general result of Alekseev and Filmus which has wider applicability. We illustrate this by proving a similar impossibility result for aggregating equivalence relations.

Quantile shares, introduced by Babichenko, Feldman, Holzman, and Narayan [STOC 2024], offer an ordinal, self-maximizing, and interpretable benchmark for fair division of indivisible goods, but their universal feasibility is known only conditional on the rainbow Erdős matching conjecture (EMC). Specifically, Babichenko et al. showed that assuming the rainbow EMC in the near-perfect matching regime, the $(1/2e)$-quantile share is universally feasible. In contrast, a simple argument shows that the $q$-quantile share can be infeasible for any $q > 1/e$. We introduce a one-parameter refinement of quantile shares, the $c$-thinned quantile share, obtained by thinning the inclusion probability in the random benchmark bundle by a factor of $c$ for a fixed constant $c\in(0,1]$. Our main result is that there exists a universal constant $c >0$ for which the $c$-thinned $e^{-c}$-quantile share is unconditionally universally feasible; this is best possible in the sense that for any $c \in (0,1]$, the $c$-thinned $q$-quantile share can be infeasible for any $q > e^{-c}$. Prior to this work, the only nontrivial share known to be universally feasible was Feige's residual maximin share. The thinning viewpoint also lets us remove the factor-two loss in the conditional result for the original quantile share: assuming the rainbow EMC, the $(1/e)$-quantile share is universally feasible.

The holiday gift exchange game is a familiar social institution with nontrivial strategic structure. We provide a formal treatment of the game's mechanics, defining the state space, action sets, and the recursive structure of stealing chains; we prove termination and derive an algorithm for counting distinct game trajectories, which grow far faster than the space of possible final allocations. Beyond the base mechanics, we introduce a decorated model incorporating partial information, social costs, and adaptive strategies grounded in discrete choice theory and the frustration-aggression literature. A full factorial simulation of 240,000 games yields three findings of note: implicit social costs are the dominant regulator of aggression, reducing stealing by 27--48\% and outweighing both uncertainty and strategic sophistication; partial information, contrary to expectation, slightly increases stealing through asymmetric uncertainty; correlated valuations amplify every behavioral effect, so that consensus about gift quality, rather than the features themselves, is what intensifies competition. The first-player advantage is robust across all conditions.

In the paper it is proven that the two-players turn-based stochastic game "Risk or Safety" has a unique solution. Both players need to play the same strategy if they want to maximize their winning chances. An analytical method based on the transition equations depending on the players decisions at each game situation is presented. However, the method requires the solution of many large linear equation systems, which makes the problem practically unsolvable for more than 6 coins. Hence, an iterative method is used to determine the optimal strategy for up to 20 coins. A look-up table gives the number of coins a player should toss at each possible game situation.

There is a set of n indivisible items (or chores), and a set of n players. Each day, a single item should be assigned to each player. We want to ensure that all players feel that they have been treated fairly, not only after the last day, but after every single day. We present two 'balance' conditions on sequences of permutations. One condition can always be satisfied, but is arguably too weak; a second condition is strong, and can be satisfied for all n <= 11, but cannot be satisfied for some larger values of n, including all n>61. We then relate the 'balance' condition to the requirement that the cumulative assignment is proportional up to one item (PROP1), where proportionality holds in a strong ordinal sense -- for every valuations that are consistent with the item ranking. We present a third balance condition that implies ordinal PROP1. We show that a sequence guaranteeing this balance condition exists for all n <= 12, but might not exist when n=6k for any k >= 19. Finally, we present a fourth, weaker balance condition on a sequence, that guarantees ordinal proportionality up to two items (PROP2). Whether or not this condition can be satisfied for all n remains an open question.

Quint and Shubik (1997) conjectured that a non-degenerate n-by-n game has at most 2^n-1 Nash equilibria in mixed strategies. The conjecture is true for n at most 4 but false for n=6 or larger. We answer it positively for the remaining case n=5, which had been open since 1999. The problem can be translated to a combinatorial question about the vertices of a pair of simple n-polytopes with 2n facets. We introduce a novel obstruction based on the index of an equilibrium, which states that equilibrium vertices belong to two equal-sized disjoint stable sets of the graph of the polytope. This bound is verified directly using the known classification of the 159,375 combinatorial types of dual neighborly polytopes in dimension 5 with 10 facets. Non-neighborly polytopes are analyzed with additional combinatorial techniques where the bound is used for their disjoint facets.