arXiv++ Combinatorics

A simplicial complex K is called d-representable if it is the nerve of a collection of convex sets in R^d; K is d-collapsible if it can be reduced to an empty complex by repeatedly removing a face of dimension at most d-1 that is contained in a unique maximal face; and K is d-Leray if every induced subcomplex of K has vanishing homology of dimension d and larger. It is known that d-representable implies d-collapsible implies d-Leray, and no two of these notions coincide for d greater or equal to 2. The famous Helly theorem and other important results in discrete geometry can be regarded as results about d-representable complexes, and in many of these results "d-representable" in the assumption can be replaced by "d-collapsible" or even "d-Leray". We investigate "dimension gaps" among these notions, and we construct, for all positive integers d, a 2d-Leray complex that is not (3d-1)-collapsible and a d-collapsible complex that is not (2d-2)-representable. In the proofs we obtain two results of independent interest: (i) The nerve of every finite family of sets, each of size at most d, is d-collapsible. (ii) If the nerve of a simplicial complex K is d-representable, then K embeds in R^d.

We prove a new fractional Helly theorem for families of sets obeying topological conditions. More precisely, we show that the nerve of a finite family of open sets (and of subcomplexes of cell complexes) in R^d is k-Leray where k depends on the dimension d and the homological intersection complexity of the family. This implies fractional Helly number k+1 for families F. Moreover, we obtain a topological (p,q)-theorem. Our result contains the (p,q)-theorem for good covers of Alon, Kalai, Matousek, and Meshulam (2003) as a special case. The proof uses a spectral sequence argument. The same method is then used to reprove a homological version of a nerve theorem of Bjoerner.