arXiv++ Combinatorics

Browse math.CO papers from arXiv

An example showing that Schrijver's $\vartheta$-function need not upper bound the Shannon capacity of a graph

Published: 2025-05-12 | Updated: 2025-07-02
Comments: https://www.aimspress.com/article/doi/10.3934/math.2025685
Journal: AIMS Mathematics, vol. 10, no. 7, paper 685, pp. 15294--15301, July 2025

Abstract

This letter addresses an open question concerning a variant of the Lovász $\vartheta$ function, which was introduced by Schrijver and independently by McEliece et al. (1978). The question of whether this variant provides an upper bound on the Shannon capacity of a graph was explicitly stated by Bi and Tang (2019). This letter presents an explicit example of a Tanner graph on 32 vertices, which shows that, in contrast to the Lovász $\vartheta$ function, this variant does not necessarily upper bound the Shannon capacity of a graph. The example, previously outlined by the author in a recent paper (2024), is presented here in full detail, making it easy to follow and verify. By resolving this question, the note clarifies a subtle but significant distinction between these two closely related graph invariants.

BibTeX

Loading...