arXiv++ Combinatorics

Browse math.CO papers from arXiv

Modularity from $q$-series

Published: 2025-09-24 | Updated: 2025-11-29
Comments: Revised with referee feedback. Theorems unchanged. New Proof of Theorem 1 (Rogers-Ramanujan) using only monodromy analytic continuation, addressing a referee concern about the earlier use of Eisenstein series and the spirit of the problem. The general Theorem 2 (which also covers Theorem 1) already used only monodromy analytic continuation to derive modularity

Abstract

In 1975, G. E. Andrews challenged the mathematics community to address L. Ehrenpreis' problem, which was to directly prove the modularity of the Rogers-Ramanujan $q$-series' summatory forms. This question is important because many different $q$-series appearing in combinatorics, representation theory, and physics often seem to be mysteriously modular, yet there is no general test to confirm this directly from the exotic $q$-series expressions. In this note, we answer the challenge. We use $q$-series algebra, first-order $q$-differential systems, and analytic continuation with monodromy to give a criterion that decides when such series are modular. Specifically, we establish a necessary and sufficient condition for a vector of holomorphic $q$-series on $|q|<1$ to form a vector-valued modular function without modular input, providing a clear path to modularity for strange $q$-series.

BibTeX

Loading...