arXiv++ Combinatorics

The paper is devoted to comparison of two generalizations of the bounding number $\mathfrak{b}$.

We introduce a method that allows to turn topological questions about Hindman spaces into purely combinatorial questions about the Katětov order of ideals on $\mathbb{N}$. We also provide two applications of the method. (1) We characterize $F_σ$ ideals $\mathcal{I}$ for which there is a Hindman space which is not an $\mathcal{I}$-space under the continuum hypothesis. This reduces a topological question of Albin L. Jones about consistency of existence of a Hindman space which is not van der Waerden to the question whether the ideal of all non AP-sets is not below the ideal of all non IP-sets in the Katětov order. (2) Under the continuum hypothesis, we construct a Hindman space which is not an $\mathcal{I}_{1/n}$-space. This answers a question posed by Jana Flašková at the 22nd Summer Conference on Topology and its Applications.

A family I of subsets of a set X is an ideal on X if it is closed under taking subsets and finite unions of its elements. An ideal I on X is below an ideal J on Y in the Katetov order if there is a function $f:Y\to X$ such that $f^{-1}[A]\in J$ for every $A\in I$. We show that the Hindman ideal, the Ramsey ideal and the summable ideal are pairwise incomparable in the Katetov order, where * the Ramsey ideal consists of those sets of pairs of natural numbers which do not contain a set of all pairs of any infinite set (equivalently do not contain, in a sense, any infinite complete subgraph), * the Hindman ideal consists of those sets of natural numbers which do not contain any infinite set together with all finite sums of its members (equivalently do not contain IP-sets that are considered in Ergodic Ramsey theory), * the summable ideal consists of those sets of natural numbers such that the series of the reciprocals of its members is convergent. Moreover, we show that in the Katetov order the above mentioned ideals are not below the van der Waerden ideal that consists of those sets of natural numbers which do not contain arithmetic progressions of arbitrary finite length.

For many years, there have been conducting research (e.g. by Bergelson, Furstenberg, Kojman, Kubiś, Shelah, Szeptycki, Weiss) into sequentially compact spaces that are, in a sense, topological counterparts of some combinatorial theorems, for instance Ramsey's theorem for coloring graphs, Hindman's finite sums theorem and van der Waerden's arithmetical progressions theorem. These spaces are defined with the aid of different kinds of convergences: IP-convergence, R-convergence and ordinary convergence. The first aim of this paper is to present a unified approach to these various types of convergences and spaces. Then, using this unified approach, we prove some general theorems about existence of the considered spaces and show that all results obtained so far in this subject can be derived from our theorems. The second aim of this paper is to obtain new results about the specific types of these spaces. For instance, we construct a Hausdorff Hindman space that is not an $\I_{1/n}$-space and a Hausdorff differentially compact space that is not Hindman. Moreover, we compare Ramsey spaces with other types of spaces. For instance, we construct a Ramsey space that is not Hindman and a Hindman space that is not Ramsey. The last aim of this paper is to provide a characterization that shows when there exists a space of one considered type that is not of the other kind. This characterization is expressed in purely combinatorial manner with the aid of the so-called Katětov order that has been extensively examined for many years so far. This paper may interest the general audience of mathematicians as the results we obtain are on the intersection of topology, combinatorics, set theory and number theory.

The main aim of this paper is to bridge two directions of research generalizing asymptotic density zero sets. This enables to transfer results concerning one direction to the other one. Consider a function $g\colonω\to [0,\infty)$ such that $\lim_{n\to\infty}g(n)=\infty$ and $\frac{n}{g(n)}$ does not converge to $0$. Then the family $\mathcal{Z}_g=\{A\subseteqω:\ \lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{\text{card}(A\cap n)}{g(n)}=0\}$ is an ideal called simple density ideal (or ideal associated to upper density of weight $g$). We compare this class of ideals with Erdős-Ulam ideals. In particular, we show that there are $\sqsubseteq$-antichains of size $\mathfrak{c}$ among Erdős-Ulam ideals which are and are not simple density ideals. We characterize simple density ideals which are Erdős-Ulam as those containing the classical ideal of sets of asymptotic density zero. We also characterize Erdős-Ulam ideals which are simple density ideals. In the latter case we need to introduce two new notions. One of them, called increasing-invariance of an ideal $\mathcal{I}$, asserts that given $B\in\mathcal{I}$ and $C\subseteqω$ with $\text{card}(C\cap n)\leq\text{card}(B\cap n)$ for all $n$, we have $C\in\mathcal{I}$. Finally, we pose some open problems.

In this paper we study a new ideal $\mathcal{WR}$. The main result is the following: an ideal is not weakly Ramsey if and only if it is above $\mathcal{WR}$ in the Katětov order. Weak Ramseyness was introduced by Laflamme in order to characterize winning strategies in a certain game. We apply result of Natkaniec and Szuca to conclude that $\mathcal{WR}$ is critical for ideal convergence of sequences of quasi-continuous functions. We study further combinatorial properties of $\mathcal{WR}$ and weak Ramseyness. Answering a question of Filipów et al. we show that $\mathcal{WR}$ is not $2$-Ramsey, but every ideal on $ω$ isomorphic to $\mathcal{WR}$ is Mon (every sequence of reals contains a monotone subsequence indexed by a $\mathcal{I}$-positive set).