arXiv++ Combinatorics

A functional digraph is a finite digraph in which each vertex has a unique out-neighbor. Considered up to isomorphism and endowed with the directed sum and product, functional digraphs form a semigroup that has recently attracted significant attention, particularly regarding its multiplicative structure. In this context, a functional digraph $X$ divides a functional digraph $A$ if there exists a functional digraph $Y$ such that $XY$ is isomorphic to $A$. The digraph $X$ is said to be prime if it is not the identity for the product, and if, for all functional digraphs $A$ and $B$, the fact that $X$ divides $AB$ implies that $X$ divides $A$ or $B$. In 2020, Antonio E. Porreca asked whether prime functional digraphs exist, and in 2023, his work led him to conjecture that they do not. However, in 2024, Barbora Hudcová discovered that this result had already been proved by Ralph Seifert in 1971, in a somewhat forgotten paper. The terminology in that work differs significantly from that used in recent studies, the framework is more general, and the non-existence of prime functional digraphs appears only as a part of broader results, relying on (overly) technical lemmas developed within this general setting. The aim of this note is to present a much more accessible version of Seifert's proof $-$ that no prime functional digraph exists $-$ by using the current language and simplifying each step as much as possible.

Functional digraphs are unlabelled finite digraphs where each vertex has exactly one out-neighbor. They are isomorphic classes of finite discrete-time dynamical systems. Endowed with the direct sum and product, functional digraphs form a semiring with an interesting multiplicative structure. For instance, we do not know if the following division problem can be solved in polynomial time: given two functional digraphs $A$ and $B$, does $A$ divide $B$? That $A$ divides $B$ means that there exists a functional digraph $X$ such that $AX$ is isomorphic to $B$, and many such $X$ can exist. We can thus ask for the number of solutions $X$. In this paper, we focus on the case where $B$ is a sum of cycles (a disjoint union of cycles, corresponding to the limit behavior of finite discrete-time dynamical systems). There is then a naïve sub-exponential algorithm to compute the non-isomorphic solutions $X$, and our main result is an improvement of this algorithm which has the property to be polynomial when $A$ is fixed. It uses a divide-and-conquer technique that should be useful for further developments on the division problem.

An automata network with $n$ components over a finite alphabet $Q$ of size $q$ is a discrete dynamical system described by the successive iterations of a function $f:Q^n\to Q^n$. In most applications, the main parameter is the interaction graph of $f$: the digraph with vertex set $[n]$ that contains an arc from $j$ to $i$ if $f_i$ depends on input $j$. What can be said on the set $\mathbb{G}(f)$ of the interaction graphs of the automata networks isomorphic to $f$? It seems that this simple question has never been studied. In a previous paper, we prove that the complete digraph $K_n$, with $n^2$ arcs, is universal in that $K_n\in \mathbb{G}(f)$ whenever $f$ is not constant nor the identity (and $n\geq 5$). In this paper, taking the opposite direction, we prove that there exist universal automata networks $f$, in that $\mathbb{G}(f)$ contains all the digraphs on $[n]$, excepted the empty one. Actually, we prove that the presence of only three specific digraphs in $\mathbb{G}(f)$ implies the universality of $f$, and we prove that this forces the alphabet size $q$ to have at least $n$ prime factors (with multiplicity). However, we prove that for any fixed $q\geq 3$, there exists almost universal functions, that is, functions $f:Q^n\to Q^n$ such that the probability that a random digraph belongs to $\mathbb{G}(f)$ tends to $1$ as $n\to\infty$. We do not know if this holds in the binary case $q=2$, providing only partial results.

A Boolean network is a function $f:\{0,1\}^n\to\{0,1\}^n$ from which several dynamics can be derived, depending on the context. The most classical ones are the synchronous and asynchronous dynamics. Both are digraphs on $\{0,1\}^n$, but the synchronous dynamics (which is identified with $f$) has an arc from $x$ to $f(x)$ while the asynchronous dynamics $\mathcal{A}(f)$ has an arc from $x$ to $x+e_i$ whenever $x_i\neq f_i(x)$. Clearly, $f$ and $\mathcal{A}(f)$ share the same information, but what can be said on these objects up to isomorphism? We prove that if $\mathcal{A}(f)$ is only known up to isomorphism then, with high probability, $f$ can be fully reconstructed up to isomorphism. We then show that the converse direction is far from being true. In particular, if $f$ is only known up to isomorphism, very little can be said on the attractors of $\mathcal{A}(f)$. For instance, if $f$ has $p$ fixed points, then $\mathcal{A}(f)$ has at least $\max(1,p)$ attractors, and we prove that this trivial lower bound is tight: there always exists $h\sim f$ such that $\mathcal{A}(h)$ has exactly $\max(1,p)$ attractors. But $\mathcal{A}(f)$ may often have much more attractors since we prove that, with high probability, there exists $h\sim f$ such that $\mathcal{A}(h)$ has $Ω(2^n)$ attractors.

An automata network with $n$ components over a finite alphabet $Q$ of size $q$ is a discrete dynamical system described by the successive iterations of a function $f:Q^n\to Q^n$. In most applications, the main parameter is the interaction graph of $f$: the digraph with vertex set $[n]$ that contains an arc from $j$ to $i$ if $f_i$ depends on input $j$. What can be said on the set $\mathbb{G}(f)$ of the interaction graphs of the automata networks isomorphic to $f$? It seems that this simple question has never been studied. Here, we report some basic facts. First, we prove that if $n\geq 5$ or $q\geq 3$ and $f$ is neither the identity nor constant, then $\mathbb{G}(f)$ always contains the complete digraph $K_n$, with $n^2$ arcs. Then, we prove that $\mathbb{G}(f)$ always contains a digraph whose minimum in-degree is bounded as a function of $q$. Hence, if $n$ is large with respect to $q$, then $\mathbb{G}(f)$ cannot only contain $K_n$. However, we prove that $\mathbb{G}(f)$ can contain only dense digraphs, with at least $\lfloor n^2/4 \rfloor$ arcs.

The structure of the graph defined by the interactions in a Boolean network can determine properties of the asymptotic dynamics. For instance, considering the asynchronous dynamics, the absence of positive cycles guarantees the existence of a unique attractor, and the absence of negative cycles ensures that all attractors are fixed points. In presence of multiple attractors, one might be interested in properties that ensure that attractors are sufficiently "isolated", that is, they can be found in separate subspaces or even trap spaces, subspaces that are closed with respect to the dynamics. Here we introduce notions of separability for attractors and identify corresponding necessary conditions on the interaction graph. In particular, we show that if the interaction graph has at most one positive cycle, or at most one negative cycle, or if no positive cycle intersects a negative cycle, then the attractors can be separated by subspaces. If the interaction graph has no path from a negative to a positive cycle, then the attractors can be separated by trap spaces. Furthermore, we study networks with interaction graphs admitting two vertices that intersect all cycles, and show that if their attractors cannot be separated by subspaces, then their interaction graph must contain a copy of the complete signed digraph on two vertices, deprived of a negative loop. We thus establish a connection between a dynamical property and a complex network motif. The topic is far from exhausted and we conclude by stating some open questions.

The {\em asynchronous automaton} associated with a Boolean network $f:\{0,1\}^n\to\{0,1\}^n$, considered in many applications, is the finite deterministic automaton where the set of states is $\{0,1\}^n$, the alphabet is $[n]$, and the action of letter $i$ on a state $x$ consists in either switching the $i$th component if $f_i(x)\neq x_i$ or doing nothing otherwise. These actions are extended to words in the natural way. A word is then {\em synchronizing} if the result of its action is the same for every state. In this paper, we ask for the existence of synchronizing words, and their minimal length, for a basic class of Boolean networks called and-or-nets: given an arc-signed digraph $G$ on $[n]$, we say that $f$ is an {\em and-or-net} on $G$ if, for every $i\in [n]$, there is $a$ such that, for all state $x$, $f_i(x)=a$ if and only if $x_j=a$ ($x_j\neq a$) for every positive (negative) arc from $j$ to $i$; so if $a=1$ ($a=0$) then $f_i$ is a conjunction (disjunction) of positive or negative literals. Our main result is that if $G$ is strongly connected and has no positive cycles, then either every and-or-net on $G$ has a synchronizing word of length at most $10(\sqrt{5}+1)^n$, much smaller than the bound $(2^n-1)^2$ given by the well known Černý's conjecture, or $G$ is a cycle and no and-or-net on $G$ has a synchronizing word. This contrasts with the following complexity result: it is coNP-hard to decide if every and-or-net on $G$ has a synchronizing word, even if $G$ is strongly connected or has no positive cycles.

A finite dynamical system with $n$ components is a function $f:X\to X$ where $X=X_1\times\dots\times X_n$ is a product of $n$ finite intervals of integers. The structure of such a system $f$ is represented by a signed digraph $G$, called interaction graph: there are $n$ vertices, one per component, and the signed arcs describe the positive and negative influences between them. Finite dynamical systems are usual models for gene networks. In this context, it is often assumed that $f$ is {\em degree-bounded}, that is, the size of each $X_i$ is at most the out-degree of $i$ in $G$ plus one. Assuming that $G$ is connected and that $f$ is degree-bounded, we prove the following: if $G$ is not a cycle, then $f^{n+1}$ may be a constant. In that case, $f$ describes a very simple dynamics: a global convergence toward a unique fixed point in $n+1$ iterations. This shows that, in the degree-bounded case, the fact that $f$ describes a complex dynamics {\em cannot} be deduced from its interaction graph. We then widely generalize the above result, obtaining, as immediate consequences, other limits on what can be deduced from the interaction graph only, as the following weak converses of Thomas' rules: if $G$ is connected and has a positive (negative) cycle, then $f$ may have two (no) fixed points.

We review and discuss some results about the influence of positive and negative feedback cycles in asynchronous Boolean networks. These results merge several ideas of Thomas: positive and negative feedback cycles have been largely emphasized by Thomas, through the so called Thomas' rules, and asynchronous Boolean networks have been introduced by Thomas as a model for the dynamics of gene networks, which is nowadays very popular.

A Boolean network (BN) with $n$ components is a discrete dynamical system described by the successive iterations of a function $f:\{0,1\}^n\to\{0,1\}^n$. In most applications, the main parameter is the interaction graph of $f$: the digraph with vertex set $\{1,\dots,n\}$ that contains an arc from $j$ to $i$ if $f_i$ depends on input $j$. What can be said on the set $\mathcal{G}(f)$ of the interaction graphs of the BNs $h$ isomorphic to $f$, that is, such that $h\circ π=π\circ f$ for some permutation $π$ of $\{0,1\}^n$? It seems that this simple question has never been studied. Here, we report some basic facts. First, if $n\geq 5$ and $f$ is neither the identity or constant, then $\mathcal{G}(f)$ is of size at least two and contains the complete digraph on $n$ vertices, with $n^2$ arcs. Second, for any $n\geq 1$, there are $n$-component BNs $f$ such that every digraph in $\mathcal{G}(f)$ has at least $n^2/9$ arcs.

A Boolean network (BN) with $n$ components is a discrete dynamical system described by the successive iterations of a function $f:\{0,1\}^n \to \{0,1\}^n$. This model finds applications in biology, where fixed points play a central role. For example, in genetic regulations, they correspond to cell phenotypes. In this context, experiments reveal the existence of positive or negative influences among components: component $i$ has a positive (resp. negative) influence on component $j$ meaning that $j$ tends to mimic (resp. negate) $i$. The digraph of influences is called signed interaction digraph (SID), and one SID may correspond to a large number of BNs (which is, in average, doubly exponential according to $n$). The present work opens a new perspective on the well-established study of fixed points in BNs. When biologists discover the SID of a BN they do not know, they may ask: given that SID, can it correspond to a BN having at least/at most $k$ fixed points? Depending on the input, we prove that these problems are in $\textrm{P}$ or complete for $\textrm{NP}$, $\textrm{NP}^{\textrm{NP}}$, $\textrm{NP}^{\textrm{#P}}$ or $\textrm{NEXPTIME}$. In particular, we prove that it is $\textrm{NP}$-complete (resp. $\textrm{NEXPTIME}$-complete) to decide if a given SID can correspond to a BN having at least two fixed points (resp. no fixed point).

The asynchronous dynamics associated with a Boolean network $f : \{0,1\}^n \to \{0,1\}^n$ is a finite deterministic automaton considered in many applications. The set of states is $\{0,1\}^n$, the alphabet is $[n]$, and the action of letter $i$ on a state $x$ consists in either switching the $i$th component if $f_i(x)\neq x_i$ or doing nothing otherwise. This action is extended to words in the natural way. We then say that a word $w$ {\em fixes} $f$ if, for all states $x$, the result of the action of $w$ on $x$ is a fixed point of $f$. A whole family of networks is fixable if its members are all fixed by the same word, and the fixing length of the family is the minimum length of such a word. In this paper, we are interested in families of Boolean networks with relatively small fixing lengths. Firstly, we prove that fixing length of the family of networks with acyclic asynchronous graphs is $Θ(n 2^n)$. Secondly, it is known that the fixing length of the whole family of monotone networks is $O(n^3)$. We then exhibit two families of monotone networks with fixing length $Θ(n)$ and $Θ(n^2)$ respectively, namely monotone networks with tree interaction graphs and conjunctive networks with symmetric interaction graphs.

The asynchronous automaton associated with a Boolean network $f:\{0,1\}^n\to\{0,1\}^n$ is considered in many applications. It is the finite deterministic automaton with set of states $\{0,1\}^n$, alphabet $\{1,\dots,n\}$, where the action of letter $i$ on a state $x$ consists in either switching the $i$th component if $f_i(x)\neq x_i$ or doing nothing otherwise. This action is extended to words in the natural way. We then say that a word $w$ fixes $f$ if, for all states $x$, the result of the action of $w$ on $x$ is a fixed point of $f$. In this paper, we ask for the existence of fixing words, and their minimal length. Firstly, our main results concern the minimal length of words that fix monotone networks. We prove that, for $n$ sufficiently large, there exists a monotone network $f$ with $n$ components such that any word fixing $f$ has length $Ω(n^2)$. For this first result we prove, using Baranyai's theorem, a property about shortest supersequences that could be of independent interest: there exists a set of permutations of $\{1,\dots,n\}$ of size $2^{o(n)}$, such that any sequence containing all these permutations as subsequences is of length $Ω(n^2)$. Conversely, we construct a word of length $O(n^3)$ that fixes all monotone networks with $n$ components. Secondly, we refine and extend our results to different classes of fixable networks, including networks with an acyclic interaction graph, increasing networks, conjunctive networks, monotone networks whose interaction graphs are contained in a given graph, and balanced networks.

We prove that the fully asynchronous dynamics of a Boolean network $f:\{0,1\}^n\to\{0,1\}^n$ without negative loop can be simulated, in a very specific way, by a monotone Boolean network with $2n$ components. We then use this result to prove that, for every even $n$, there exists a monotone Boolean network $f:\{0,1\}^n\to\{0,1\}^n$, an initial configuration $x$ and a fixed point $y$ of $f$ such that: (i) $y$ can be reached from $x$ with a fully asynchronous updating strategy, and (ii) all such strategies contains at least $2^{\frac{n}{2}}$ updates. This contrasts with the following known property: if $f:\{0,1\}^n\to\{0,1\}^n$ is monotone, then, for every initial configuration $x$, there exists a fixed point $y$ such that $y$ can be reached from $x$ with a fully asynchronous strategy that contains at most $n$ updates.

Given a digraph $G$, a lot of attention has been deserved on the maximum number $φ(G)$ of fixed points in a Boolean network $f:\{0,1\}^n\to\{0,1\}^n$ with $G$ as interaction graph. In particular, a central problem in network coding consists in studying the optimality of the classical upper bound $φ(G)\leq 2^τ$, where $τ$ is the minimum size of a feedback vertex set of $G$. In this paper, we study the maximum number $φ_m(G)$ of fixed points in a {\em monotone} Boolean network with interaction graph $G$. We establish new upper and lower bounds on $φ_m(G)$ that depends on the cycle structure of $G$. In addition to $τ$, the involved parameters are the maximum number $ν$ of vertex-disjoint cycles, and the maximum number $ν^{*}$ of vertex-disjoint cycles verifying some additional technical conditions. We improve the classical upper bound $2^τ$ by proving that $φ_m(G)$ is at most the largest sub-lattice of $\{0,1\}^τ$ without chain of size $ν+1$, and without another forbidden-pattern of size $2ν^{*}$. Then, we prove two optimal lower bounds: $φ_m(G)\geq ν+1$ and $φ_m(G)\geq 2^{ν^{*}}$. As a consequence, we get the following characterization: $φ_m(G)=2^τ$ if and only if $ν^{*}=τ$. As another consequence, we get that if $c$ is the maximum length of a chordless cycle of $G$ then $2^{ν/3^c}\leqφ_m(G)\leq 2^{cν}$. Finally, with the technics introduced, we establish an upper bound on the number of fixed points of any Boolean network according to its signed interaction graph.

Given a graph $G$, viewed as a loop-less symmetric digraph, we study the maximum number of fixed points in a conjunctive boolean network with $G$ as interaction graph. We prove that if $G$ has no induced $C_4$, then this quantity equals both the number of maximal independent sets in $G$ and the maximum number of maximal independent sets among all the graphs obtained from $G$ by contracting some edges. We also prove that, in the general case, it is coNP-hard to decide if one of these equalities holds, even if $G$ has a unique induced $C_4$.

Does the interaction graph of a finite dynamical system can force this system to have a "complex" dynamics ? In other words, given a finite interval of integers $A$, which are the signed digraphs $G$ such that every finite dynamical system $f:A^n\to A^n$ with $G$ as interaction graph has a "complex" dynamics ? If $|A|\geq 3$ we prove that no such signed digraph exists. More precisely, we prove that for every signed digraph $G$ there exists a system $f:A^n\to A^n$ with $G$ as interaction graph that converges toward a unique fixed point in at most $\lfloor\log_2 n\rfloor+2$ steps. The boolean case $|A|=2$ is more difficult, and we provide partial answers instead. We exhibit large classes of unsigned digraphs which admit boolean dynamical systems which converge toward a unique fixed point in polynomial, linear or constant time.