arXiv++ Combinatorics

Functional digraphs are unlabelled finite digraphs where each vertex has exactly one out-neighbor. They are isomorphic classes of finite discrete-time dynamical systems. Endowed with the direct sum and product, functional digraphs form a semiring with an interesting multiplicative structure. For instance, we do not know if the following division problem can be solved in polynomial time: given two functional digraphs $A$ and $B$, does $A$ divide $B$? That $A$ divides $B$ means that there exists a functional digraph $X$ such that $AX$ is isomorphic to $B$, and many such $X$ can exist. We can thus ask for the number of solutions $X$. In this paper, we focus on the case where $B$ is a sum of cycles (a disjoint union of cycles, corresponding to the limit behavior of finite discrete-time dynamical systems). There is then a naïve sub-exponential algorithm to compute the non-isomorphic solutions $X$, and our main result is an improvement of this algorithm which has the property to be polynomial when $A$ is fixed. It uses a divide-and-conquer technique that should be useful for further developments on the division problem.

An automata network with $n$ components over a finite alphabet $Q$ of size $q$ is a discrete dynamical system described by the successive iterations of a function $f:Q^n\to Q^n$. In most applications, the main parameter is the interaction graph of $f$: the digraph with vertex set $[n]$ that contains an arc from $j$ to $i$ if $f_i$ depends on input $j$. What can be said on the set $\mathbb{G}(f)$ of the interaction graphs of the automata networks isomorphic to $f$? It seems that this simple question has never been studied. In a previous paper, we prove that the complete digraph $K_n$, with $n^2$ arcs, is universal in that $K_n\in \mathbb{G}(f)$ whenever $f$ is not constant nor the identity (and $n\geq 5$). In this paper, taking the opposite direction, we prove that there exist universal automata networks $f$, in that $\mathbb{G}(f)$ contains all the digraphs on $[n]$, excepted the empty one. Actually, we prove that the presence of only three specific digraphs in $\mathbb{G}(f)$ implies the universality of $f$, and we prove that this forces the alphabet size $q$ to have at least $n$ prime factors (with multiplicity). However, we prove that for any fixed $q\geq 3$, there exists almost universal functions, that is, functions $f:Q^n\to Q^n$ such that the probability that a random digraph belongs to $\mathbb{G}(f)$ tends to $1$ as $n\to\infty$. We do not know if this holds in the binary case $q=2$, providing only partial results.

A Boolean network is a function $f:\{0,1\}^n\to\{0,1\}^n$ from which several dynamics can be derived, depending on the context. The most classical ones are the synchronous and asynchronous dynamics. Both are digraphs on $\{0,1\}^n$, but the synchronous dynamics (which is identified with $f$) has an arc from $x$ to $f(x)$ while the asynchronous dynamics $\mathcal{A}(f)$ has an arc from $x$ to $x+e_i$ whenever $x_i\neq f_i(x)$. Clearly, $f$ and $\mathcal{A}(f)$ share the same information, but what can be said on these objects up to isomorphism? We prove that if $\mathcal{A}(f)$ is only known up to isomorphism then, with high probability, $f$ can be fully reconstructed up to isomorphism. We then show that the converse direction is far from being true. In particular, if $f$ is only known up to isomorphism, very little can be said on the attractors of $\mathcal{A}(f)$. For instance, if $f$ has $p$ fixed points, then $\mathcal{A}(f)$ has at least $\max(1,p)$ attractors, and we prove that this trivial lower bound is tight: there always exists $h\sim f$ such that $\mathcal{A}(h)$ has exactly $\max(1,p)$ attractors. But $\mathcal{A}(f)$ may often have much more attractors since we prove that, with high probability, there exists $h\sim f$ such that $\mathcal{A}(h)$ has $Ω(2^n)$ attractors.

An automata network with $n$ components over a finite alphabet $Q$ of size $q$ is a discrete dynamical system described by the successive iterations of a function $f:Q^n\to Q^n$. In most applications, the main parameter is the interaction graph of $f$: the digraph with vertex set $[n]$ that contains an arc from $j$ to $i$ if $f_i$ depends on input $j$. What can be said on the set $\mathbb{G}(f)$ of the interaction graphs of the automata networks isomorphic to $f$? It seems that this simple question has never been studied. Here, we report some basic facts. First, we prove that if $n\geq 5$ or $q\geq 3$ and $f$ is neither the identity nor constant, then $\mathbb{G}(f)$ always contains the complete digraph $K_n$, with $n^2$ arcs. Then, we prove that $\mathbb{G}(f)$ always contains a digraph whose minimum in-degree is bounded as a function of $q$. Hence, if $n$ is large with respect to $q$, then $\mathbb{G}(f)$ cannot only contain $K_n$. However, we prove that $\mathbb{G}(f)$ can contain only dense digraphs, with at least $\lfloor n^2/4 \rfloor$ arcs.

A Boolean network (BN) with $n$ components is a discrete dynamical system described by the successive iterations of a function $f:\{0,1\}^n \to \{0,1\}^n$. This model finds applications in biology, where fixed points play a central role. For example, in genetic regulations, they correspond to cell phenotypes. In this context, experiments reveal the existence of positive or negative influences among components: component $i$ has a positive (resp. negative) influence on component $j$ meaning that $j$ tends to mimic (resp. negate) $i$. The digraph of influences is called signed interaction digraph (SID), and one SID may correspond to a large number of BNs (which is, in average, doubly exponential according to $n$). The present work opens a new perspective on the well-established study of fixed points in BNs. When biologists discover the SID of a BN they do not know, they may ask: given that SID, can it correspond to a BN having at least/at most $k$ fixed points? Depending on the input, we prove that these problems are in $\textrm{P}$ or complete for $\textrm{NP}$, $\textrm{NP}^{\textrm{NP}}$, $\textrm{NP}^{\textrm{#P}}$ or $\textrm{NEXPTIME}$. In particular, we prove that it is $\textrm{NP}$-complete (resp. $\textrm{NEXPTIME}$-complete) to decide if a given SID can correspond to a BN having at least two fixed points (resp. no fixed point).

An Automata Network is a map ${f:Q^n\rightarrow Q^n}$ where $Q$ is a finite alphabet. It can be viewed as a network of $n$ entities, each holding a state from $Q$, and evolving according to a deterministic synchronous update rule in such a way that each entity only depends on its neighbors in the network's graph, called interaction graph. A major trend in automata network theory is to understand how the interaction graph affects dynamical properties of $f$. In this work we introduce the following property called expansivity: the observation of the sequence of states at any given node is sufficient to determine the initial configuration of the whole network. Our main result is a characterization of interaction graphs that allow expansivity. Moreover, we show that this property is generic among linear automata networks over such graphs with large enough alphabet. We show however that the situation is more complex when the alphabet is fixed independently of the size of the interaction graph: no alphabet is sufficient to obtain expansivity on all admissible graphs, and only non-linear solutions exist in some cases. Finally, among other results, we consider a stronger version of expansivity where we ask to determine the initial configuration from any large enough observation of the system. We show that it can be achieved for any number of nodes and naturally gives rise to maximum distance separable codes.