arXiv++ Combinatorics

Persistent homology summarizes the birth and death of topological features, but it does not by itself specify where a feature is located in the underlying complex. Harmonic persistent homology addresses this by assigning canonical harmonic cycle representatives to bars. In earlier work, Basu and Cox showed that harmonic representatives of simple bars maximize the total relative weight placed on essential simplices, the simplices that are forced to appear in representatives of the corresponding class. In this paper we prove that, for generic one-dimensional bars, this preference is stronger than an aggregate maximization statement. Every essential edge has strictly larger coefficient, in absolute value, than every non-essential edge in the harmonic representative, and the absolute values of the coefficients of all essential edges are equal. The key argument is a finite-dimensional variational characterization of the harmonic representative as a minimum-norm chain with prescribed boundary, combined with an elementary graph-theoretic cut argument. We then prove that the result is special to dimension one. In higher dimensions, the analogous coefficient-wise dominance statement fails. We give examples to show that harmonic representatives can place larger coefficients on non-essential higher-dimensional simplices than on essential ones. These results clarify both the power and the limitations of using harmonic representatives to assign geometric significance to simplices in persistent homology.

If a finite poset $Q$ satisfies the Gold Partition Conjecture, and $P$ is a finite poset, then for any $i$ in $P$ the lexicographic sum of $P$ with $Q$ on the point $i$, satisfies the Gold Partition Conjecture.

Graph-based signal processing techniques have become essential for handling data in non-Euclidean spaces. However, there is a growing awareness that these graph models might need to be expanded into `higher-order' domains to effectively represent the complex relations found in high-dimensional data. Such higher-order domains are typically modeled either as hypergraphs, or as simplicial, cubical or other cell complexes. In this context, cell complexes are often seen as a subclass of hypergraphs with additional algebraic structure that can be exploited, e.g., to develop a spectral theory. In this article, we promote an alternative perspective. We argue that hypergraphs and cell complexes emphasize \emph{different} types of relations, which may have different utility depending on the application context. Whereas hypergraphs are effective in modeling set-type, multi-body relations between entities, cell complexes provide an effective means to model hierarchical, interior-to-boundary type relations. We discuss the relative advantages of these two choices and elaborate on the previously introduced concept of a combinatorial complex that enables co-existing set-type and hierarchical relations. Finally, we provide a brief numerical experiment to demonstrate that this modelling flexibility can be advantageous in learning tasks.