arXiv++ Combinatorics

Maker-Breaker subgraph games are among the most famous combinatorial games. For $n,q\in\mathbb{N}$ and a fixed subgraph $C$ of the complete graph $K_n$, the two players, called Maker and Breaker, alternately claim edges of $K_n$. Maker claims one unclaimed edge per round and Breaker may claim up to $q$ edges per round. If Maker is able to claim all edges of a copy of $C$, he wins the game. Otherwise Breaker wins. Bednarska and Łuczak (2000) determined in a landmark work the asymptotics of the treshold bias as $Θ(n^{1/m(C)})$ where $m(C)$ is the 2-density of $C$, analysing random strategies. Since then it has been a major open problem to determine the treshhold bias, if it exists, with corresponding strategies, leading to sharp constants in the $Θ$-notion. A famous case is the triangle game ($C=C_3$), studied by Chvatal and Erd"os (1978), who showed Maker wins if $q\le \sqrt{2n}$ and Breaker wins if $q\ge2\sqrt{n}$. Glazik and Srivastav (2022) improved this via a potential method, showing Breaker wins already for $q\ge\sqrt{8/3}\sqrt{n}$. Spencer (2019) conjectured generalizability to arbitrary subgraphs $C$. We confirm this conjecture, presenting a general winning strategy for Breaker if the potential function fullfils conditions depending on $C$. With this result we give the first constructive (polynomial-time) strategies for Breaker in the $k$-cycle Maker-Breaker game for arbitrary, but fixed $k \geq 4$: Breaker wins if $q>\sqrt[k-1]{(k-1)\big(\frac{2(k-1)}{k}\big)^{k-2}n^{k-2}}$. By Bednarska and Łuczak (2000) our bound is asymptotically optimal. However, our constants are better than those arising from their random strategies. More recently, Sowa and Srivastav (2025) gave the first constructive Maker strategy for $C_4$. Our work may motivate study of Maker strategies for $C_k, k \ge 5$, narrowing the gap towards the Breaker bounds presented.

An extension of the Erdős-Renyi random graph model $G_{n,p}$ is the model of perturbed graphs introduced by Bohman, Frieze and Martin (Bohman, Frieze, Martin 2003). This is a special case of the model of randomly augmented graphs studied in this paper. An augmented graph denoted by $pert_{H,p}$ is the union of a deterministic host graph and a random graph $G_{n,p}$. Among the first problems in perturbed graphs has been the question how many random edges are needed to ensure Hamiltonicity of the graph. This question was answered in the paper by Bohman, Frieze and Martin. The host graph is often chosen to be a dense graph. In recent years several papers on combinatorial problems in perturbed graphs were published, e.g. on the emergence of powers of Hamiltonian cycles (Dudek, Reiher, Ruciński, Schacht 2020), some positional games played on perturbed graphs (Clemens, Hamann, Mogge, Parczyk, 2020) and the behavior of multiple invariants e.g. fixed clique size (Bohman, Frieze, Krivelevich, Martin, 2004). In this paper we study the chromatic number of randomly augmented graphs. We concentrate on a host graph $H$ with chromatic number $o(n)$, augmented by a $G_{n,p}$ with $n^{-\frac{1}{3} + δ}\leq p(n) \leq 1-δ$ for some $δ\in (0,1)$. Our main result is an upper bound for the chromatic number: we show that asymptotically almost surely $χ(pert_{H,p}) \leq (1+o(1)) \cdot \frac{n \log(b)}{2 (\log(n) - \log(χ(H))}$ where $b = (1-p)^{-1}$. This result collapses to the famous theorem of Bollobás (1988), when $H$ is the empty host graph, thus our result can be regarded as a generalization of the latter. Our proof is not constructive. Further, we give a constructive coloring algorithm, when the chromatic number of the host graph is at most $\frac{n}{\log(n)^α},$ $α>\frac{1}{2}.$

We study the $(a:b)$ Maker-Breaker subgraph game played on the edges of the complete graph $K_n$ on $n$ vertices, $n,a,b \in \mathbb{N}$ where the goal of Maker is to build a copy of a specific fixed subgraph $H$. In our work this is a spanning graph with minimum degree $k=k(n)$, a connected spanning subgraph or a Hamiltonian subgraph. In the $(a:b)$ game in each round Maker chooses $a$ unclaimed edges of $K_n$ and Breaker chooses $b$ unclaimed edges. Maker wins, if he succeeds to build a copy of the subgraph under consideration, otherwise Breaker wins. For the $k$-minimum-degree, we present a winning strategy for Maker leading to a bound that generalizes a bound of Gebauer and Szab{ó} for the $(1:b)$ case. Moreover, we give an explicit strategy for Breaker for $b >(1+o(1)) \frac{an}{a+\ln(n)}$ in case of $a=o\left(\sqrt{\frac{n}{\ln(n)}}\right)$ and $k=o(\ln(n))$. Note that this bound is the same as the Maker bound presented by Hefetz et al. (2012) for the $(a:b)$ connectivity game, which implies that the asymptotic optimal bias for this game is $\frac{an}{a+\ln(n)}$. This resolves the open problem stated by these authors. We also study the $(a:b)$ Hamiltonicity game in which Maker's goal is to create a Hamiltonian subgraph. For the $(1:b)$ variant Krivelevich proved that $\left(1+o(1) \right)\frac{n}{\ln n}$ is the exact threshold bias. Controlling Breaker's vertex degree in the $(a:b)$ Maker-Breaker minimum degree game enables us to the asymptotic optimal generalized threshold bias for the $(a:b)$-game, both for $a=o\left(\sqrt{\frac{n}{\ln n}} \right)$ and $a=Ω\left(\sqrt{\frac{n}{\ln n}} \right)$.

Maker-Breaker subgraph games are among the most famous combinatorial games. For given $n,q \in \mathbb{N}$ and a subgraph $C$ of the complete graph $K_n$, the two players, called Maker and Breaker, alternately claim edges of $K_n$. In each round of the game Maker claims one edge and Breaker is allowed to claim up to $q$ edges. If Maker is able to claim all edges of a copy of $C$, he wins the game. Otherwise Breaker wins. In this work we introduce the first constructive strategy for Maker for the $C_4$-Maker-Breaker game and show that he can win the game if $q < 0.16 n^{2/3}$. According to the theorem of Bednarska and Luczak (2000) $n^{2/3}$ is asymptotically optimal for this game, but the constant given there for a random Maker strategy is magnitudes apart from our constant 0.16.

Let $\mathcal{H}=(V,\mathcal{E})$ be a hypergraph with maximum edge size $\ell$ and maximum degree $Δ$. For given numbers $b_v\in \mathbb{N}_{\geq 2}$, $v\in V$, a set multicover in $\mathcal{H}$ is a set of edges $C \subseteq \mathcal{E}$ such that every vertex $v$ in $V$ belongs to at least $b_v$ edges in $C$. Set multicover is the problem of finding a minimum-cardinality set multicover. Peleg, Schechtman and Wool conjectured that unless $\cal{P} =\cal{NP}$, for any fixed $Δ$ and $b:=\min_{v\in V}b_{v}$, no polynomial-time approximation algorithm for the Set multicover problem has an approximation ratio less than $δ:=Δ-b+1$. Hence, it's a challenge to know whether the problem of set multicover is not approximable within a ratio of $βδ$ with a constant $β<1$. This paper proposes a repeated randomized algorithm for the Set multicover problem combined with an initial deterministic threshold step. Boosting success by repeated trials, our algorithm yields an approximation ratio of $ \max\left\{ \frac{15}{16}δ, \left(1- \frac{(b-1)\exp\left(\frac{ 3δ+1}{8}\right)}{72 \ell} \right)δ\right\}$. The crucial fact is not only that our result improves over the approximation ratio presented by Srivastav et al (Algorithmica 2016) for any $δ\geq 13$, but it's more general since we set no restriction on the parameter $\ell$. Furthermore, we prove that it is NP-hard to approximate the Set multicover problem on $Δ$-regular hypergraphs within a factor of $(δ-1-ε)$. Moreover we show that the integrality gap for the Set multicover problem is at least $\frac{\ln_{2}(n+1)}{2b}$, which for constant $b$ is $Ω(\ln n )$.

Let $\mathcal{H}=(V,\mathcal{E})$ be a hypergraph with maximum edge size $\ell$ and maximum degree $Δ$. For given numbers $b_v\in \mathbb{N}_{\geq 2}$, $v\in V$, a set multicover in $\mathcal{H}$ is a set of edges $C \subseteq \mathcal{E}$ such that every vertex $v$ in $V$ belongs to at least $b_v$ edges in $C$. Set Multicover is the problem of finding a minimum-cardinality set multicover. Peleg, Schechtman and Wool conjectured that for any fixed $Δ$ and $b:=\min_{v\in V}b_{v}$, the problem of \sbmultcov is not approximable within a ratio less than $δ:=Δ-b+1$, unless $\mathcal{P} =\mathcal{NP}$. Hence it's a challenge to explore for which classes of hypergraph the conjecture doesn't hold. We present a polynomial time algorithm for the Set Multicover problem which combines a deterministic threshold algorithm with conditioned randomized rounding steps. Our algorithm yields an approximation ratio of $ \max\left\{ \frac{148}{149}δ, \left(1- \frac{ (b-1)e^{\fracδ{4}}}{94\ell} \right)δ\right\}$. Our result not only improves over the approximation ratio presented by Srivastav et al (Algorithmica 2016) but it's more general since we set no restriction on the parameter $\ell$. Moreover we present a further polynomial time algorithm with an approximation ratio of $\frac{5}{6}δ$ for hypergraphs with $\ell\leq (1+ε)\bar{\ell}$ for any fixed $ε\in [0,\frac{1}{2}]$, where $\bar{\ell}$ is the average edge size. The analysis of this algorithm relies on matching/covering duality due to Ray-Chaudhuri (1960), which we convert into an approximative form. The second performance disprove the conjecture of peleg et al for a large subclass of hypergraphs.

The triangle game introduced by Chvátal and Erdős (1978) is one of the most famous combinatorial games. For $n,q\in\mathbb{N}$, the $(n,q)$-triangle game is played by two players, called Maker and Breaker, on the complete graph $K_n$. Alternately Maker claims one edge and thereafter Breaker claims $q$ edges of the graph. Maker wins the game if he can claim all three edges of a triangle, otherwise Breaker wins. Chvátal and Erdős (1978) proved that for $q<\sqrt{2n+2}-5/2\approx 1.414\sqrt{n}$ Maker has a winning strategy, and for $q\geq 2\sqrt{n}$ Breaker has a winning strategy. Since then, the problem of finding the exact leading constant for the threshold bias of the triangle game has been one of the famous open problems in combinatorial game theory. In fact, the constant is not known for any graph with a cycle and we do not even know if such a constant exists. Balogh and Samotij (2011) slightly improved the Chvátal-Erdős constant for Breaker's winning strategy from $2$ to $1.935$ with a randomized approach. Since then no progress was made. In this work, we present a new deterministic strategy for Breaker's win whenever $n$ is sufficiently large and $q\geq\sqrt{(8/3+o(1))n}\approx 1.633\sqrt{n}$, significantly reducing the gap towards the lower bound. In previous strategies Breaker chooses his edges such that one node is part of the last edge chosen by Maker, whereas the remaining node is chosen more or less arbitrarily. In contrast, we introduce a suitable potential function on the set of nodes. This allows Breaker to pick edges that connect the most `dangerous' nodes. The total potential of the game may still increase, even for several turns, but finally Breaker's strategy prevents the total potential of the game from exceeding a critical level and leads to Breaker's win.