arXiv++ Combinatorics

How can a stack of identical blocks be arranged to extend beyond the edge of a table as far as possible? We consider a generalization of this classic puzzle to blocks that differ in width and mass. Despite the seemingly simple premise, we demonstrate that it is unlikely that one can efficiently determine a stack configuration of maximum overhang. Formally, we prove that the Block-Stacking Problem is NP-hard, partially answering an open question from the literature. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the restriction to stacks without counterweights has a surprising connection to the Airplane Refueling Problem, another famous puzzle, and to Robust Appointment Scheduling, a problem of practical relevance. In addition to revealing a remarkable relation to the real-world challenge of devising schedules under uncertainty, their equivalence unveils a polynomial-time approximation scheme, that is, a $(1+ε)$-approximation algorithm, for Block Stacking without counterbalancing and a $(2+ε)$-approximation algorithm for the general case.

We prove that a maintenance problem on frequency-constrained maintenance jobs with a hierarchical structure is integer-factorization hard. This result holds even on simple systems with just two components to maintain. As a corollary, we provide a first hardness result for Levi et al.'s modular maintenance scheduling problem (Naval Research Logistics 61, 472-488, 2014).

We advance the theoretical study of $\{0, 1/2\}$-cuts for integer programming problems $\max\{c^T x \colon A x \leq b, x \text{ integer}\}$. Such cuts are Gomory-Chvátal cuts that only need multipliers of value $0$ or $1/2$ in their derivation. The intersection of all $\{0, 1/2\}$-cuts derived from $Ax \le b$ is denoted by $P_{1/2}$ and called the $\{0,1/2\}$-closure of $P = \{x : Ax \le b\}$. The primal separation problem for $\{0, 1/2\}$-cuts is: Given a vertex $\hat x$ of the integer hull of $P$ and some fractional point $x^* \in P$, does there exist a $\{0,1/2\}$-cut that is tight at $\hat x$ and violated by $x^*$? Primal separation is the key ingredient of primal cutting-plane approaches to integer programming. In general, primal separation for $\{0,1/2\}$-cuts is NP-hard. We present two cases for which primal separation is solvable in polynomial time. As an interesting side product, we obtain a(nother) simple proof that matching can be solved in polynomial time. Furthermore, since optimization over the Gomory-Chvátal closure is also NP-hard, there has been recent research on solving the optimization problem over the Gomory-Chvátal closure approximately. In a similar spirit, we show that the optimization problem over the $\{0,1/2\}$-closure can be solved in polynomial time up to a factor $(1 + \varepsilon)$, for any fixed $\varepsilon > 0$.

The $\{0,\frac{1}{2}\}$-closure of a rational polyhedron $\{ x \colon Ax \le b \}$ is obtained by adding all Gomory-Chvátal cuts that can be derived from the linear system $Ax \le b$ using multipliers in $\{0,\frac{1}{2}\}$. We show that deciding whether the $\{0,\frac{1}{2}\}$-closure coincides with the integer hull is strongly NP-hard. A direct consequence of our proof is that, testing whether the linear description of the $\{0,\frac{1}{2}\}$-closure derived from $Ax \le b$ is totally dual integral, is strongly NP-hard.