arXiv++ Combinatorics

The chromatic polynomial of a graph $G$, denoted $P(G,m)$, is equal to the number of proper $m$-colorings of $G$ for each $m \in \mathbb{N}$. In 1990, Kostochka and Sidorenko introduced the list color function of graph $G$, denoted $P_{\ell}(G,m)$, which is a list analogue of the chromatic polynomial. The list color function threshold of $G$, denoted $τ(G)$, is the smallest $k \geq χ(G)$ such that $P_{\ell}(G,m) = P(G,m)$ whenever $m \geq k$. It is known that for every graph $G$, $τ(G)$ is finite, and in fact, $τ(G) \leq (|E(G)|-1)/\ln(1+ \sqrt{2}) + 1$. It is also known that when $G$ is a cycle or chordal graph, $G$ is enumeratively chromatic-choosable which means $τ(G) = χ(G)$. A recent paper of Kaul et al. suggests that understanding the list color function threshold of complete bipartite graphs is essential to the study of the extremal behavior of $τ$. In this paper we show that for any $n \geq 2$, $τ(K_{2,n}) \leq \lceil (n+2.05)/1.24 \rceil$ which gives an improvement on the general upper bound for $τ(G)$ when $G = K_{2,n}$. We also develop additional tools that allow us to show that $τ(K_{2,3}) = χ(K_{2,3})$ and $τ(K_{2,4}) = τ(K_{2,5}) = 3$.

DP-coloring (also called correspondence coloring) is a generalization of list coloring that has been widely studied in recent years after its introduction by Dvořák and Postle in 2015. As the analogue of the chromatic polynomial $P(G,m)$, the DP color function of a graph $G$, denoted $P_{DP}(G,m)$, counts the minimum number of DP-colorings over all possible $m$-fold covers. It is known that, unlike the list color function $P_{\ell}(G,m)$, for any $g \geq 3$ there exists a graph $G$ with girth $g$ such that $P_{DP}(G,m) < P(G,m)$ when $m$ is sufficiently large. Thus, two fundamental open questions regarding the DP color function are: (i) for which $G$ does there exist an $N \in \mathbb{N}$ such that $P_{DP}(G,m) = P(G,m)$ whenever $m \geq N$, (ii) Given a graph $G$ does there always exist an $N \in \mathbb{N}$ and a polynomial $p(m)$ such that $P_{DP}(G,m) = p(m)$ whenever $m \geq N$? In this paper we give exact formulas for the DP color function of a Theta graph based on the parity of its path lengths. This gives an explicit answer, including the formulas for the polynomials that are not the chromatic polynomial, to both the questions above for Theta graphs. We extend this result to Generalized Theta graphs by characterizing the exact parity condition that ensures the DP color function eventually equals the chromatic polynomial. To answer the second question for Generalized Theta graphs, we confirm it for the larger class of graphs with a feedback vertex set of size one.

For many networks, it is useful to think of their nodes as being embedded in a latent space, and such embeddings can affect the probabilities for nodes to be adjacent to each other. In this paper, we extend existing models of synthetic networks to spatial network models by first embedding nodes in Euclidean space and then modifying the models so that progressively longer edges occur with progressively smaller probabilities. We start by extending a geographical fitness model by employing Gaussian-distributed fitnesses, and we then develop spatial versions of preferential attachment and configuration models. We define a notion of "spatial strength centrality" to help characterize how strongly a spatial embedding affects network structure, and we examine spatial strength centrality on a variety of real and synthetic networks.

We consider $n$-sided dice whose face values lie between $1$ and $n$ and whose faces sum to $n(n+1)/2$. For two dice $A$ and $B$, define $A \succ B$ if it is more likely for $A$ to show a higher face than $B$. Suppose $k$ such dice $A_1,\dots,A_k$ are randomly selected. We conjecture that the probability of ties goes to 0 as $n$ grows. We conjecture and provide some supporting evidence that---contrary to intuition---each of the $2^{k \choose 2}$ assignments of $\succ$ or $\prec$ to each pair is equally likely asymptotically. For a specific example, suppose we randomly select $k$ dice $A_1,\dots,A_k$ and observe that $A_1 \succ A_2 \succ \ldots \succ A_k$. Then our conjecture asserts that the outcomes $A_k \succ A_1$ and $A_1 \prec A_k$ both have probability approaching $1/2$ as $n \rightarrow \infty$.