arXiv++ Combinatorics

DP-coloring (or correspondence coloring) is a generalization of list coloring that has been widely studied since its introduction by Dvořák and Postle in 2015. As the analogue of $P(G,q)$, the chromatic polynomial of a graph $G$, the DP color function of $G$, denoted by $P_{DP}(G,q)$, counts the minimum number of DP-colorings over all $q$-fold covers of $G$. It follows that $P_{DP}(G,q) \leq P(G,q)$. It is known that there are graphs for which $P_{DP}(G,q) < P(G,q)$ for all sufficiently large $q$; in fact, all bipartite graphs containing a cycle have this property. A fundamental open question about DP color functions asks whether, for every graph $G$, there exist $N \in \mathbb{N}$ and a polynomial $p$ such that $P_{DP}(G,q) = p(q)$ whenever $q \geq N$. In this paper we answer this question affirmatively for all bipartite graphs. Specifically, if $G$ is an $n$-vertex bipartite graph with $c$ components, then $P_{DP}(G,q) = (-1)^{n-c}q^c \;T_G(1-q,1)$ for all sufficiently large $q$, where $T_G(x,y)$ is the Tutte polynomial of $G$. The ideas we develop also yield an asymptotic formula for $P(G,q)-P_{DP}(G,q)$ whenever the girth of $G$ is even.

Given a graph $G$, its chromatic polynomial $P (G, k)$ counts proper $k$-colorings, while the corresponding list color function $P_{\ell} (G, k)$ counts the minimum number of proper colorings across all assignments of $k$ colors to each vertex. While it is clear that $P_{\ell} (G, k) \leq P (G, k)$, Donner showed in 1992 that $P_{\ell} (G, k) = P (G, k)$ whenever $k$ is sufficiently large. In 1985, Hanlon defined and studied the chromatic polynomial for an unlabeled graph. A list version of Hanlon's notion was introduced in 2024 by Kaul and Mudrock, who further raised the question of whether the analog of Donner's result holds in the unlabeled case. While they proved this for all connected point-determining graphs, even the case of the edgeless graph on $n$ vertices remained open and was posed as a conjecture. We prove this conjecture and show that it implies that, more generally, a disconnected graph satisfies the unlabeled analog of Donner's result if all of its connected components do.

Chromatic choosability is a notion of fundamental importance in list coloring. A graph $G$ is chromatic-choosable when its chromatic number, $χ(G)$, is equal to its list chromatic number $χ_{\ell}(G)$. In 1990, Kostochka and Sidorenko introduced the list color function of a graph $G$, denoted $P_{\ell}(G,m)$, which is the list analogue of the chromatic polynomial of $G$, $P(G,m)$. A graph $G$ is said to be enumeratively chromatic-choosable when $P_{\ell}(G,m)=P(G,m)$ for every $m \in \mathbb{N}$. Theta graphs and their generalizations have played an important role in graph coloring problems over the years; for example, they appear in the characterization of chromatic-choosable graphs with chromatic number 2. In this paper we characterize the enumeratively chromatic-choosable theta graphs. Our proof utilizes ideas from DP-coloring (a.k.a. correspondence coloring), providing yet another example of how the more general setting of DP-coloring can be leveraged to attack a problem in list coloring.

DP-coloring (also called correspondence coloring) is a generalization of list coloring introduced by Dvořák and Postle in 2015. The DP-chromatic number of a graph $G$, $χ_{_{DP}}(G)$, is the analogue of the chromatic number of $G$ in the DP context and is bounded above by the degeneracy of $G$ plus one. Over the last two years a plethora of authors have introduced variations on the notion of degeneracy and used these new ideas to give improved bounds on the DP-chromatic number of certain families of graphs. Fractional DP-coloring is a generalization of fractional list coloring introduced by Bernshteyn, Kostochka, and Zhu in 2019. In this paper we introduce two analogues of the degeneracy of a graph to the fractional context, each of which bound its fractional DP-chromatic number from above. We use these analogues to bound the fractional DP-chromatic number of a variety of graphs including unicyclic graphs, some complete bipartite graphs, and sparse graphs.

Chromatic-choosablility is a notion of fundamental importance in list coloring. A graph $G$ is chromatic-choosable when its chromatic number, $χ(G)$, is equal to its list chromatic number $χ_{\ell}(G)$. Flexible list coloring was introduced by Dvořák, Norin, and Postle in 2019 in order to address a situation in list coloring where we still seek a proper list coloring, but each vertex may have a preferred color assigned to it, and for those vertices we wish to color as many of them with their preferred colors as possible. In flexible list coloring, the list flexibility number of $G$, denoted $χ_{\ell flex}(G)$, serves as the natural analogue of $χ_{\ell}(G)$. In 2002, Ohba famously showed that for any graph $G$, there exists an $N \in \mathbb{N}$ such that $χ(K_p \vee G) = χ_{\ell}(K_p \vee G)$ whenever $p \geq N$. Since $χ(G) \leq χ_{\ell}(G) \leq χ_{\ell flex}(G)$, it is natural to ask whether this result holds if $χ_{\ell}$ is replaced with $χ_{\ell flex}$. In this paper we not only show that this result doesn't hold in general if $χ_{\ell}$ is replaced with $χ_{\ell flex}$, but we also give a characterization of the graphs for which it does hold.

We study the list chromatic number of the Cartesian product of a complete graph of order $n$ and a complete bipartite graph with partite sets of size $a$ and $b$, denoted $χ_{\ell}(K_n \square K_{a,b})$. At the 2024 Sparse Graphs Coalition's Workshop on algebraic, extremal, and structural methods and problems in graph colouring, Mudrock presented the following question: For each positive integer $a$, does $χ_{\ell}(K_n \square K_{a,b}) = n+a$ if and only if $b \geq (n+a-1)!^a/(a-1)!^a$? In this paper, we show the answer to this question is yes by studying $χ_{\ell}(H \square K_{a,b})$ when $H$ is strongly chromatic-choosable (a special form of vertex criticality) with the help of the list color function and analytic inequalities such as that of Karamata. Our result can be viewed as a generalization of the well-known result that $χ_{\ell}(K_{a,b}) = 1+a$ if and only if $b \geq a^a$.

DP-coloring (also called correspondence coloring) is a well-studied generalization of list coloring introduced by Dvořák and Postle in 2015. The following sharp bound on the DP-chromatic number of the Cartesian product of graphs $G$ and $H$ is known: $χ_{DP}(G \square H) \leq \text{min}\{χ_{DP}(G) + \text{col}(H), χ_{DP}(H) + \text{col}(G) \} - 1$ where $χ_{DP}(G)$ is the DP-chromatic number of $G$ and $\text{col}(H)$ is the coloring number of $H$. We seek to understand when $χ_{DP}(G \square K_{l,t})$ is far from its chromatic number: $χ(G \square K_{l,t}) = \max \{χ(G), 2 \}$ in the case that $G$ is a $k$-critical graph with $χ_{DP}(G)=k$. In particular, we have $χ_{DP}(G \square K_{l,t}) \leq k + l$, and for fixed $l$ we wish to find the smallest $t$ for which this upper bound is achieved. This can be viewed as an extension of the classic result that the list chromatic number of $K_{l,t}$ is $l+1$ if and only if $t \geq l^l$. Our results illustrate that the DP color function of $G$, the DP analogue of the chromatic polynomial, provides a concept and tool that is useful for making progress on this problem.

Chromatic-choosablility is a notion of fundamental importance in list coloring. A graph is chromatic-choosable when its chromatic number is equal to its list chromatic number. In 1990, Kostochka and Sidorenko introduced the list color function of a graph $G$, denoted $P_{\ell}(G,m)$, which is the list analogue of the chromatic polynomial of $G$, $P(G,m)$. It is known that for any graph $G$ there is a positive integer $k$ such that $P_{\ell}(G,m) = P(G,m)$ whenever $m \geq k$. In this paper, we study enumerative chromatic-choosability. A graph $G$ is enumeratively chromatic-choosable when $P_{\ell}(G,m) = P(G,m)$ whenever $m \in \mathbb{N}$. We completely determine the graphs of chromatic number two that are enumeratively chromatic-choosable. We construct examples of graphs that are chromatic-choosable but fail to be enumeratively-chromatic choosable, and finally, we explore a conjecture as to whether for every graph $G$, there is a $p \in \mathbb{N}$ such that the join of $G$ and $K_p$ is enumeratively chromatic-choosable. The techniques we use to prove results are diverse and include probabilistic ideas and ideas from DP (or correspondence)-coloring.

The chromatic polynomial of a graph is an important notion in algebraic combinatorics that was introduced by Birkhoff in 1912; denoted $P(G,k)$, it equals the number of proper $k$-colorings of graph $G$. Enumerative analogues of the chromatic polynomial of a graph have been introduced for two well-studied generalizations of ordinary coloring, namely, list colorings: $P_{\ell}$, the list color function (1990); and DP colorings: $P_{DP}$, the DP color function (2019), and $P^*_{DP}$, the dual DP color function (2021). For any graph $G$ and $k \in \mathbb{N}$, $P_{DP}(G, k) \leq P_\ell(G,k) \leq P(G,k) \leq P_{DP}^*(G,k)$. In 2000, Dong settled a conjecture of Bartels and Welsh from 1995 known as the Shameful Conjecture by proving that for any $n$-vertex graph $G$, $P(G,k+1)/(k+1)^n \geq P(G,k)/k^n$ for all $k \in \mathbb{N}$ satisfying $k \geq n-1$. In contrast, for infinitely many positive integers $n$, Seymour (1997) gave an example of an $n$-vertex graph for which the above inequality does not hold for some $k = Θ(n/ \log n)$. In this paper, we consider analogues of Dong's result for list and DP color functions. Specifically, in contrast to the chromatic polynomial, we prove that for any $n$-vertex graph $G$, $P_{\ell}(G,k+1)/(k+1)^n \geq P_{\ell}(G,k)/k^n$ and $P_{DP}(G,k+1)/(k+1)^n \geq P_{DP}(G,k)/k^n$ for all $k \in \mathbb{N}$. For the dual DP analogue of these inequalities, we show that there is a graph $G$ and $k \in \mathbb{N}$ such that $P_{DP}^*(G,k+1)/(k+1)^n < P_{DP}^*(G,k)/k^n$, and we prove $P_{DP}^*(G,k+1)/(k+1)^n \geq P_{DP}^*(G,k)/k^n$ for all $k \in \mathbb{N}$ satisfying $k \geq n-1$ when $G$ is an $n$-vertex complete bipartite graph.

Suppose $G$ is a graph and $L$ is a list assignment for $G$. A request of $L$ is a function $r$ with nonempty domain $D\subseteq V(G)$ such that $r(v) \in L(v)$ for each $v \in D$. The triple $(G,L,r)$ is $ε$-satisfiable if there exists a proper $L$-coloring $f$ of $G$ such that $f(v) = r(v)$ for at least $ε|D|$ vertices in $D$. We say $G$ is $(k, ε)$-flexible if $(G,L',r')$ is $ε$-satisfiable whenever $L'$ is a $k$-assignment for $G$ and $r'$ is a request of $L'$. It is known that a graph $G$ is not $(k, ε)$-flexible for any $k$ if and only if $ε> 1/ ρ(G)$ where $ρ(G)$ is the Hall ratio of $G$. The list flexibility number of a graph $G$, denoted $χ_{\ell flex}(G)$, is the smallest $k$ such that $G$ is $(k,1/ ρ(G))$-flexible. A fundamental open question on list flexibility numbers asks: Is there a graph with list flexibility number greater than its coloring number? In this paper, we show that the list flexibility number of any complete multipartite graph $G$ is at most the coloring number of $G$. We also initiate the study of list epsilon flexibility functions of complete bipartite graphs which was first suggested by Kaul, Mathew, Mudrock, and Pelsmajer in 2024. Specifically, we completely determine the list epsilon flexibility function of $K_{m,n}$ when $m \in \{1,2\}$ and establish some additional bounds for small $m$. Our proofs reveal a connection to list coloring complete bipartite graphs with asymmetric list sizes which is a topic that was explored by Alon, Cambie, and Kang in 2021.

The classic enumerative functions for counting colorings of a graph $G$, such as the chromatic polynomial $P(G,k)$, do so under the assumption that the given graph is labeled. In 1985, Hanlon defined and studied the chromatic polynomial for an unlabeled graph $\mathcal{G}$, $P(\mathcal{G}, k)$. Determining $P(\mathcal{G}, k)$ amounts to counting colorings under the action of automorphisms of $\mathcal{G}$. In this paper, we consider the problem of counting list colorings of unlabeled graphs. We extend Hanlon's definition to the list context and define the unlabeled list color function, $P_\ell(\mathcal{G}, k)$, of an unlabeled graph $\mathcal{G}$. In this context, we pursue a fundamental question whose analogues have driven much of the research on counting list colorings and its generalizations: For a given unlabeled graph $\mathcal{G}$, does $P_\ell(\mathcal{G}, k) = P(\mathcal{G}, k)$ when $k$ is large enough? We show the answer to this question is yes for a large class of unlabeled graphs that include point-determining graphs (also known as twin-free graphs, irreducible graphs, and mating graphs).

In extremal combinatorics, it is common to focus on structures that are minimal with respect to a certain property. In particular, critical and list-critical graphs occupy a prominent place in graph coloring theory. Stiebitz, Tuza, and Voigt introduced strongly critical graphs, i.e., graphs that are $k$-critical yet $L$-colorable with respect to every non-constant assignment $L$ of lists of size $k-1$. Here we strengthen this notion and extend it to the framework of DP-coloring (or correspondence coloring) by defining robustly $k$-critical graphs as those that are not $(k-1)$-DP-colorable, but only due to the fact that $χ(G) = k$. We then seek general methods for constructing robustly critical graphs. Our main result is that if $G$ is a critical graph (with respect to ordinary coloring), then the join of $G$ with a sufficiently large clique is robustly critical; this is new even for strong criticality.

DP-coloring (also called correspondence coloring) is a generalization of list coloring that was introduced by Dvořák and Postle in 2015. The chromatic polynomial of a graph is an important notion in algebraic combinatorics that was introduced by Birkhoff in 1912; denoted $P(G,m)$, it equals the number of proper $m$-colorings of graph $G$. Counting function analogues of chromatic polynomials have been introduced for list colorings: $P_{\ell}$, list color functions (1990); DP colorings: $P_{DP}$, DP color functions (2019), and $P^*_{DP}$, dual DP color functions (2021). For any graph $G$ and $m \in \mathbb{N}$, $P_{DP}(G, m) \leq P_\ell(G,m) \leq P(G,m) \leq P_{DP}^*(G,m)$. In 2022 (improving on older results) Dong and Zhang showed that for any graph $G$, $P_{\ell}(G,m)=P(G,m)$ whenever $m \geq |E(G)|-1$. Consequently, the list color function of a graph is a polynomial for sufficiently large $m$. One of the most important and longstanding open questions on DP color functions asks: for every graph $G$ is there an $N \in \mathbb{N}$ and a polynomial $p(m)$ such that $P_{DP}(G,m) = p(m)$ whenever $m \geq N$? We show that the answer to the analogue of this question for dual DP color functions is no. Our proof reveals a connection between a dual DP color function and the balanced chromatic polynomial of a signed graph introduced by Zaslavsky in 1982.

We say that a graph $G$ is chromatic-choosable when its list chromatic number $χ_{\ell}(G)$ is equal to its chromatic number $χ(G)$. Chromatic-choosability is a well-studied topic, and in fact, some of the most famous results and conjectures related to list coloring involve chromatic-choosability. In 2002 Ohba showed that for any graph $G$ there is an $N \in \mathbb{N}$ such that the join of $G$ and a complete graph on at least $N$ vertices is chromatic-choosable. The Ohba number of $G$ is the smallest such $N$. In 2014, Noel suggested studying the Ohba number, $τ_{0}(a,b)$, of complete bipartite graphs with partite sets of size $a$ and $b$. In this paper we improve a 2009 result of Allagan by showing that $τ_{0}(2,b) = \lfloor \sqrt{b} \rfloor - 1$ for all $b \geq 2$, and we show that for $a \geq 2$, $τ_{0}(a,b) = Ω( \sqrt{b} )$ as $b \rightarrow \infty$. We also initiate the study of some relaxed versions of the Ohba number of a graph which we call generalized Ohba numbers. We present some upper and lower bounds of generalized Ohba numbers of complete bipartite graphs while also posing some questions.

Given a list assignment for a graph, list packing asks for the existence of multiple pairwise disjoint list colorings of the graph. Several papers have recently appeared that study the existence of such a packing of list colorings. Formally, a proper $L$-packing of size $k$ of a graph $G$ is a set of $k$ pairwise disjoint proper $L$-colorings of $G$ where $L$ is a list assignment of colors to the vertices of $G$. In this note, we initiate the study of counting such packings of list colorings of a graph. We define $P_\ell^\star(G,q,k)$ as the guaranteed number of proper $L$-packings of size $k$ of $G$ over all list assignments $L$ that assign $q$ colors to each vertex of $G$, and we let $P^\star(G,q,k)$ be its classical coloring counterpart. We let $P_\ell^\star(G,q)= P_\ell^\star(G,q,q)$ so that $P_\ell^\star(G,q)$ is the enumerative function for the previously studied list packing number $χ_\ell^\star(G)$. Note that the chromatic polynomial of $G$, $P(G,q)$, is $P^\star(G,q,1)$, and the list color function of $G$, $P_\ell(G,q)$, is $P_\ell^\star(G,q,1)$. Inspired by the well-known behavior of the list color function and the chromatic polynomial, we make progress towards the question of whether $P_{\ell}^\star(G,q,k) = P^\star(G,q,k)$ when $q$ is large enough. Our result generalizes the recent theorem of Dong and Zhang (2023), which improved results going back to Donner (1992), about when the list color function equals the chromatic polynomial. Further, we use a polynomial method to generalize bounds on the list packing number, $χ_\ell^\star(G)$, of sparse graphs to exponential lower bounds (in the number of vertices of $G$) on the corresponding list packing functions, $P_\ell^\star(G,q)$.

The notion of $S$-labeling of graphs, where $S$ is a subset of a symmetric group, was introduced in 2019 by Jin, Wong, and Zhu. This notion provides the framework for a common generalization of various well studied notions of graph coloring, including classical coloring, signed $k$-coloring, signed $\mathbb{Z}_k$-coloring, DP (or correspondence) coloring, group coloring, and coloring of gained graphs. In this paper, we present a unified and simple polynomial method for giving exponential lower bounds on the number of colorings of an $S$-labeled graph for all such $S$. This algebraic technique allows us to prove new lower bounds on the number of colorings of any $S$-labeling of graphs satisfying certain sparsity conditions. We also investigate how the structure of $S$ can be exploited to improve the applicability of these bounds. Our results give new lower bounds on the number of DP-colorings, and consequently the number of all types of colorings listed above. This includes the chromatic polynomial and the number of list colorings of families of planar graphs, and the number of colorings of signed graphs. These enumerative bounds improve previously known results or are the first such known results.

DP-coloring (also called correspondence coloring) of graphs is a generalization of list coloring that has been widely studied since its introduction by Dvořák and Postle in $2015$. Intuitively, DP-coloring generalizes list coloring by allowing the colors that are identified as the same to vary from edge to edge. Formally, DP-coloring of a graph $G$ is equivalent to an independent transversal in an auxiliary structure called a DP-cover of $G$. In this paper, we introduce the notion of random DP-covers and study the behavior of DP-coloring from such random covers. We prove a series of results about the probability that a graph is or is not DP-colorable from a random cover. These results support the following threshold behavior on random $k$-fold DP-covers as $ρ\to\infty$ where $ρ$ is the maximum density of a graph: graphs are non-DP-colorable with high probability when $k$ is sufficiently smaller than $ρ/\lnρ$, and graphs are DP-colorable with high probability when $k$ is sufficiently larger than $ρ/\lnρ$. Our results depend on $ρ$ growing fast enough and imply a sharp threshold for dense enough graphs. For sparser graphs, we analyze DP-colorability in terms of degeneracy. We also prove fractional DP-coloring analogs to these results.

DP-coloring (or correspondence coloring) is a generalization of list coloring that has been widely studied since its introduction by Dvořák and Postle in 2015. As the analogue of the chromatic polynomial of a graph $G$, $P(G,m)$, and the list color function, $P_{\ell}(G,m)$, the DP color function of $G$, denoted by $P_{DP}(G,m)$, counts the minimum number of DP-colorings over all possible $m$-fold covers. It follows that $P_{DP}(G,m) \le P_{\ell}(G,m) \le P(G,m)$. A function $f$ is chromatic-adherent if for every graph $G$, $f(G,a) = P(G,a)$ for some $a \geq χ(G)$ implies that $f(G,m) = P(G,m)$ for all $m \geq a$. It is known that the DP color function is not chromatic-adherent, but there are only two known graphs that demonstrate this. Suppose $G$ is an $n$-vertex graph and $\mathcal{H}$ is a 3-fold cover of $G$, in this paper we associate with $\mathcal{H}$ a polynomial $f_{G, \mathcal{H}} \in \mathbb{F}_3[x_1, \ldots, x_n]$ so that the number of non-zeros of $f_{G, \mathcal{H}}$ equals the number of $\mathcal{H}$-colorings of $G$. We then use a well-known result of Alon and Füredi on the number of non-zeros of a polynomial to establish a non-trivial lower bound on $P_{DP}(G,3)$ when $2n > |E(G)|$. An easy consequence of this is that $P_{DP}(G, 3) \geq 3^{n/6}$ for every $n$-vertex planar graph $G$ of girth at least 5, improving the previously known bounds on both $P_{DP}(G, 3)$ and $P_{\ell}(G, 3)$. Finally, we use this bound to show that there are infinitely many graphs that demonstrate the non-chromatic-adherence of the DP color function.

Flexible list coloring was introduced by Dvořák, Norin, and Postle in 2019. Suppose $0 \leq ε\leq 1$, $G$ is a graph, $L$ is a list assignment for $G$, and $r$ is a function with non-empty domain $D\subseteq V(G)$ such that $r(v) \in L(v)$ for each $v \in D$ ($r$ is called a request of $L$). The triple $(G,L,r)$ is $ε$-satisfiable if there exists a proper $L$-coloring $f$ of $G$ such that $f(v) = r(v)$ for at least $ε|D|$ vertices in $D$. We say $G$ is $(k, ε)$-flexible if $(G,L',r')$ is $ε$-satisfiable whenever $L'$ is a $k$-assignment for $G$ and $r'$ is a request of $L'$. It was shown by Dvořák et al. that if $d+1$ is prime, $G$ is a $d$-degenerate graph, and $r$ is a request for $G$ with domain of size $1$, then $(G,L,r)$ is $1$-satisfiable whenever $L$ is a $(d+1)$-assignment. In this paper, we extend this result to all $d$ for bipartite $d$-degenerate graphs. The literature on flexible list coloring tends to focus on showing that for a fixed graph $G$ and $k \in \mathbb{N}$ there exists an $ε> 0$ such that $G$ is $(k, ε)$-flexible, but it is natural to try to find the largest possible $ε$ for which $G$ is $(k,ε)$-flexible. In this vein, we improve a result of Dvořák et al., by showing $d$-degenerate graphs are $(d+2, 1/2^{d+1})$-flexible. In pursuit of the largest $ε$ for which a graph is $(k,ε)$-flexible, we observe that a graph $G$ is not $(k, ε)$-flexible for any $k$ if and only if $ε> 1/ ρ(G)$, where $ρ(G)$ is the Hall ratio of $G$, and we initiate the study of the list flexibility number of a graph $G$, which is the smallest $k$ such that $G$ is $(k,1/ ρ(G))$-flexible. We study relationships and connections between the list flexibility number, list chromatic number, list packing number, and degeneracy of a graph.

List packing is a notion that was introduced in 2021 (by Cambie et al.). The list packing number of a graph $G$, denoted $χ_{\ell}^*(G)$, is the least $k$ such that for any list assignment $L$ that assigns $k$ colors to each vertex of $G$, there is a set of $k$ proper $L$-colorings of $G$, $\{f_1, \ldots, f_k \}$, with the property $f_i(v) \neq f_j(v)$ whenever $1 \leq i < j \leq k$ and $v \in V(G)$. We present a short proof that for any graph $G$, $χ_{\ell}^*(G) \leq |V(G)|$. Interestingly, our proof makes use of Galvin's celebrated result that the list chromatic number of the line graph of any bipartite multigraph equals its chromatic number.