arXiv++ Combinatorics

The chromatic polynomial of a graph $G$, denoted $P(G,m)$, is equal to the number of proper $m$-colorings of $G$ for each $m \in \mathbb{N}$. In 1990, Kostochka and Sidorenko introduced the list color function of graph $G$, denoted $P_{\ell}(G,m)$, which is a list analogue of the chromatic polynomial. The list color function threshold of $G$, denoted $τ(G)$, is the smallest $k \geq χ(G)$ such that $P_{\ell}(G,m) = P(G,m)$ whenever $m \geq k$. It is known that for every graph $G$, $τ(G)$ is finite, and in fact, $τ(G) \leq (|E(G)|-1)/\ln(1+ \sqrt{2}) + 1$. It is also known that when $G$ is a cycle or chordal graph, $G$ is enumeratively chromatic-choosable which means $τ(G) = χ(G)$. A recent paper of Kaul et al. suggests that understanding the list color function threshold of complete bipartite graphs is essential to the study of the extremal behavior of $τ$. In this paper we show that for any $n \geq 2$, $τ(K_{2,n}) \leq \lceil (n+2.05)/1.24 \rceil$ which gives an improvement on the general upper bound for $τ(G)$ when $G = K_{2,n}$. We also develop additional tools that allow us to show that $τ(K_{2,3}) = χ(K_{2,3})$ and $τ(K_{2,4}) = τ(K_{2,5}) = 3$.

The chromatic polynomial of a graph $G$, denoted $P(G,m)$, is equal to the number of proper $m$-colorings of $G$. The list color function of graph $G$, denoted $P_{\ell}(G,m)$, is a list analogue of the chromatic polynomial that has been studied since the early 1990s, primarily through comparisons with the corresponding chromatic polynomial. It is known that for any graph $G$ there is a $k \in \mathbb{N}$ such that $P_\ell(G,m) = P(G,m)$ whenever $m \geq k$. The list color function threshold of $G$, denoted $τ(G)$, is the smallest $k \geq χ(G)$ such that $P_{\ell}(G,m) = P(G,m)$ whenever $m \geq k$. In 2009, Thomassen asked whether there is a universal constant $α$ such that for any graph $G$, $τ(G) \leq χ_{\ell}(G) + α$, where $χ_{\ell}(G)$ is the list chromatic number of $G$. We show that the answer to this question is no by proving that there exists a constant $C$ such that $τ(K_{2,l}) - χ_{\ell}(K_{2,l}) \ge C\sqrt{l}$ for $l \ge 16$.

DP-coloring (also called correspondence coloring) is a generalization of list coloring that has been widely studied in recent years after its introduction by Dvořák and Postle in 2015. As the analogue of the chromatic polynomial of a graph $G$, $P(G,m)$, the DP color function of $G$, denoted by $P_{DP}(G,m)$, counts the minimum number of DP-colorings over all possible $m$-fold covers. Formulas for chromatic polynomials of clique-gluings of graphs, a fundamental graph operation, are well-known, but the effect of such gluings on the DP color function is not well understood. In this paper we study the DP color function of $K_p$-gluings of graphs. Recently, Becker et. al. asked whether $P_{DP}(G,m) \leq (\prod_{i=1}^n P_{DP}(G_i,m))/\left( \prod_{i=0}^{p-1} (m-i) \right)^{n-1}$ whenever $m \geq p$, where the expression on the right is the DP-coloring analogue of the corresponding chromatic polynomial formula for a $K_p$-gluing, $G$, of $G_1, \ldots, G_n$. Becker et. al. showed this inequality holds when $p=1$. In this paper we show this inequality holds for edge-gluings ($p=2$). On the other hand, we show it does not hold for triangle-gluings ($p=3$), which also answers a question of Dong and Yang (2021). Finally, we show a relaxed version, based on a class of $m$-fold covers that we conjecture would yield the fewest DP-colorings for a given graph, of the inequality holds when $p \geq 3$.

DP-coloring (also called correspondence coloring) is a generalization of list coloring introduced by Dvořák and Postle in 2015. Motivated by results related to list coloring Cartesian products of graphs, we initiate the study of the DP-chromatic number, $χ_{DP}$, of the same. We show that $χ_{DP}(G \square H) \leq \text{min}\{χ_{DP}(G) + \text{col}(H), χ_{DP}(H) + \text{col}(G) \} - 1$ where $\text{col}(H)$ is the coloring number of the graph $H$. We focus on building tools for lower bound arguments for $χ_{DP}(G \square H)$ and use them to show the sharpness of the bound above and its various forms. Our results illustrate that the DP color function of $G$, the DP analogue of the chromatic polynomial, is essential in the study of the DP-chromatic number of the Cartesian product of graphs, including the following question that extends the sharpness problem above and the classical result on gap between list chromatic number and chromatic number: given any graph $G$ and $k \in \mathbb{N}$, what is the smallest $t$ for which $χ_{DP}(G \square K_{k,t})= χ_{DP}(G) + k$?

DP-coloring (also called correspondence coloring) is a generalization of list coloring that has been widely studied in recent years after its introduction by Dvořák and Postle in 2015. The chromatic polynomial of a graph is an extensively studied notion in combinatorics since its introduction by Birkhoff in 1912; denoted $P(G,m)$, it equals the number of proper $m$-colorings of graph $G$. Counting function analogues of the chromatic polynomial have been introduced and studied for list colorings: $P_{\ell}$, the list color function (1990); DP colorings: $P_{DP}$, the DP color function (2019), and $P^*_{DP}$, the dual DP color function (2021). For any graph $G$ and $m \in \mathbb{N}$, $P_{DP}(G, m) \leq P_\ell(G,m) \leq P(G,m) \leq P_{DP}^*(G,m)$. A function $f$ is chromatic-adherent if for every graph $G$, $f(G,a) = P(G,a)$ for some $a \geq χ(G)$ implies that $f(G,m) = P(G,m)$ for all $m \geq a$. It is not known if the list color function and the DP color function are chromatic-adherent. We show that the DP color function is not chromatic-adherent by studying the DP color function of Generalized Theta graphs. The tools we develop along with the Rearrangement Inequality give a new method for determining the DP color function of all Theta graphs and the dual DP color function of all Generalized Theta graphs.

DP-coloring is a generalization of list coloring that was introduced in 2015 by Dvořák and Postle. The chromatic polynomial of a graph $G$, denoted $P(G,m)$, is equal to the number of proper $m$-colorings of $G$. A well-known tool for computing the chromatic polynomial of graph $G$ is the deletion-contraction formula which relates $P(G,m)$ to the chromatic polynomials of two smaller graphs. The DP color function of a graph $G$, denoted $P_{DP}(G,m)$, is a DP-coloring analogue of the chromatic polynomial, and $P_{DP}(G,m)$ is the minimum number of DP-colorings of $G$ over all possible $m$-fold covers. In this paper we present a deletion-contraction relation for the DP color function. To make this possible, we extend the definition of the DP color function to multigraphs. We also introduce the dual DP color function of a graph $G$, denoted $P^*_{DP}(G,m)$, which counts the maximum number of DP-colorings of $G$ over certain $m$-fold covers. We show how the dual DP color function along with our deletion-contraction relation yields a new general lower bound on the DP color function of a graph.

DP-coloring (also called correspondence coloring) is a generalization of list coloring that has been widely studied in recent years after its introduction by Dvořák and Postle in 2015. As the analogue of the chromatic polynomial $P(G,m)$, the DP color function of a graph $G$, denoted $P_{DP}(G,m)$, counts the minimum number of DP-colorings over all possible $m$-fold covers. Chromatic polynomials for joins and vertex-gluings of graphs are well understood, but the effect of these graph operations on the DP color function is not known. In this paper we make progress on understanding the DP color function of the join of a graph with a complete graph and vertex-gluings of certain graphs. We also develop tools to study the DP color function under these graph operations, and we study the threshold (smallest $m$) beyond which the DP color function of a graph constructed with these operations equals its chromatic polynomial.

DP-coloring (also called correspondence coloring) is a generalization of list coloring that has been widely studied in recent years after its introduction by Dvořák and Postle in 2015. As the analogue of the chromatic polynomial $P(G,m)$, the DP color function of a graph $G$, denoted $P_{DP}(G,m)$, counts the minimum number of DP-colorings over all possible $m$-fold covers. It is known that, unlike the list color function $P_{\ell}(G,m)$, for any $g \geq 3$ there exists a graph $G$ with girth $g$ such that $P_{DP}(G,m) < P(G,m)$ when $m$ is sufficiently large. Thus, two fundamental open questions regarding the DP color function are: (i) for which $G$ does there exist an $N \in \mathbb{N}$ such that $P_{DP}(G,m) = P(G,m)$ whenever $m \geq N$, (ii) Given a graph $G$ does there always exist an $N \in \mathbb{N}$ and a polynomial $p(m)$ such that $P_{DP}(G,m) = p(m)$ whenever $m \geq N$? In this paper we give exact formulas for the DP color function of a Theta graph based on the parity of its path lengths. This gives an explicit answer, including the formulas for the polynomials that are not the chromatic polynomial, to both the questions above for Theta graphs. We extend this result to Generalized Theta graphs by characterizing the exact parity condition that ensures the DP color function eventually equals the chromatic polynomial. To answer the second question for Generalized Theta graphs, we confirm it for the larger class of graphs with a feedback vertex set of size one.

DP-coloring is a generalization of list coloring that was introduced in 2015 by Dvořák and Postle. The chromatic polynomial of a graph is a notion that has been extensively studied since the early 20th century. The chromatic polynomial of graph $G$ is denoted $P(G,m)$, and it is equal to the number of proper $m$-colorings of $G$. In 2019, Kaul and Mudrock introduced an analogue of the chromatic polynomial for DP-coloring; specifically, the DP color function of graph $G$ is denoted $P_{DP}(G,m)$. Two fundamental questions posed by Kaul and Mudrock are: (1) For any graph $G$ with $n$ vertices, is it the case that $P(G,m)-P_{DP}(G,m) = O(m^{n-3})$ as $m \rightarrow \infty$? and (2) For every graph $G$, does there exist $p,N \in \mathbb{N}$ such that $P_{DP}(K_p \vee G, m) = P(K_p \vee G, m)$ whenever $m \geq N$? We show that the answer to both these questions is yes. In fact, we show the answer to (2) is yes even if we require $p=1$.

Equitable list arboricity, introduced by Zhang in 2016, generalizes the notion of equitable list coloring by requiring the subgraph induced by each color class to be acyclic (instead of edgeless) in addition to the usual upper bound on the size of each color class. Graph $G$ is equitably $k$-list arborable if an equitable, arborable list coloring of $G$ exists for every list assignment for $G$ that associates with each vertex in $G$ a list of $k$ available colors. Zhang conjectured that any graph $G$ is equitably $k$-list arborable for each $k$ satisfying $k \geq \lceil (1+Δ(G))/2 \rceil$. We verify this conjecture for powers of cycles by applying a new lemma which is a general tool for extending partial equitable, arborable list colorings. We also propose a stronger version of Zhang's Conjecture for certain connected graphs: any connected graph $G$ is equitably $k$-list arborable for each $k$ satisfying $k \geq \lceil Δ(G)/2 \rceil$ provided $G$ is neither a cycle nor a complete graph of odd order. We verify this stronger version of Zhang's Conjecture for powers of paths, 2-degenerate graphs, and certain other graphs. We also show that if $G$ is equitably $k$-list arborable it does not necessarily follow that $G$ is equitably $(k+1)$-list arborable which addresses a question of Drgas-Burchardt, Furmanczyk, and Sidorowicz (2018).

Equitable $k$-choosability is a list analogue of equitable $k$-coloring that was introduced by Kostochka, Pelsmajer, and West in 2003. It is known that if vertex disjoint graphs $G_1$ and $G_2$ are equitably $k$-choosable, the disjoint union of $G_1$ and $G_2$ may not be equitably $k$-choosable. Given any $m \in \mathbb{N}$ the values of $k$ for which $K_{1,m}$ is equitably $k$-choosable are known. Also, a complete characterization of equitably $2$-choosable graphs is not known. With these facts in mind, we study the equitable choosability of $\sum_{i=1}^n K_{1,m_i}$, the disjoint union of $n$ stars. We show that determining whether $\sum_{i=1}^n K_{1,m_i}$ is equitably choosable is NP-complete when the same list of two colors is assigned to every vertex. We completely determine when the disjoint union of two stars (or $n \geq 2$ identical stars) is equitably 2-choosable, and we present results on the equitable $k$-choosability of the disjoint union of two stars for arbitrary $k$.

Proportional choosability is a list analogue of equitable coloring that was introduced in 2019. The smallest $k$ for which a graph $G$ is proportionally $k$-choosable is the proportional choice number of $G$, and it is denoted $χ_{pc}(G)$. In the first ever paper on proportional choosability, it was shown that when $2 \leq n \leq m$, $ \max\{ n + 1, 1 + \lceil m / 2 \rceil\} \leq χ_{pc}(K_{n,m}) \leq n + m - 1$. In this note we improve on this result by showing that $ \max\{ n + 1, \lceil n / 2 \rceil + \lceil m / 2 \rceil\} \leq χ_{pc}(K_{n,m}) \leq n + m -1- \lfloor m/3 \rfloor$. In the process, we prove some new lower bounds on the proportional choice number of complete multipartite graphs. We also present several interesting open questions.

In 1980, Albertson and Berman introduced partial coloring. In 2000, Albertson, Grossman, and Haas introduced partial list coloring. Here, we initiate the study of partial coloring for an insightful generalization of list coloring introduced in 2015 by Dvořák and Postle, DP-coloring (or correspondence coloring). We consider the DP-coloring analogue of the Partial List Coloring Conjecture, which generalizes a natural bound for partial coloring. We show that while this partial DP-coloring conjecture does not hold, several results on partial list coloring can be extended to partial DP-coloring. We also study partial DP-coloring of the join of a graph with a complete graph, and we present several interesting open questions.

We initiate the study of applying the Combinatorial Nullstellensatz to the DP-coloring of graphs even though, as is well-known, the Alon-Tarsi theorem does not apply to DP-coloring. We define the notion of good covers of prime order which allows us to apply the Combinatorial Nullstellensatz to DP-coloring. We apply these tools to DP-coloring of the cones of certain bipartite graphs and uniquely 3-colorable graphs. We also extend a result of Akbari, Mirrokni, and Sadjad (2006) on unique list colorability to the context of DP-coloring. We establish a sufficient algebraic condition for a graph $G$ to satisfy $χ_{DP}(G) \leq 3$, and we completely determine the DP-chromatic number of squares of all cycles.

Proportional choosability is a list coloring analogue of equitable coloring. Specifically, a $k$-assignment $L$ for a graph $G$ specifies a list $L(v)$ of $k$ available colors to each $v \in V(G)$. An $L$-coloring assigns a color to each vertex $v$ from its list $L(v)$. A proportional $L$-coloring of $G$ is a proper $L$-coloring in which each color $c \in \bigcup_{v \in V(G)} L(v)$ is used $\lfloor η(c)/k \rfloor$ or $\lceil η(c)/k \rceil$ times where $η(c)=\left\lvert{\{v \in V(G) : c \in L(v) \}}\right\rvert$. A graph $G$ is proportionally $k$-choosable if a proportional $L$-coloring of $G$ exists whenever $L$ is a $k$-assignment for $G$. Motivated by earlier work, we initiate the study of proportional choosability with a bounded palette by studying proportional 2-choosability with a bounded palette. In particular, when $\ell \geq 2$, a graph $G$ is said to be proportionally $(2, \ell)$-choosable if a proportional $L$-coloring of $G$ exists whenever $L$ is a $2$-assignment for $G$ satisfying $|\bigcup_{v \in V(G)} L(v)| \leq \ell$. We observe that a graph is proportionally $(2,2)$-choosable if and only if it is equitably 2-colorable. As $\ell$ gets larger, the set of proportionally $(2, \ell)$-choosable graphs gets smaller. We show that whenever $\ell \geq 5$ a graph is proportionally $(2, \ell)$-choosable if and only if it is proportionally 2-choosable. We also completely characterize the connected proportionally $(2, \ell)$-choosable graphs when $\ell = 3,4$.

DP-coloring (also called correspondence coloring) is a generalization of list coloring introduced by Dvořák and Postle in 2015. In 2019, Bernshteyn, Kostochka, and Zhu introduced a fractional version of DP-coloring. They showed that unlike the fractional list chromatic number, the fractional DP-chromatic number of a graph $G$, denoted $χ_{_{DP}}^*(G)$, can be arbitrarily larger than $χ^*(G)$, the graph's fractional chromatic number. We generalize a result of Alon, Tuza, and Voigt (1997) on the fractional list chromatic number of odd cycles, and, in the process, show that for each $k \in \mathbb{N}$, $χ_{_{DP}}^*(C_{2k+1}) = χ^*(C_{2k+1})$. We also show that for any $n \geq 2$ and $m \in \mathbb{N}$, if $p^*$ is the solution in $(0,1)$ to $p=(1-p)^n$ then $χ_{_{DP}}^*(K_{n,m})\leq1/p^*$, and we prove a generalization of this result for multipartite graphs. Finally, we determine a lower bound on $χ_{_{DP}}^*(K_{2,m})$ for any $m \geq 3$.

In 2003 Kostochka, Pelsmajer, and West introduced a list analogue of equitable coloring called equitable choosability. A $k$-assignment, $L$, for a graph $G$ assigns a list, $L(v)$, of $k$ available colors to each $v \in V(G)$, and an equitable $L$-coloring of $G$ is a proper coloring, $f$, of $G$ such that $f(v) \in L(v)$ for each $v \in V(G)$ and each color class of $f$ has size at most $\lceil |V(G)|/k \rceil$. In 2018, Kaul, Mudrock, and Pelsmajer subsequently introduced the List Equitable Total Coloring Conjecture which states that if $T$ is a total graph of some simple graph, then $T$ is equitably $k$-choosable for each $k \geq \max \{χ_\ell(T), Δ(T)/2 + 2 \}$ where $Δ(T)$ is the maximum degree of a vertex in $T$ and $χ_\ell(T)$ is the list chromatic number of $T$. In this paper we verify the List Equitable Total Coloring Conjecture for subdivisions of stars and the generalized theta graph.

The chromatic polynomial of a graph $G$, denoted $P(G,m)$, is equal to the number of proper $m$-colorings of $G$. The list color function of graph $G$, denoted $P_{\ell}(G,m)$, is a list analogue of the chromatic polynomial that has been studied since 1992, primarily through comparisons with the corresponding chromatic polynomial. DP-coloring (also called correspondence coloring) is a generalization of list coloring recently introduced by Dvořák and Postle. In this paper, we introduce a DP-coloring analogue of the chromatic polynomial called the DP color function, denoted $P_{DP}(G,m)$, and ask several fundamental open questions about it, making progress on some of them. Motivated by known results related to the list color function, we show that while the DP color function behaves similar to the list color function for some graphs, there are also some surprising differences. For example, Wang, Qian, and Yan recently showed that if $G$ is a connected graph with $l$ edges, then $P_{\ell}(G,m)=P(G,m)$ whenever $m > \frac{l-1}{\ln(1+ \sqrt{2})}$, but we will show that for any $g \geq 3$ there exists a graph, $G$, with girth $g$ such that $P_{DP}(G,m) < P(G,m)$ when $m$ is sufficiently large. We also study the asymptotics of $P(G,m) - P_{DP}(G,m)$ for a fixed graph $G$. We develop techniques to compute $P_{DP}(G,m)$ exactly and apply them to certain classes of graphs such as chordal graphs, unicyclic graphs, and cycles with a chord. Finally, we make progress towards showing that for any graph $G$, there is a $p$ such that $P_{DP}(G \vee K_p, m) = P(G \vee K_p , m)$ for large enough $m$.

We study the list chromatic number of the Cartesian product of any graph $G$ and a complete bipartite graph with partite sets of size $a$ and $b$, denoted $χ_\ell(G \square K_{a,b})$. We have two motivations. A classic result on the gap between list chromatic number and the chromatic number tells us $χ_\ell(K_{a,b}) = 1 + a$ if and only if $b \geq a^a$. Since $χ_\ell(K_{a,b}) \leq 1 + a$ for any $b \in \mathbb{N}$, this result tells us the values of $b$ for which $χ_\ell(K_{a,b})$ is as large as possible and far from $χ(K_{a,b})=2$. In this paper we seek to understand when $χ_\ell(G \square K_{a,b})$ is far from $χ(G \square K_{a,b}) = \max \{χ(G), 2 \}$. It is easy to show $χ_\ell(G \square K_{a,b}) \leq χ_\ell (G) + a$. In 2006, Borowiecki, Jendrol, Král, and Miskuf showed that this bound is attainable if $b$ is sufficiently large; specifically, $χ_\ell(G \square K_{a,b}) = χ_\ell (G) + a$ whenever $b \geq (χ_\ell(G) + a - 1)^{a|V(G)|}$. Given any graph $G$ and $a \in \mathbb{N}$, we wish to determine the smallest $b$ such that $χ_\ell(G \square K_{a,b}) = χ_\ell (G) + a$. In this paper we show that the list color function, a list analogue of the chromatic polynomial, provides the right concept and tool for making progress on this problem. Using the list color function, we prove a general improvement on Borowiecki et al.'s 2006 result, and we compute the smallest such $b$ exactly for some large families of chromatic-choosable graphs.

In 2003 Kostochka, Pelsmajer, and West introduced a list analogue of equitable coloring called equitable choosability. A $k$-assignment, $L$, for a graph $G$ assigns a list, $L(v)$, of $k$ available colors to each $v \in V(G)$, and an equitable $L$-coloring of $G$ is a proper coloring, $f$, of $G$ such that $f(v) \in L(v)$ for each $v \in V(G)$ and each color class of $f$ has size at most $\lceil |V(G)|/k \rceil$. Graph $G$ is said to be equitably $k$-choosable if an equitable $L$-coloring of $G$ exists whenever $L$ is a $k$-assignment for $G$. In this note we study the equitable choosability of complete bipartite graphs. A result of Kostochka, Pelsmajer, and West implies $K_{n,m}$ is equitably $k$-choosable if $k \geq \max \{n,m\}$ provided $K_{n,m} \neq K_{2l+1, 2l+1}$. We prove $K_{n,m}$ is equitably $k$-choosable if $m \leq \left\lceil (m+n)/k \right \rceil(k-n)$ which gives $K_{n,m}$ is equitably $k$-choosable for certain $k$ satisfying $k < \max \{n,m\}$. We also give a complete characterization of the equitable choosability of complete bipartite graphs that have a partite set of size at most 2.