arXiv++ Combinatorics

Chromatic choosability is a fundamental notion in list coloring. A graph $G$ is chromatic-choosable if its chromatic number $χ(G)$ equals its list chromatic number $χ_{\ell}(G)$. In 1990, Kostochka and Sidorenko introduced the list color function of a graph $G$, denoted by $P_{\ell}(G,m)$, which is the list-coloring analogue of its chromatic polynomial $P(G,m)$. A graph $G$ is enumeratively chromatic-choosable if $P_{\ell}(G,m)=P(G,m)$ for every $m \in \mathbb{N}$. In 2002, Ohba proved that for every graph $G$, there exists an $N \in \mathbb{N}$ such that $K_p \vee G$ is chromatic-choosable whenever $p \geq N$. Allred and Mudrock recently conjectured that an analogous statement holds for enumerative chromatic choosability. In this paper, we prove that $K_1 \vee G$ is enumeratively chromatic-choosable whenever $G$ is a theta graph. Our proof combines classical inequalities, the polynomial method, and ideas from DP (or correspondence) coloring.

Chromatic choosability is a notion of fundamental importance in list coloring. A graph $G$ is chromatic-choosable when its chromatic number, $χ(G)$, is equal to its list chromatic number $χ_{\ell}(G)$. In 1990, Kostochka and Sidorenko introduced the list color function of a graph $G$, denoted $P_{\ell}(G,m)$, which is the list analogue of the chromatic polynomial of $G$, $P(G,m)$. A graph $G$ is said to be enumeratively chromatic-choosable when $P_{\ell}(G,m)=P(G,m)$ for every $m \in \mathbb{N}$. Theta graphs and their generalizations have played an important role in graph coloring problems over the years; for example, they appear in the characterization of chromatic-choosable graphs with chromatic number 2. In this paper we characterize the enumeratively chromatic-choosable theta graphs. Our proof utilizes ideas from DP-coloring (a.k.a. correspondence coloring), providing yet another example of how the more general setting of DP-coloring can be leveraged to attack a problem in list coloring.