arXiv++ Combinatorics

The palindromic length of a finite word $w$ is defined as the minimal number of palindromes such that their product is $w$. Clearly, this function may take different values depending on if we consider $w$ as an element a free semigroup or of a free group: for example, in the free semigroup, the palindromic length of $abca$ is 4 (here every letter is a palindrome), and in the free group, it is 3 since $abca=(aba)(a^{-1}a^{-1})(aca)$. In free semigroups, the palindromic length can clearly be computed, and there are fast algorithms for that. In free groups, the question is trickier. In this paper, we characterize words in the free group whose palindromic length is 2 and 3.

The prefix palindromic length $p_{\mathbf{u}}(n)$ of an infinite word $\mathbf{u}$ is the minimal number of concatenated palindromes needed to express the prefix of length $n$ of $\mathbf{u}$. This function is surprisingly difficult to study; in particular, the conjecture that $p_{\mathbf{u}}(n)$ can be bounded only if $\mathbf{u}$ is ultimately periodic is open since 2013. A more recent conjecture concerns the prefix palindromic length of the period doubling word: it seems that it is not $2$-regular, and if it is true, this would give a rare if not unique example of a non-regular function of a $2$-automatic word. For some other $k$-automatic words, however, the prefix palindromic length is known to be $k$-regular. Here we add to the list of those words the Sierpinski word $\mathbf{s}$ and give a complete description of $p_{\mathbf{s}}(n)$.

The prefix palindromic length $\mathrm{PPL}_{\mathbf{u}}(n)$ of an infinite word $\mathbf{u}$ is the minimal number of concatenated palindromes needed to express the prefix of length $n$ of $\mathbf{u}$. Since 2013, it is still unknown if $\mathrm{PPL}_{\mathbf{u}}(n)$ is unbounded for every aperiodic infinite word $\mathbf{u}$, even though this has been proven for almost all aperiodic words. At the same time, the only well-known nontrivial infinite word for which the function $\mathrm{PPL}_{\mathbf{u}}(n)$ has been precisely computed is the Thue-Morse word $\mathbf{t}$. This word is $2$-automatic and, predictably, its function $\mathrm{PPL}_{\mathbf{t}}(n)$ is $2$-regular, but is this the case for all automatic words? In this paper, we prove that this function is $k$-regular for every $k$-automatic word containing only a finite number of palindromes. For two such words, namely the paperfolding word and the Rudin-Shapiro word, we derive a formula for this function. Our computational experiments suggest that generally this is not true: for the period-doubling word, the prefix palindromic length does not look $2$-regular, and for the Fibonacci word, it does not look Fibonacci-regular. If proven, these results would give rare (if not first) examples of a natural function of an automatic word which is not regular.

The prefix palindromic length $PPL_u(n)$ of an infinite word $u$ is the minimal number of concatenated palindromes needed to express the prefix of length $n$ of $u$. In a 2013 paper with Puzynina and Zamboni we stated the conjecture that $PPL_u(n)$ is unbounded for every infinite word $u$ which is not ultimately periodic. Up to now, the conjecture has been proven for almost all words, including all words avoiding some power $p$. However, even in that simple case the existing upper bound for the minimal number $n$ such that $PPL_u(n)>K$ is greater than any constant to the power $K$. Precise values of $PPL_u(n)$ are not known even for simplest examples like the Fibonacci word. In this paper, we give the first example of such a precise computation and compute the function of the prefix palindromic length of the Thue-Morse word, a famous test object for all functions on infinite words. It happens that this sequence is $2$-regular, which raises the question if this fact can be generalized to all automatic sequences.

We establish several recurrence relations and an explicit formula for V(n), the number of factorizations of the length-n prefix of the Fibonacci word into a (not necessarily strictly) decreasing sequence of standard Fibonacci words. In particular, we show that the sequence V(n) is the shuffle of the ceilings of two linear functions of n.

Let $A^*$ denote the free monoid generated by a finite nonempty set $A.$ In this paper we introduce a new measure of complexity of languages $L\subseteq A^*$ defined in terms of the semigroup structure on $A^*.$ For each $L\subseteq A^*,$ we define its {\it cost} $c(L)$ as the infimum of all real numbers $α$ for which there exist a language $S\subseteq A^*$ with $p_S(n)=O(n^α)$ and a positive integer $k$ with $L\subseteq S^k.$ We also define the {\it cost dimension} $d_c(L)$ as the infimum of the set of all positive integers $k$ such that $L\subseteq S^k$ for some language $S$ with $p_S(n)=O(n^{c(L)}).$ We are primarily interested in languages $L$ given by the set of factors of an infinite word $x=x_0x_1x_2\cdots \in A^ω$ of zero topological entropy, in which case $c(L)<+\infty.$ We establish the following characterisation of words of linear factor complexity: Let $x\in A^ω$ and $L=$Fac$(x)$ be the set of factors of $x.$ Then $p_x(n)=Θ(n)$ if and only $c(L)=0$ and $d_c(L)=2.$ In other words, $p_x(n)=O(n)$ if and only if Fac$(x)\subseteq S^2$ for some language $S\subseteq A^+$ of bounded complexity (meaning $\limsup p_S(n)<+\infty).$ In general the cost of a language $L$ reflects deeply the underlying combinatorial structure induced by the semigroup structure on $A^*.$ For example, in contrast to the above characterisation of languages generated by words of sub-linear complexity, there exist non factorial languages $L$ of complexity $p_L(n)=O(\log n)$ (and hence of cost equal to $0)$ and of cost dimension $+\infty.$ In this paper we investigate the cost and cost dimension of languages defined by infinite words of zero topological entropy.

We prove that if a uniformly recurrent infinite word contains as a factor any finite permutation of words from an infinite family, then either this word is periodic, or its complexity (that is, the number of factors) grows faster than linearly. This result generalizes one of the lemmas of a recent paper by de Luca and Zamboni, where it was proved that such an infinite word cannot be Sturmian.

An infinite permutation is a linear ordering of the set of natural numbers. An infinite permutation can be defined by a sequence of real numbers where only the order of elements is taken into account. In the paper we investigate a new class of {\it equidistributed} infinite permutations, that is, infinite permutations which can be defined by equidistributed sequences. Similarly to infinite words, a complexity $p(n)$ of an infinite permutation is defined as a function counting the number of its subpermutations of length $n$. For infinite words, a classical result of Morse and Hedlund, 1938, states that if the complexity of an infinite word satisfies $p(n) \leq n$ for some $n$, then the word is ultimately periodic. Hence minimal complexity of aperiodic words is equal to $n+1$, and words with such complexity are called Sturmian. For infinite permutations this does not hold: There exist aperiodic permutations with complexity functions growing arbitrarily slowly, and hence there are no permutations of minimal complexity. We show that, unlike for permutations in general, the minimal complexity of an equidistributed permutation $α$ is $p_α(n)=n$. The class of equidistributed permutations of minimal complexity coincides with the class of so-called Sturmian permutations, directly related to Sturmian words.

We consider binary rotation words generated by partitions of the unit circle to two intervals and give a precise formula for the number of such words of length n. We also give the precise asymptotics for it, which happens to be O(n^4). The result continues the line initiated by the formula for the number of all Sturmian words obtained by Lipatov in 1982, then independently by Berenstein, Kanal, Lavine and Olson in 1987, Mignosi in 1991, and then with another technique by Berstel and Pocchiola in 1993.

Given a finite word u, we define its palindromic length |u|_{pal} to be the least number n such that u=v_1v_2... v_n with each v_i a palindrome. We address the following open question: Does there exist an infinite non ultimately periodic word w and a positive integer P such that |u|_{pal}<P for each factor u of w? We give a partial answer to this question by proving that if an infinite word w satisfies the so-called (k,l)-condition for some k and l, then for each positive integer P there exists a factor u of w whose palindromic length |u|_{pal}>P. In particular, the result holds for all the k-power-free words and for the Sierpinski word.