arXiv++ Combinatorics

Browse math.CO papers from arXiv

Papers by Jarkko Peltomäki

8 paper(s) by this author · All BibTeX
2024-09-18 v2
The repetition threshold for ternary rich words
In 2017, Vesti proposed the problem of determining the repetition threshold for infinite rich words, i.e., for infinite words in which all factors of length $n$ contain $n$ distinct nonempty palindromic factors. In 2020, Currie, Mol, and Rampersad proved a conjecture of Baranwal and Shallit that the repetition threshold for binary rich words is $2 + \sqrt{2}/2$. In this paper, we prove a structure theorem for $16/7$-power-free ternary rich words. Using the structure theorem, we deduce that the repetition threshold for ternary rich words is $1 + 1/(3 - μ) \approx 2.25876324$, where $μ$ is the unique real root of the polynomial $x^3 - 2x^2 - 1$.
2020-09-07 v2
On prefix palindromic length of automatic words
Published • View PublicationBIB
The prefix palindromic length $\mathrm{PPL}_{\mathbf{u}}(n)$ of an infinite word $\mathbf{u}$ is the minimal number of concatenated palindromes needed to express the prefix of length $n$ of $\mathbf{u}$. Since 2013, it is still unknown if $\mathrm{PPL}_{\mathbf{u}}(n)$ is unbounded for every aperiodic infinite word $\mathbf{u}$, even though this has been proven for almost all aperiodic words. At the same time, the only well-known nontrivial infinite word for which the function $\mathrm{PPL}_{\mathbf{u}}(n)$ has been precisely computed is the Thue-Morse word $\mathbf{t}$. This word is $2$-automatic and, predictably, its function $\mathrm{PPL}_{\mathbf{t}}(n)$ is $2$-regular, but is this the case for all automatic words? In this paper, we prove that this function is $k$-regular for every $k$-automatic word containing only a finite number of palindromes. For two such words, namely the paperfolding word and the Rudin-Shapiro word, we derive a formula for this function. Our computational experiments suggest that generally this is not true: for the period-doubling word, the prefix palindromic length does not look $2$-regular, and for the Fibonacci word, it does not look Fibonacci-regular. If proven, these results would give rare (if not first) examples of a natural function of an automatic word which is not regular.
2019-06-03
Every nonnegative real number is an abelian critical exponent
Published in Proceedings of the 12th International Conference, WORDS, Lecture Notes in Computer Science Vol. 11682, pp. 275-285 (2019) • View PublicationBIB
The abelian critical exponent of an infinite word $w$ is defined as the maximum ratio between the exponent and the period of an abelian power occurring in $w$. It was shown by Fici et al. that the set of finite abelian critical exponents of Sturmian words coincides with the Lagrange spectrum. This spectrum contains every large enough positive real number. We construct words whose abelian critical exponents fill the remaining gaps, that is, we prove that for each nonnegative real number $θ$ there exists an infinite word having abelian critical exponent $θ$. We also extend this result to the $k$-abelian setting.
Automatic sequences based on Parry or Bertrand numeration systems
Published • View PublicationBIB
We study the factor complexity and closure properties of automatic sequences based on Parry or Bertrand numeration systems. These automatic sequences can be viewed as generalizations of the more typical $k$-automatic sequences and Pisot-automatic sequences. We show that, like $k$-automatic sequences, Parry-automatic sequences have sublinear factor complexity while there exist Bertrand-automatic sequences with superlinear factor complexity. We prove that the set of Parry-automatic sequences with respect to a fixed Parry numeration system is not closed under taking images by uniform substitutions or periodic deletion of letters. These closure properties hold for $k$-automatic sequences and Pisot-automatic sequences, so our result shows that these properties are lost when generalizing to Parry numeration systems and beyond. Moreover, we show that a multidimensional sequence is $U$-automatic with respect to a positional numeration system $U$ with regular language of numeration if and only if its $U$-kernel is finite.
2018-09-24 v2
On $k$-abelian Equivalence and Generalized Lagrange Spectra
Published in Acta Arithmetica, Vol. 194.2, 135-154 (2020) • View PublicationBIB
We study the set of $k$-abelian critical exponents of all Sturmian words. It has been proven that in the case $k = 1$ this set coincides with the Lagrange spectrum. Thus the sets obtained when $k > 1$ can be viewed as generalized Lagrange spectra. We characterize these generalized spectra in terms of the usual Lagrange spectrum and prove that when $k > 1$ the spectrum is a dense non-closed set. This is in contrast with the case $k = 1$, where the spectrum is a closed set containing a discrete part and a half-line. We describe explicitly the least accumulation points of the generalized spectra. Our geometric approach allows the study of $k$-abelian powers in Sturmian words by means of continued fractions.
Abelian Powers and Repetitions in Sturmian Words
Published • View PublicationBIB
Richomme, Saari and Zamboni (J. Lond. Math. Soc. 83: 79-95, 2011) proved that at every position of a Sturmian word starts an abelian power of exponent $k$ for every $k > 0$. We improve on this result by studying the maximum exponents of abelian powers and abelian repetitions (an abelian repetition is an analogue of a fractional power) in Sturmian words. We give a formula for computing the maximum exponent of an abelian power of abelian period $m$ starting at a given position in any Sturmian word of rotation angle $α$. vAs an analogue of the critical exponent, we introduce the abelian critical exponent $A(s_α)$ of a Sturmian word $s_α$ of angle $α$ as the quantity $A(s_α) = limsup\ k_{m}/m=limsup\ k'_{m}/m$, where $k_{m}$ (resp. $k'_{m}$) denotes the maximum exponent of an abelian power (resp.~of an abelian repetition) of abelian period $m$ (the superior limits coincide for Sturmian words). We show that $A(s_α)$ equals the Lagrange constant of the number $α$. This yields a formula for computing $A(s_α)$ in terms of the partial quotients of the continued fraction expansion of $α$. Using this formula, we prove that $A(s_α) \geq \sqrt{5}$ and that the equality holds for the Fibonacci word. We further prove that $A(s_α)$ is finite if and only if $α$ has bounded partial quotients, that is, if and only if $s_α$ is $β$-power-free for some real number $β$. Concerning the infinite Fibonacci word, we prove that: i) The longest prefix that is an abelian repetition of period $F_j$, $j>1$, has length $F_j( F_{j+1}+F_{j-1} +1)-2$ if $j$ is even or $F_j( F_{j+1}+F_{j-1} )-2$ if $j$ is odd, where $F_{j}$ is the $j$th Fibonacci number; ii) The minimum abelian period of any factor is a Fibonacci number. Further, we derive a formula for the minimum abelian periods of the finite Fibonacci words
2013-06-28 v2
Privileged Factors in the Thue-Morse Word - A Comparison of Privileged Words and Palindromes
Published in Discrete Applied Mathematics 193 (2015), 187--199 • View PublicationBIB
In this paper we study the privileged complexity function of the Thue-Morse word. We prove a recursive formula describing this function, and using the formula we show that the function is unbounded and that the values of the function have arbitrarily large gaps of zeros. This demonstrates that the privileged complexity function of an infinite word can drastically differ from its palindromic complexity function, even though there are relations between these functions. Further we study the behavior of palindromes and privileged words in infinite words and the relation between rich words and privileged words.
2012-10-11 v2
Introducing Privileged Words: Privileged Complexity of Sturmian Words
Published in Theoretical Computer Science 500 (2013) pp. 57-67 • View PublicationBIB
In this paper we study the class of so-called privileged words which have been previously considered only a little. We develop the basic properties of privileged words, which turn out to share similar properties with palindromes. Privileged words are studied in relation to previously studied classes of words, rich words, Sturmian words and episturmian words. A new characterization of Sturmian words is given in terms of privileged complexity. The privileged complexity of the Thue-Morse word is also briefly studied.