arXiv++ Combinatorics

The oriented chromatic number of a directed graph $G$ is the minimum order of an oriented graph to which $G$ has a homomorphism. The oriented chromatic number $χ_o({\cal F})$ of a graph family ${\cal F}$ is the maximum oriented chromatic number over any orientation of any graph in ${\cal F}$. For the family of hexagonal grids ${\cal H}_2$, Bielak (2006) proved that $5 \le χ_o({\cal H}_2) \le 6$. Here we close the gap by showing that $χ_o({\cal H}_2) \ge 6$.

An antimagic labeling a connected graph $G$ is a bijection from the set of edges $E(G)$ to $\{1,2,\dots,|E(G)|\}$ such that all vertex sums are pairwise distinct, where the vertex sum at vertex $v$ is the sum of the labels assigned to edges incident to $v$. A graph is called antimagic if it has an antimagic labeling. In 1990, Hartsfield and Ringel conjectured that every simple connected graph other than $K_2$ is antimagic; however, the conjecture remains open, even for trees. In this note we prove that trees whose vertices of even degree induce a path are antimagic, extending a result given by Liang, Wong, and Zhu [Discrete Math. 331 (2014) 9--14].

An antimagic labeling of a graph $G$ is an injection from $E(G)$ to $\{1,2,\dots,|E(G)|\}$ such that all vertex sums are pairwise distinct, where the vertex sum at vertex $u$ is the sum of the labels assigned to edges incident to $u$. A graph is called antimagic when it has an antimagic labeling. Hartsfield and Ringel conjectured that every simple connected graph other than $K_2$ is antimagic and the conjecture remains open even for trees. Here we prove that caterpillars are antimagic by means of an $O(n \log n)$ algorithm.

An antimagic labeling of a directed graph $D$ with $m$ arcs is a bijection from the set of arcs of $D$ to $\{1,\dots,m\}$ such that all oriented vertex sums of vertices in $D$ are pairwise distinct, where the oriented vertex sum of a vertex $u$ is the sum of labels of all arcs entering $u$ minus the sum of labels of all arcs leaving $u$. Hefetz, Mütze, and Schwartz conjectured that every connected graph admits an antimagic orientation, where an antimagic orientation of a graph $G$ is an orientation of $G$ which has an antimagic labeling. We use a constructive technique to prove that caterpillars, a well-known subclass of trees, have antimagic orientations.

A $k$-antimagic labeling of a graph $G$ is an injection from $E(G)$ to $\{1,2,\dots,|E(G)|+k\}$ such that all vertex sums are pairwise distinct, where the vertex sum at vertex $u$ is the sum of the labels assigned to edges incident to $u$. We call a graph $k$-antimagic when it has a $k$-antimagic labeling, and antimagic when it is 0-antimagic. Hartsfield and Ringel conjectured that every simple connected graph other than $K_2$ is antimagic, but the conjecture is still open even for trees. Here we study $k$-antimagic labelings of caterpillars, which are defined as trees the removal of whose leaves produces a path, called its spine. As a general result, we use constructive techniques to prove that any caterpillar of order $n$ is $(\lfloor (n-1)/2 \rfloor - 2)$-antimagic. Furthermore, if $C$ is a caterpillar with a spine of order $s$, we prove that when $C$ has at least $\lfloor (3s+1)/2 \rfloor$ leaves or $\lfloor (s-1)/2 \rfloor$ consecutive vertices of degree at most 2 at one end of a longest path, then $C$ is antimagic. As a consequence of a result by Wong and Zhu, we also prove that if $p$ is a prime number, any caterpillar with a spine of order $p$, $p-1$ or $p-2$ is $1$-antimagic.

A $d$-distinguishing vertex (arc) labeling of a digraph is a vertex (arc) labeling using $d$ labels that is not preserved by any nontrivial automorphism. Let $ρ(T)$ ($ρ'(T)$) be the minimum size of a label class in a 2-distinguishing vertex (arc) labeling of a tournament $T$. Gluck's Theorem implies that $ρ(T) \le \lfloor n/2 \rfloor$ for any tournament $T$ of order $n$. In this paper we construct a family of tournaments $\cal H$ such that $ρ(T) \ge \lfloor n/2 \rfloor$ for any order $n$ tournament in $\cal H$. Additionally, we prove that $ρ'(T) \le \lfloor 7n/36 \rfloor + 3$ for any tournament $T$ of order $n$ and $ρ'(T) \ge \lceil n/6 \rceil$ when $T \in {\cal H}$ and has order $n$. These results answer some open questions stated by Boutin.