arXiv++ Combinatorics

Let $R$ and $B$ be two disjoint point sets in the plane with $|R|=|B|=n$. Let $\mathcal{M}=\{(r_i,b_i),i=1,2,\ldots,n\}$ be a perfect matching that matches points of $R$ with points of $B$ and maximizes $\sum_{i=1}^n\|r_i-b_i\|$, the total Euclidean distance of the matched pairs. In this paper, we prove that there exists a point $o$ of the plane (the center of $\mathcal{M}$) such that $\|r_i-o\|+\|b_i-o\|\le \sqrt{2}~\|r_i-b_i\|$ for all $i\in\{1,2,\ldots,n\}$.

Let $P$ be a set of $n$ points in $\mathbb{R}^3$ in general position, and let $RCH(P)$ be the rectilinear convex hull of $P$. In this paper we obtain an optimal $O(n\log n)$-time and $O(n)$-space algorithm to compute $RCH(P)$. We also obtain an efficient $O(n\log^2 n)$-time and $O(n\log n)$-space algorithm to compute and maintain the set of vertices of the rectilinear convex hull of $P$ as we rotate $\mathbb R^3$ around the $z$-axis. Finally we study some properties of the rectilinear convex hulls of point sets in $\mathbb{R}^3$.

An antimagic labeling a connected graph $G$ is a bijection from the set of edges $E(G)$ to $\{1,2,\dots,|E(G)|\}$ such that all vertex sums are pairwise distinct, where the vertex sum at vertex $v$ is the sum of the labels assigned to edges incident to $v$. A graph is called antimagic if it has an antimagic labeling. In 1990, Hartsfield and Ringel conjectured that every simple connected graph other than $K_2$ is antimagic; however, the conjecture remains open, even for trees. In this note we prove that trees whose vertices of even degree induce a path are antimagic, extending a result given by Liang, Wong, and Zhu [Discrete Math. 331 (2014) 9--14].

An antimagic labeling of a graph $G$ is an injection from $E(G)$ to $\{1,2,\dots,|E(G)|\}$ such that all vertex sums are pairwise distinct, where the vertex sum at vertex $u$ is the sum of the labels assigned to edges incident to $u$. A graph is called antimagic when it has an antimagic labeling. Hartsfield and Ringel conjectured that every simple connected graph other than $K_2$ is antimagic and the conjecture remains open even for trees. Here we prove that caterpillars are antimagic by means of an $O(n \log n)$ algorithm.

We study the problem of rotating a simple polygon to contain the maximum number of elements from a given point set in the plane. We consider variations of this problem where the rotation center is a given point or lies on a line segment, a line, or a polygonal chain. We also solve an extension to 3D where we rotate a polyhedron around a given point to contain the maximum number of elements from a set of points in the space.

Let $P$ be a set of $n$ points in the plane. We compute the value of $θ\in [0,2π)$ for which the rectilinear convex hull of $P$, denoted by $\mathcal{RH}_θ(P)$, has minimum (or maximum) area in optimal $O(n\log n)$ time and $O(n)$ space, improving the previous $O(n^2)$ bound. Let $\mathcal{O}$ be a set of $k$ lines through the origin sorted by slope and let $α_i$ be the sizes of the $2k$ angles defined by pairs of two consecutive lines, $i=1, \ldots , 2k$. Let $Θ_{i}=π-α_i$ and $Θ=\min\{Θ_i \colon i=1,\ldots,2k\}$. We obtain: (1) Given a set $\mathcal{O}$ such that $Θ\ge\fracπ{2}$, we provide an algorithm to compute the $\mathcal{O}$-convex hull of $P$ in optimal $O(n\log n)$ time and $O(n)$ space; If $Θ< \fracπ{2}$, the time and space complexities are $O(\frac{n}Θ\log n)$ and $O(\frac{n}Θ)$ respectively. (2) Given a set $\mathcal{O}$ such that $Θ\ge\fracπ{2}$, we compute and maintain the boundary of the ${\mathcal{O}}_θ$-convex hull of $P$ for $θ\in [0,2π)$ in $O(kn\log n)$ time and $O(kn)$ space, or if $Θ< \fracπ{2}$, in $O(k\frac{n}Θ\log n)$ time and $O(k\frac{n}Θ)$ space. (3) Finally, given a set $\mathcal{O}$ such that $Θ\ge\fracπ{2}$, we compute, in $O(kn\log n)$ time and $O(kn)$ space, the angle $θ\in [0,2π)$ such that the $\mathcal{O}_θ$-convex hull of $P$ has minimum (or maximum) area over all $θ\in [0,2π)$.

A $k$-antimagic labeling of a graph $G$ is an injection from $E(G)$ to $\{1,2,\dots,|E(G)|+k\}$ such that all vertex sums are pairwise distinct, where the vertex sum at vertex $u$ is the sum of the labels assigned to edges incident to $u$. We call a graph $k$-antimagic when it has a $k$-antimagic labeling, and antimagic when it is 0-antimagic. Hartsfield and Ringel conjectured that every simple connected graph other than $K_2$ is antimagic, but the conjecture is still open even for trees. Here we study $k$-antimagic labelings of caterpillars, which are defined as trees the removal of whose leaves produces a path, called its spine. As a general result, we use constructive techniques to prove that any caterpillar of order $n$ is $(\lfloor (n-1)/2 \rfloor - 2)$-antimagic. Furthermore, if $C$ is a caterpillar with a spine of order $s$, we prove that when $C$ has at least $\lfloor (3s+1)/2 \rfloor$ leaves or $\lfloor (s-1)/2 \rfloor$ consecutive vertices of degree at most 2 at one end of a longest path, then $C$ is antimagic. As a consequence of a result by Wong and Zhu, we also prove that if $p$ is a prime number, any caterpillar with a spine of order $p$, $p-1$ or $p-2$ is $1$-antimagic.

We say that a finite set of red and blue points in the plane in general position can be $K_{1,3}$-covered if the set can be partitioned into subsets of size $4$, with $3$ points of one color and $1$ point of the other color, in such a way that, if at each subset the fourth point is connected by straight-line segments to the same-colored points, then the resulting set of all segments has no crossings. We consider the following problem: Given a set $R$ of $r$ red points and a set $B$ of $b$ blue points in the plane in general position, how many points of $R\cup B$ can be $K_{1,3}$-covered? and we prove the following results: (1) If $r=3g+h$ and $b=3h+g$, for some non-negative integers $g$ and $h$, then there are point sets $R\cup B$, like $\{1,3\}$-equitable sets (i.e., $r=3b$ or $b=3r$) and linearly separable sets, that can be $K_{1,3}$-covered. (2) If $r=3g+h$, $b=3h+g$ and the points in $R\cup B$ are in convex position, then at least $r+b-4$ points can be $K_{1,3}$-covered, and this bound is tight. (3) There are arbitrarily large point sets $R\cup B$ in general position, with $r=b+1$, such that at most $r+b-5$ points can be $K_{1,3}$-covered. (4) If $b\le r\le 3b$, then at least $\frac{8}{9}(r+b-8)$ points of $R\cup B$ can be $K_{1,3}$-covered. For $r>3b$, there are too many red points and at least $r-3b$ of them will remain uncovered in any $K_{1,3}$-covering. Furthermore, in all the cases we provide efficient algorithms to compute the corresponding coverings.

A set of vertices $S$ \emph{resolves} a connected graph $G$ if every vertex is uniquely determined by its vector of distances to the vertices in $S$. The \emph{metric dimension} of $G$ is the minimum cardinality of a resolving set of $G$. Let $\mathcal{G}_{β,D}$ be the set of graphs with metric dimension $β$ and diameter $D$. It is well-known that the minimum order of a graph in $\mathcal{G}_{β,D}$ is exactly $β+D$. The first contribution of this paper is to characterise the graphs in $\mathcal{G}_{β,D}$ with order $β+D$ for all values of $β$ and $D$. Such a characterisation was previously only known for $D\leq2$ or $β\leq1$. The second contribution is to determine the maximum order of a graph in $\mathcal{G}_{β,D}$ for all values of $D$ and $β$. Only a weak upper bound was previously known.

A set S of vertices in a graph G resolves G if every vertex is uniquely determined by its vector of distances to the vertices in S. The metric dimension of G is the minimum cardinality of a resolving set of G. This paper studies the metric dimension of cartesian products G*H. We prove that the metric dimension of G*G is tied in a strong sense to the minimum order of a so-called doubly resolving set in G. Using bounds on the order of doubly resolving sets, we establish bounds on G*H for many examples of G and H. One of our main results is a family of graphs G with bounded metric dimension for which the metric dimension of G*G is unbounded.