arXiv++ Combinatorics

In this paper, we study the metric dimension problem in maximal outerplanar graphs. Concretely, if $β(G)$ is the metric dimension of a maximal outerplanar graph $G$ of order $n$, we prove that $2\le β(G) \le \lceil \frac{2n}{5}\rceil$ and that the bounds are tight. We also provide linear algorithms to decide whether the metric dimension of $G$ is 2 and to build a resolving set of size $\lceil \frac{2n}{5}\rceil$ for $G$. Moreover, we characterize the maximal outerplanar graphs with metric dimension 2.

A $k$-coloring of a graph $G$ is a partition of the set of vertices of $G$ into $k$ independent sets, which are called colors. A $k$-coloring is neighbor-locating if any two vertices belonging to the same color can be distinguished from each other by the colors of their respective neighbors. The neighbor-locating chromatic number $χ_{_{NL}}(G)$ is the minimum cardinality of a neighbor-locating coloring of $G$. In this paper, we determine the neighbor-locating chromatic number of paths, cycles, fans, and wheels. Moreover, a procedure to construct a neighbor-locating coloring of minimum cardinality for these families of graphs is given. We also obtain tight upper bounds on the order of trees and unicyclic graphs in terms of the neighbor-locating chromatic number. Further partial results for trees are also established.

A $k$-coloring of a graph $G$ is a $k$-partition $Π=\{S_1,\ldots,S_k\}$ of $V(G)$ into independent sets, called \emph{colors}. A $k$-coloring is called \emph{neighbor-locating} if for every pair of vertices $u,v$ belonging to the same color $S_i$, the set of colors of the neighborhood of $u$ is different from the set of colors of the neighborhood of $v$. The neighbor-locating chromatic number $χ_{_{NL}}(G)$ is the minimum cardinality of a neighbor-locating coloring of $G$. We establish some tight bounds for the neighbor-locating chromatic number of a graph, in terms of its order, maximum degree and independence number. We determine all connected graphs of order $n\geq 5$ with neighbor-locating chromatic number $n$ or $n-1$. We examine the neighbor-locating chromatic number for two graph operations: join and disjoint union, and also for two graph families: split graphs and Mycielski graphs.

A partition $Π=\{S_1,\ldots,S_k\}$ of the vertex set of a connected graph $G$ is called a \emph{resolving partition} of $G$ if for every pair of vertices $u$ and $v$, $d(u,S_j)\neq d(v,S_j)$, for some part $S_j$. The \emph{partition dimension} $β_p(G)$ is the minimum cardinality of a resolving partition of $G$. A resolving partition $Π$ is called \emph{resolving dominating} if for every vertex $v$ of $G$, $d(v,S_j)=1$, for some part $S_j$ of $Π$. The \emph{dominating partition dimension} $η_p(G)$ is the minimum cardinality of a resolving dominating partition of $G$. In this paper we show, among other results, that $β_p(G) \le η_p(G) \le β_p(G)+1$. We also characterize all connected graphs of order $n\ge7$ satisfying any of the following conditions: $η_p(G)= n$, $η_p(G)= n-1$, $η_p(G)= n-2$ and $β_p(G) = n-2$. Finally, we present some tight Nordhaus-Gaddum bounds for both the partition dimension $β_p(G)$ and the dominating partition dimension $η_p(G)$.

A set $S$ of vertices of a graph $G$ is \emph{distinguishing} if the sets of neighbors in $S$ for every pair of vertices not in $S$ are distinct. A \emph{locating-dominating set} of $G$ is a dominating distinguishing set. The \emph{location-domination number} of $G$, $λ(G)$, is the minimum cardinality of a locating-dominating set. In this work we study relationships between $λ({G})$ and $λ(\overline{G})$ for bipartite graphs. The main result is the characterization of all connected bipartite graphs $G$ satisfying $λ(\overline{G})=λ({G})+1$. To this aim, we define an edge-labeled graph $G^S$ associated with a distinguishing set $S$ that turns out to be very helpful.

Limited dominating broadcasts were proposed as a variant of dominating broadcasts, where the broadcast function is upper bounded. As a natural extension of domination, we consider dominating $2$-broadcasts along with the associated parameter, the dominating $2$-broadcast number. We prove that computing the dominating $2$-broadcast number is a NP-complete problem, but can be achieved in linear time for trees. We also give an upper bound for this parameter, that is tight for graphs as large as desired.

Dominating broadcasting is a domination-type structure that models a transmission antenna network. In this paper, we study a limited version of this structure, that was proposed as a common framework for both broadcast and classical domination. In this limited version, the broadcast function is upper bounded by an integer $k$ and the minimum cost of such function is the dominating $k$-broadcast number. Our main result is a unified upper bound on this parameter for any value of $k$ in general graphs, in terms of both $k$ and the order of the graph. We also study the computational complexity of the associated decision problem.

A dominating set $S$ of a graph is a metric-locating-dominating set if each vertex of the graph is uniquely distinguished by its distances from the elements of $S$, and the minimum cardinality of such a set is called the metric-location-domination number. In this paper, we undertake a study that, in general graphs and specific families, relates metric-locating-dominating sets to other special sets: resolving sets, dominating sets, locating-dominating sets and doubly resolving sets. We first characterize classes of trees according to certain relationships between their metric-location-domination number and their metric dimension and domination number. Then, we show different methods to transform metric-locating-dominating sets into locating-dominating sets and doubly resolving sets. Our methods produce new bounds on the minimum cardinalities of all those sets, some of them involving parameters that have not been related so far.

A partition P of the vertex set of a connected graph G is a locating partition of G if every vertex is uniquely determined by its vector of distances to the elements of P. The partition dimension of G is the minimum cardinality of a locating partition of G. A pair of vertices u,v of a graph G are called twins if they have exactly the same set of neighbors other than u and v. A twin class is a maximal set of pairwise twin vertices. The twin number of a graph G is the maximum cardinality of a twin class of G. In this paper we undertake the study of the partition dimension of a graph by also considering its twin number. This approach allows us to obtain the set of connected graphs of order n having partition dimension n-2. This set is formed by exactly 15 graphs, instead of 23, as was wrongly stated in the paper: "Discrepancies between metric dimension and partition dimension of a connected graph", published in Discrete Mathematics in 2008.

A dominating set $S$ of a graph $G$ is called locating-dominating, LD-set for short, if every vertex $v$ not in $S$ is uniquely determined by the set of neighbors of $v$ belonging to $S$. Locating-dominating sets of minimum cardinality are called $LD$-codes and the cardinality of an LD-code is the \emph{location-domination number} $λ(G)$. An LD-set $S$ of a graph $G$ is \emph{global} if it is an LD-set of both $G$ and its complement $\overline{G}$. The \emph{global location-domination number} $λ_g(G)$ is the minimum cardinality of a global LD-set of $G$. For any LD-set $S$ of a given graph $G$, the so-called \emph{S-associated graph} $G^S$ is introduced. This edge-labeled bipartite graph turns out to be very helpful to approach the study of LD-sets in graphs, particularly when $G$ is bipartite. This paper is mainly devoted to the study of relationships between global LD-sets, LD-codes and the location-domination number in a graph $G$ and its complement $\overline{G}$, when $G$ is bipartite.

A $k-$quasiperfect dominating set ($k\ge 1$) of a graph $G$ is a vertex subset $S$ such that every vertex not in $S$ is adjacent to at least one and at most k vertices in $S$. The cardinality of a minimum k-quasiperfect dominating set in $G$ is denoted by $γ_{\stackrel{}{1k}}(G)$. Those sets were first introduced by Chellali et al. (2013) as a generalization of the perfect domination concept. The quasiperfect domination chain $γ_{\stackrel{}{11}}(G)\geγ_{\stackrel{}{12}}(G)\ge\dots\geγ_{\stackrel{}{1Δ}}(G)=γ(G)$, indicates what it is lost in size when you move towards a more perfect domination. We provide an upper bound for $γ_{\stackrel{}{1k}}(T)$ in any tree $T$ and trees achieving this bound are characterized. We prove that there exist trees satisfying all the possible equalities and inequalities in this chain and a linear algorithm for computing $γ_{\stackrel{}{1k}}(T)$ in any tree is presented.

A subset $S\subseteq V$ in a graph $G=(V,E)$ is a $k$-quasiperfect dominating set (for $k\geq 1$) if every vertex not in $S$ is adjacent to at least one and at most $k$ vertices in $S$. The cardinality of a minimum $k$-quasiperfect dominating set in $G$ is denoted by $γ_ {\stackrel{}{1k}}(G)$. Those sets were first introduced by Chellali et al. (2013) as a generalization of the perfect domination concept and allow us to construct a decreasing chain of quasiperfect dominating numbers $ n \ge γ_ {\stackrel{}{11}}(G) \ge γ_ {\stackrel{}{12}}(G)\ge \ldots \ge γ_ {\stackrel{}{1Δ}}(G)=γ(G)$ in order to indicate how far is $G$ from being perfectly dominated. In this paper we study properties, existence and realization of graphs for which the chain is short, that is, $γ_ {\stackrel{}{12}}(G)=γ(G)$. Among them, one can find cographs, claw-free graphs and graphs with extremal values of $Δ(G)$.

In this work, two types of codes such that they both dominate and locate the vertices of a graph are studied. Those codes might be sets of detectors in a network or processors controlling a system whose set of responses should determine a malfunctioning processor or an intruder. Here, we present our more significant contributions on λ-codes and η-codes concerning concerning bounds, extremal values and realization theorems.

A set S of vertices of a connected graph G is convex, if for any pair of vertices u; v 2 S, every shortest path joining u and v is contained in S . The convex hull CH(S) of a set of vertices S is defined as the smallest convex set in G containing S. The set S is geodetic, if every vertex of G lies on some shortest path joining two vertices in S, and it is said to be a hull set if its convex hull is V(G). The geodetic and the hull numbers of G are the cardinality of a minimum geodetic and a minimum hull set, respectively. In this work, we investigate the behavior of both geodetic and hull sets with respect to the strong product operation for graphs. We also stablish some bounds for the geodetic number and the hull number and obtain the exact value of these parameters for a number of strong product graphs.

A set of vertices $S$ \emph{resolves} a connected graph $G$ if every vertex is uniquely determined by its vector of distances to the vertices in $S$. The \emph{metric dimension} of $G$ is the minimum cardinality of a resolving set of $G$. Let $\mathcal{G}_{β,D}$ be the set of graphs with metric dimension $β$ and diameter $D$. It is well-known that the minimum order of a graph in $\mathcal{G}_{β,D}$ is exactly $β+D$. The first contribution of this paper is to characterise the graphs in $\mathcal{G}_{β,D}$ with order $β+D$ for all values of $β$ and $D$. Such a characterisation was previously only known for $D\leq2$ or $β\leq1$. The second contribution is to determine the maximum order of a graph in $\mathcal{G}_{β,D}$ for all values of $D$ and $β$. Only a weak upper bound was previously known.

A set S of vertices in a graph G resolves G if every vertex is uniquely determined by its vector of distances to the vertices in S. The metric dimension of G is the minimum cardinality of a resolving set of G. This paper studies the metric dimension of cartesian products G*H. We prove that the metric dimension of G*G is tied in a strong sense to the minimum order of a so-called doubly resolving set in G. Using bounds on the order of doubly resolving sets, we establish bounds on G*H for many examples of G and H. One of our main results is a family of graphs G with bounded metric dimension for which the metric dimension of G*G is unbounded.