arXiv++ Combinatorics

There are precisely four arrangements of two point-hyperplane anti-flags. We consider the corresponding relations on the set of such anti-flags and show that each of them can be recovered from any other except in one special case. If the field consists of two elements, then one of the relations cannot be used to recover each of the remaining three. This is related to a bijection between anti-flags and exterior points of the hyperbolic polar space which exists in this case.

We give a bijection between the point-hyperplane antiflags of $V(n, 2)$ and the non-singular points of $V(2n, 2)$ with respect to a hyperbolic quadric. With the help of this bijection, we give a description of the strongly regular graph $NO^+(2n, 2)$ in $V(2n, 2)$. We also describe a graph in $V(2n, 2)$ that was recently defined by Stanley and Takeda in $V(n, 2)$.

In this paper we propose a definition of regularity suited for polar spaces of infinite rank and we investigate to which extent properties of regular polar spaces of finite rank can be generalized to polar spaces of infinite rank.

In this paper we consider a family of projective embeddings of the geometry $Γ= A_{n,\{1,n\}}(F)$ of point-hyperplanes flags of the projective geometry $Σ= PG(n,F)$. The natural embedding $\varepsilon_{mathrm{nat}}$ is one of them. It maps every point-hyperplane flag $(p,H)$ of $Σ$ onto the vector-line $\langle x\otimesξ\rangle$, where $x$ is a representative vector of $p$ and $ξ$ is a linear functional describing $H$. The other embeddings have been discovered by Thas and Van Maldeghem (2000) for the case $n = 2$ and later generalized to any $n$ by De Schepper, Schillewaert and Van Maldeghem (2023). They are obtained as twistings of $\varepsilon_{\mathrm{nat}}$ by non-trivial automorphisms of $F$. Explicitly, for $σ\in Aut(F)\setminus\{\mathrm{id}_F\}$, the twisting $\varepsilon_σ$ of $\varepsilon_{\mathrm{nat}}$ by $σ$ maps $(p,H)$ onto $\langle xσ\otimes ξ\rangle$. We shall prove that, when $|Aut(F)| > 1$ a geometric hyperplane $\cal H$ of $Γ$ arises from $\varepsilon_{\mathrm{nat}}$ and one of its twistings or from two distinct twistings of $\varepsilon_{\mathrm{nat}}$ if and only if ${\cal H} = \{(p,H)\in Γ\mid p\in A \mbox{ or } a \in H\}$ for a possibly non-incident point-hyperplane pair $(a,A)$ of $Σ$. We call these hyperplanes quasi-singular hyperplanes. With the help of this result we shall prove that if $|Aut(F)| > 1$ then $Γ$ admits no absolutely universal embedding.

In this paper we investigate hyperplanes of the point-line geometry $\mathit{A}_{n,\{1,n\}}(\mathbb{F})$ of point-hyerplane flags of the projective geometry $\mathrm{PG}(n,\mathbb{F})$. Renouncing a complete classification, which is not yet within our reach, we describe the hyperplanes which arise from the natural embedding of $\mathit{A}_{n,\{1,n\}}(\mathbb{F})$, that is the embedding which yields the adjoint representation of $\mathrm{SL}(n+1,\mathbb{F})$. The information we shall collect on these hyperplanes will allow us to prove that all hyperplanes of $\mathit{A}_{n,\{1,n\}}(\mathbb{F})$ are maximal subspaces of $\mathit{A}_{n,\{1,n\}}(\mathbb{F})$. Hyperplanes of $\mathit{A}_{n,\{1,n\}}(\mathbb{F})$ can also be contructed starting from suitable line-spreads of $\mathrm{PG}(n,\mathbb{F})$ (provided that $\mathrm{PG}(n,\mathbb{F})$ admits line-spreads, of course). Explicitly, let $\mathfrak{S}$ be a line-spread of $\mathrm{PG}(n,\mathbb{K})$ satisfying certain conditions to be stated in this paper (which hold for all line-spreads obtained via the most popular constructions). The set of point-hyperplane flags $(p,\mathit{H})$ of $\mathrm{PG}(n,\mathbb{F})$ such that $\mathit{H}$ contains the member of $\mathfrak{S}$ through the point $p$ is a hyperplane of $\mathit{A}_{n,\{1,n\}}(\mathbb{F})$. We call these hyperplanes {\em hyperplanes of spread type}. Many of them arise from the natural embedding. We don't know if this is the case for all of them.

We consider various regular graphs defined on the set of elements of given rank of a finite polar space. It is likely that no two such graphs, of the same kind but defined for different ranks, can have the same degree. We shall prove this conjecture under the hypothesis that the considered rank are not too small.

Let $X_n(K)$ be a building of Coxeter type $X_n = A_n$ or $X_n = D_n$ defined over a given division ring $K$ (a field when $X_n = D_n$). For a non-connected set $J$ of nodes of the diagram $X_n$, let $Γ(K) = Gr_J(X_n(K))$ be the $J$-Grassmannian of $X_n(K)$. We prove that $Γ(K)$ cannot be generated over any proper sub-division ring $K_0$ of $K$. As a consequence, the generating rank of $Γ(K)$ is infinite when $K$ is not finitely generated. In particular, if $K$ is the algebraic closure of a finite field of prime order then the generating rank of $Gr_{1,n}(A_n(K))$ is infinite, although its embedding rank is either $(n+1)^2-1$ or $(n+1)^2$.

The rank of a point-line geometry G is usually defined as the generating rank of G, namely the minimal cardinality of a generating set. However, when the subspace lattice of G satisfies the Exchange Property we can also try a different definition: consider all chains of subspaces of G and take the least upper bound of their lengths as the rank of G. If G is finitely generated then these two definitions yield the same number. On the other hand, as we shall show in this paper, if infinitely many points are needed to generate G then the rank as defined in the latter way is often (perhaps always) larger than the generating rank. So, if we like to keep the first definition we should accordingly discard the second one or modify it. We can modify it as follows: consider only well ordered chains instead of arbitrary chains. As we shall prove, the least upper bound of the lengths of well ordered chains of subspaces is indeed equal to the generating rank. According to this result, the (possibly infinite) rank of a polar space can be characterized as the least upper bound of the lengths of well ordered chains of singular subspaces; referring to arbitrary chains would be an error.

Consider the Grassmann graph formed by $k$-dimensional subspaces of an $n$-dimensional vector space over the field of $q$ elements ($1<k<n-1$) and denote by $Π(n,k)_q$ the restriction of this graph to the set of projective $[n,k]_q$ codes. In the case when $q\ge \binom{n}{2}$, we show that the graph $Π(n,k)_q$ is connected, its diameter is equal to the diameter of the Grassmann graph and the distance between any two vertices coincides with the distance between these vertices in the Grassmann graph. Also, we give some observations concerning the graphs of simplex codes. For example, binary simplex codes of dimension $3$ are precisely maximal singular subspaces of a non-degenerate quadratic form.

Given an $n$-dimensional vector space $V$ over a field $\mathbb K$, let $2\leq k < n$. There is a natural correspondence between the alternating $k$-linear forms $\varphi$ of $V$ and the linear functionals $f$ of $\bigwedge^kV$. Let $\varepsilon_k:{\mathcal G}_k(V)\rightarrow {\mathrm{PG}}(\bigwedge^kV)$ be the Plucker embedding of the $k$-Grassmannian ${\mathcal G}_k(V)$ of $V$. Then $\varepsilon_k^{-1}(\ker(f)\cap\varepsilon_k(\mathcal{G}_k(V)))$ is a hyperplane of the point-line geometry ${\mathcal G}_k(V)$. All hyperplanes of ${\mathcal G}_k(V)$ can be obtained in this way. For a hyperplane $H$ of ${\mathcal G}_k(V)$, let $R^\uparrow(H)$ be the subspace of ${\mathcal G}_{k-1}(V)$ formed by the $(k-1)$-subspaces $A\subset V$ such that $H$ contains all $k$-subspaces that contain $A$. In other words, if $\varphi$ is the (unique modulo a scalar) alternating $k$-linear form defining $H$, then the elements of $R^\uparrow(H)$ are the $(k-1)$-subspaces $A = \langle a_1,\ldots, a_{k-1}\rangle$ of $V$ such that $\varphi(a_1,\ldots, a_{k-1},x) = 0$ for all $x\in V$. When $n-k$ is even it might be that $R^\uparrow(H) = \emptyset$. When $n-k$ is odd, then $R^\uparrow(H) \neq \emptyset$, since every $(k-2)$-subspace of $V$ is contained in at least one member of $R^\uparrow(H)$. If every $(k-2)$-subspace of $V$ is contained in precisely one member of $R^\uparrow(H)$ we say that $R^\uparrow(H)$ is spread-like. In this paper we obtain some results on $R^\uparrow(H)$ which answer some open questions from the literature and suggest the conjecture that, if $n-k$ is even and at least $4$, then $R^\uparrow(H) \neq \emptyset$ but for one exception with ${\mathbb K}\leq{\mathbb R}$ and $(n,k) = (7,3)$, while if $n-k$ is odd and at least $5$ then $R^\uparrow(H)$ is never spread-like.

Polar Grassmann codes of orthogonal type have been introduced in I. Cardinali and L. Giuzzi, \emph{Codes and caps from orthogonal Grassmannians}, {Finite Fields Appl.} {\bf 24} (2013), 148-169. They are subcodes of the Grassmann code arising from the projective system defined by the Plücker embedding of a polar Grassmannian of orthogonal type. In the present paper we fully determine the minimum distance of line polar Grassmann Codes of orthogonal type for $q$ odd.

If a geometry $Γ$ is isomorphic to the residue of a point $A$ of a shadow geometry of a spherical building $Δ$, a representation $\varepsilon_Δ^A$ of $Γ$ can be given in the unipotent radical $U_{A^*}$ of the stabilizer in $\mathrm{Aut}(Δ)$ of a flag $A^*$ of $Δ$ opposite to $A$, every element of $Γ$ being mapped onto a suitable subgroup of $U_{A^*}$. We call such a representation a unipotent representation. We develope some theory for unipotent representations and we examine a number of interesting cases, where a projective embedding of a Lie incidence geometry $Γ$ can be obtained as a quotient of a suitable unipotent representation $\varepsilon_Δ^A$ by factorizing over the derived subgroup of $U_{A^*}$, while $\varepsilon^A_Δ$ itself is not a proper quotient of any other representation of $Γ$.

We study geometries that arise from the natural $G_2(K)$ action on the geometry of one-dimensional subspaces, of nonsingular two-dimensional subspaces, and of nonsingular three-dimensional subspaces of the building geometry of type $C_3(K)$ where $K$ is a perfect field of characteristic 2. One of these geometries is intransitive in such a way that the non-standard geometric covering theory by the first and the last author is not applicable. In this paper we introduce the concept of fused amalgams in order to extend the geometric covering theory so that it applies to that geometry. This yields an interesting new amalgamation result for the group $G_2(K)$.