Papers by Atsuhiro Nakamoto
5 paper(s) by this author
· All BibTeX
The square of a subcubic planar graph without a 5-cycle is 7-choosable
The square of a graph $G$, denoted $G^2$, has the same vertex set as $G$ and has an edge between two vertices if the distance between them in $G$ is at most $2$. Thomassen [12] showed that $χ(G^2) \leq 7$ if $G$ is a subcubic planar graph. A natural question is whether $χ_{\ell}(G^2) \leq 7$ or not if $G$ is a subcubic planar graph. Recently Kim and Lian [11] showed that $χ_{\ell}(G^2) \leq 7$ if $G$ is a subcubic planar graph of girth at least 6. And Jin, Kang, and Kim [10] showed that $χ_{\ell}(G^2) \leq 7$ if $G$ is a subcubic planar graph without 4-cycles and 5-cycles. In this paper, we show that the square of a subcubic planar graph without 5-cycles is 7-choosable, which improves the results of [10] and [11].
Colouring normal quadrangulations of projective spaces
Youngs proved that every non-bipartite quadrangulation of the projective plane $\mathbb{R}\mathrm{P}^2$ is 4-chromatic. Kaiser and Stehlík [J. Combin. Theory Ser. B 113 (2015), 1-17] generalised the notion of a quadrangulation to higher dimensions and extended Youngs' theorem by proving that every non-bipartite quadrangulation of the $d$-dimensional projective space $\mathbb{R}\mathrm{P}^d$ with $d \geq 2$ has chromatic number at least $d+2$. On the other hand, Hachimori et al. [European. J. Combin. 125 (2025), 104089] defined another kind of high-dimensional quadrangulation, called a normal quadrangulation. They proved that if a non-bipartite normal quadrangulation $G$ of $\mathbb{R}\mathrm{P}^d$ with any $d \geq 2$ satisfies a certain geometric condition, then $G$ is $4$-chromatic, and asked whether the geometric condition can be removed from the result. In this paper, we give a negative solution to their problem for the case $d=3$, proving that there exist 3-dimensional normal quadrangulations of $\mathbb{R}\mathrm{P}^3$ whose chromatic number is arbitrarily large. Moreover, we prove that no normal quadrangulation of $\mathbb{R}\mathrm{P}^d$ with any $d \geq 2$ has chromatic number $3$.
Triangulated spheres with holes in triangulated surfaces
Let $\mathbb{S}_h$ denote a sphere with $h$ holes. Given a triangulation $G$ of a surface $\mathbb{M}$, we consider the question of when $G$ contains a spanning subgraph $H$ such that $H$ is a triangulated $\mathbb{S}_h$. We give a new short proof of a theorem of Nevo and Tarabykin that every triangulation $G$ of the torus contains a spanning subgraph which is a triangulated cylinder. For arbitrary surfaces, we prove that every high facewidth triangulation of a surface with $h$ handles contains a spanning subgraph which is a triangulated $\mathbb{S}_{2h}$. We also prove that for every $0 \leq g' < g$ and $w \in \mathbb{N}$, there exists a triangulation of facewidth at least $w$ of a surface of Euler genus $g$ that does not have a spanning subgraph which is a triangulated $\mathbb{S}_{g'}$. Our results are motivated by, and have applications for, rigidity questions in the plane.
A Note on $4$-colorings of Quadrangulations
Let $G$ be a quadrangulation on an orientable surface and let $g$ be a proper vertex-$4$-coloring of $G$. A face $F$ of $G$ is said to be a rainbow-face if all four distinct colors appear on its boundary. A $(c_1,c_2,c_3,c_4)$-face in $G$ is a rainbow face with colors $c_i$, $i=1,2,3,4$ on the boundary in clockwise order. We show that the number of $(c_1,c_2,c_3,c_4)$-faces in $G$ equals the number of $(c_4,c_3,c_2,c_1)$-faces. This implies in particular that the number of rainbow-faces of $G$ is even.
Irreducible triangulations of surfaces with boundary
Published in Graphs and Combinatorics 29(6):1675-1688, 2013
• View Publication
• BIB
A triangulation of a surface is irreducible if no edge can be contracted to produce a triangulation of the same surface. In this paper, we investigate irreducible triangulations of surfaces with boundary. We prove that the number of vertices of an irreducible triangulation of a (possibly non-orientable) surface of genus g>=0 with b>=0 boundaries is O(g+b). So far, the result was known only for surfaces without boundary (b=0). While our technique yields a worse constant in the O(.) notation, the present proof is elementary, and simpler than the previous ones in the case of surfaces without boundary.