arXiv++ Combinatorics

A shuffle square is a word consisting of two shuffled copies of the same word. For instance, the Turkish word $\mathtt{\color{red}{ik}\color{blue}{i}\color{red}{li}\color{blue}{kli}}$ (binary in English) is a shuffle square, as it can be split into two copies of the word $\mathtt{ikli}$. We explore a representation of shuffle squares in terms of \emph{ordered nest-free graphs} and demonstrate the usefulness of this approach by applying it to several families of binary words. Among others, we characterize shuffle squares with four and five runs, as well as shuffle squares with all $\mathtt1$-runs of length one (and with the $\mathtt1$'s alternating between the two copies). In our main result we provide quite general sufficient conditions for a binary word not to be a shuffle square. In particular, it follows that binary words of the type $(\mathtt{1001})^n$, $n$ odd, are not shuffle squares. We complement it by showing that all other words whose every $\mathtt{1}$-run has length one or two, while every $\mathtt{0}$-run has length two, are shuffle squares. We also provide a counterexample to a believable stipulation that binary words of the form $\mathtt1^{m}\mathtt0^{m-2}\mathtt1^{m-4}\cdots$, $m$ odd, are far from being shuffle squares (the distance measured by the minimum number of letters one has to delete in order to turn a word into a shuffle square).

A \emph{tangram} is a word in which every letter occurs an even number of times. Such word can be cut into parts that can be arranged into two identical words. The minimum number of cuts needed is called the \emph{cut number} of a tangram. For example, the word $\mathtt{\color{red}{0102}\color{blue}{0102}}$ is a tangram with cut number one, while the word $\mathtt{\color{red}{01}\color{blue}{01023}\color{red}{023}}$ is a tangram with cut number two. Clearly, tangrams with cut number one coincide with the well known family of words, known as \emph{squares}, having the form $UU$ for some nonempty word $U$. A word $W$ \emph{avoids} a word $T$ if it is not possible to write $W=ATB$, for any words $A$ and $B$ (possibly empty). The famous 1906 theorem of Thue asserts that there exist arbitrarily long words avoiding squares over alphabet with just \emph{three} letters. Given a fixed number $k\geqslant 1$, how many letters are needed to avoid tangrams with the cut number at most $k$? Let $t(k)$ denote the minimum size of an alphabet needed for that purpose. By Thue's result we have $t(1)=3$, which easily implies $t(2)=3$. Curiously, these are currently the only known exact values of this function. In our main result we prove that $t(k)=Θ(\log_2k)$. The proof uses \emph{entropy compression} argument and \emph{Zimin words}. By using a different method we prove that $t(k)\leqslant k+1$ for all $k\geqslant 4$, which gives more exact estimates for small values of $k$. The proof makes use of \emph{Dejean words} and a curious property of \emph{Gauss words}, which is perhaps of independent interest.

We study decompositions of words into subwords that are in some sense similar, which means that one subword may be obtained from the other by a relatively simple transformation. Our main inspiration are shuffle squares, an intriguing class of words arising in various contexts, from purely combinatorial to more applied, like modeling concurrent processes or DNA sequencing. These words can be split into two parts that are just identical. For example, $ACTACATAGG$ is a shuffle square consisting of two copies of the word $ACTAG$. Of course, each letter must appear any even number of times in each shuffle square. We call words with that property even. We mainly discuss new problems concerning generalized shuffle squares. We propose a number of conjectures and provide some initial results towards them. We prove that every binary word is a cyclic shuffle square, meaning that it splits into two subwords, one of which is a~cyclic permutation of the other. The same statement is no longer true over larger alphabets, but it seems plausible that a similar property should hold with slightly less restricted permutation classes. For instance, we conjecture that every even ternary word is a dihedral shuffle square, which means that it splits into two subwords, one of which can be obtained from the other by a permutation corresponding to the~symmetry of a~regular polygon. We propose a general conjecture stating that a linear number of permutations is sufficient to express all even $k$-ary words as generalized shuffle squares. Our discussion is complemented by some enumerative and computational experiments. In particular, we disprove our former conjecture stating that every even binary word can be turned into a shuffle square by a cyclic permutation. The smallest counterexample has length $24$. We call words of this type shuffle anti-squares. We determined all of them up to the length $28$.

A word is square-free if it does not contain a nonempty word of the form $XX$ as a factor. A famous 1906 result of Thue asserts that there exist arbitrarily long square-free words over a $3$-letter alphabet. We study square-free words with additional properties involving single-letter deletions and extensions of words. A square-free word is steady if it remains square-free after deletion of any single letter. We prove that there exist infinitely many steady words over a $4$-letter alphabet. We also demonstrate that one may construct steady words of any length by picking letters from arbitrary alphabets of size $7$ assigned to the positions of the constructed word. We conjecture that both bounds can be lowered to $4$, which is best possible. In the opposite direction, we consider square-free words that remain square-free after insertion of a single (suitably chosen) letter at every possible position in the word. We call them bifurcate. We prove a somewhat surprising fact, that over a fixed alphabet with at least three letters, every steady word is bifurcate. We also consider families of bifurcate words possessing a natural tree structure. In particular, we prove that there exists an infinite tree of doubly infinite bifurcate words over alphabet of size $12$.

A word is square-free if it does not contain nonempty factors of the form $XX$. In 1906 Thue proved that there exist arbitrarily long square-free words over a $3$-letter alphabet. It was proved recently [7] that among these words there are infinitely many extremal ones, that is, having a square in every single-letter extension. We study diverse problems concerning extensions of words preserving the property of avoiding squares. Our main motivation is the conjecture stating that there are no extremal words over a $4$-letter alphabet. We also investigate a natural recursive procedure of generating square-free words by a single-letter right-most extension. We present the results of computer experiments supporting a supposition that this procedure gives an infinite square-free word over any alphabet of size at least three.