arXiv++ Combinatorics

Arboricity and degeneracy are two fundamental and closely related graph parameters that measure the sparsity of a graph. Every $k$-degenerate graph is $k$-arboric, but some $k$-arboric graphs are only $(2k-1)$-degenerate. However, every maximal $k$-arboric multigraph with $n$ vertices and every maximal $k$-degenerate multigraph with $n$ vertices has exactly $k(n-1)$ edges. These basic observations lead to a natural structural question: How far are $k$-arboric graphs from being $k$-degenerate? We answer this question by showing that: By at most a $(k-1)$-bounded-degree graph apart. More specifically, we prove that a $k$-arboric multigraph admits a $(k,k-1)$-decomposition, that is, its edges can be partitioned into two multisets such that one spans a $k$-degenerate multigraph and the other spans a multigraph with every vertex having degree at most $k-1$. Moreover, we provide a complete characterisation of all possible such decomposition types. Namely, for any integers $k \ge 1$ and $d,h \ge 0$ we show that every $k$-arboric multigraph admits a $(d,h)$-decomposition if and only if $d\geq k$ and $d+h\geq 2k-1$. Our proofs are constructive and we present a polynomial time algorithm that produces such decompositions. By contrast, we show that related decision problems for general graphs (without constraints on the arboricity) are NP-complete.

A strong majority edge colouring of a graph $G$ is an edge colouring in which, for every edge $e$ and every colour $α$, at most half the edges adjacent to $e$ receive colour $α$. Like many related colouring notions, it admits a natural interpretation as a colouring problem for an associated hypergraph. Somewhat surprisingly, although the corresponding hypergraph may have arbitrarily large vertex degrees, a universal finite upper bound on the sufficient number of colours in a strong majority edge colouring exists under a natural modest minimum degree assumption, unlike in several other closely related majority concepts. We in particular prove that every graph $G$ with minimum degree $δ\ge5$ admits a strong majority edge colouring with three colours, improving both the previously known bound $δ\ge9$ for three colours and the result showing that four colours suffice whenever $δ\ge5$. Our result is best possible with respect to the number of colours and nearly best possible with respect to the minimum degree assumption, as we exhibit the latter cannot be decreased below $4$. We also introduce a more general framework of strong $1/k$-majority edge colourings and establish corresponding bounds for this setting.

The conflict-free chromatic index of a graph $G$ is the minimum number of colours in an edge colouring of $G$ such that the neighbourhood of every edge contains a colour appearing exactly once. Its vertex analogue is the conflict-free chromatic number. These two parameters naturally coincide when the second is applied to the line graph of $G$. It is known that two variants of the latter parameter exhibit substantially different behaviour. For closed vertex neighbourhoods, where each vertex belongs to its own neighbourhood, it is known that $O(\ln^2 Δ)$ colours suffice, where $Δ$ denotes the maximum degree of $G$, and this bound is tight in order. In contrast, for open neighbourhoods, the corresponding parameter can be as large as $Δ+1$, but is bounded above by $O(\ln^{2+\varepsilon} Δ)$ for claw-free graphs. Since line graphs are claw-free, this yields the best known general upper bound for the edge analogue in the setting of open neighbourhoods. For closed edge neighbourhoods, a stronger general upper bound of $3\log_2 Δ+ 4$ is known. In this paper, we show that for both variants, the conflict-free chromatic index is bounded above by $(1+o(1))\log_2 Δ$. Since complete graphs require at least $(1 - o(1)) \log_2 Δ$ colours in the closed as well as the open setting, our result is asymptotically tight in order and in the leading constant. Moreover, we strengthen this conclusion by showing that $(1 - o(1)) \log_2 Δ$ colours are also typically necessary, as we prove this asymptotically almost surely for random graphs in both dense and relatively sparse regimes. Our proofs combine the probabilistic method with deterministic graph decomposition techniques, as well as new results relating the parameters under consideration with the chromatic number of a graph.

Let $\mathcal{F}=\{A_1,A_2,\ldots,A_k\}$ be a collection of finite arithmetic progressions, where each $A_d$ is an initial segment of the set $D_d=\{d,2d,3d,\ldots\}$ of consecutive multiples of a positive integer $d$. Let $m(\mathcal{F})$ denote the minimum length of an interval containing pairwise disjoint \emph{shifted} copies of all members of the family $\mathcal{F}$. We study this parameter in the following two cases: for a fixed positive integer $n$, (1) each progression in $\mathcal{F}$ has the form $A_d=D_d\cap\{1,2,\ldots,n\}$, and (2) all progressions $A_d$ of $\mathcal{F}$ have the same size $n$, that is, $A_d=D_d\cap \{1,2,\ldots, nd\}$. We in particular derive the following asymptotic estimates. In case (1), when $k=n$, we get $m(\mathcal{F})=Θ(n^{3/2}/\ln n)$. In case (2), when $k=n$, we get $m(\mathcal{F})=Θ(n^3/\ln n)$, while if $k>k_0(n)$, then $m(\mathcal{F}) < 3kn$. In both cases we additionally determine $m(\mathcal{F})$ asymptotically or settle its order of magnitude for all $k<n$.

An edge colouring $c$ of a graph $G$ is called conflic-free if every non-isolated edge of $G$ has a uniquely coloured neighbour in its open edge neighbourhood. The least number of colours admitting such a colouring is denoted by $χ'_{\rm OCF}(G)$, or $χ'_{\rm pOCF}(G)$ if we additionally require $c$ to be proper. Our main result implies in particular that $χ'_{\rm OCF}(G) \le \log_2 Δ+ O(\ln\lnΔ)$ for nearly regular graphs $G$ with maximum degree $Δ$, which is asymptotically optimal, as witnessed by the complete graphs. For proper colourings, we moreover show that $χ'_{\rm pOCF}(G) \le Δ+ O(\ln Δ)$ in the same regime. These results improve existing bounds stemming from related colouring models and transfer directly to random graphs' setting. The proofs combine decomposition techniques with probabilistic arguments and structural properties of edge neighbourhoods.

An ordered $r$-uniform matching of size $n$ is a collection of $n$ pairwise disjoint $r$-subsets of a linearly ordered set of $rn$ vertices. For $n=2$, such a matching is called an $r$-pattern, as it represents one of $\tfrac12\binom{2r}r$ ways two disjoint edges may intertwine. Given a set $\mathcal{P}$ of $r$-patterns, a $\mathcal{P}$-clique is a matching with all pairs of edges belonging to $\mathcal{P}$. In this paper we determine the order of magnitude of the size of a largest $\mathcal{P}$-clique in a random ordered $r$-uniform matching for several sets $\mathcal{P}$, including all sets of size $|\mathcal{P}|\le2$ and the set $\mathcal{R}^{(r)}$ of all $2^{r-1}$ $r$-partite $r$-patterns.

An ordered $r$-uniform matching of size $n$ is a collection of $n$ pairwise disjoint $r$-subsets of a linearly ordered set of $rn$ vertices. For $n=2$, such a matching is called an $r$-pattern, as it represents one of $\tfrac12\binom{2r}r$ ways two disjoint edges may intertwine. Given a set $\mathcal{P}$ of $r$-patterns, a $\mathcal{P}$-clique is a matching with all pairs of edges order-isomorphic to a member of $\mathcal{P}$. In this paper we are interested in the size of a largest $\mathcal{P}$-clique in a random ordered $r$-uniform matching selected uniformly from all such matchings on a fixed vertex set $[rn]$. We determine this size (up to multiplicative constants) for several sets $\mathcal{P}$, including all sets of size $|\mathcal{P}|\le2$, the set $\mathcal{R}^{(r)}$ of all $r$-partite patterns, as well as sets $\mathcal{P}$ enjoying a Boolean-like, symmetric structure.

We investigate possible list extensions of generalised majority edge colourings of graphs and provide several results concerning these. Given a graph $G=(V,E)$, a list assignment $L:E\to 2^C$ and some level of majority tolerance $α\in(0,1)$, an $α$-majority $L$-colouring of $G$ is a colouring $ω:E\to C$ from the given lists such that for every $v\in V$ and each $c\in C$, the number of edges coloured $c$ which are incident with $v$ does not exceed $α\cdot d(v)$. We present a simple argument implying that for every integer $k\geq 2$, each graph with minimum degree $δ\geq 2k^2-2k$ admits a $1/k$-majority $L$-colouring from any assignment of lists of size $k+1$. This almost matches the best result in a non-list setting and solves a conjecture posed for the basic majority edge colourings, i.e. for $k=2$, from lists. We further discuss restrictions which permit obtaining corresponding results in a more general setting, i.e. for diversified $α=α(c)$ majority tolerances for distinct colours $c\in C$. Consider a list assignment $L:E\to 2^C$ with $\sum_{c\in L(e)}α(c)\geq 1+\varepsilon$ for each edge $e$, and suppose that $α(c)\geq a$ for every $c$ or $|L(e)|\leq\ell$ for all edges $e$, where $a\in(0,1)$, $\varepsilon>0$, $\ell\in\mathbb{N}$ are any given constants. Then we in particular show that there exists an $α$-majority $L$-colouring of $G$ from any such list assignment, provided that $δ(G)=Ω(a^{-1}\varepsilon^{-2}\ln(a\varepsilon)^{-1})$ or $δ=Ω(\ell^2\varepsilon^{-2})$, respectively. We also strengthen these bounds within a setting where each edge is associated to a list of colours with a fixed vector of majority tolerances, applicable also in a general non-list case.

Given a hypergraph $H=(V,E)$, define for every edge $e\in E$ a linear expression with arguments corresponding with the vertices. Next, let the polynomial $p_H$ be the product of such linear expressions for all edges. Our main goal was to find a relationship between the Alon-Tarsi number of $p_H$ and the edge density of $H$. We prove that $AT(p_H)=\lceil ed(H)\rceil+1$ if all the coefficients in $p_H$ are equal to $1$. Our main result is that, no matter what those coefficients are, they can be permuted within the edges so that for the resulting polynomial $p_H^\prime$, $AT(p_H^\prime)\leq 2\lceil ed(H)\rceil+1$ holds. We conjecture that, in fact, permuting the coefficients is not necessary. If this were true, then in particular a significant generalization of the famous 1-2-3 Conjecture would follow.

Let $G$ be a graph of maximum degree $Δ$ which does not contain isolated vertices. An edge coloring $c$ of $G$ is called conflict-free if each edge's closed neighborhood includes a uniquely colored element. The least number of colors admitting such $c$ is called the conflict-free chromatic index of $G$ and denoted $χ'_{\rm CF}(G)$. It is known that in general $χ'_{\rm CF}(G)\leq 3 \lceil \log_2Δ\rceil+1$, while there is a family of graphs, e.g. the complete graphs, for which $χ'_{\rm CF}(G)\geq (1-o(1))\log_2Δ$. In the present paper we provide the asymptotically tight upper bound $χ'_{\rm CF}(G)\leq (1+o(1))\log_2Δ$ for regular and nearly regular graphs, which in particular implies that the same bound holds a.a.s. for a random graph $G=G(n,p)$ whenever $p\gg n^{-\varepsilon}$ for any fixed constant $\varepsilon\in (0,1)$. Our proof is probabilistic and exploits classic results of Hall and Berge. This was inspired by our approach utilized in the particular case of complete graphs, for which we give a more specific upper bound. We also observe that almost the same bounds hold in the open neighborhood regime.

We show that every cubic graph on $n$ vertices contains a spanning subgraph in which the number of vertices of each degree deviates from $\frac{n}{4}$ by at most $\frac{1}{2}$, up to three exceptions. This resolves the conjecture of Alon and Wei (Irregular subgraphs, Combin. Probab. Comput. 32(2) (2023), 269--283) for cubic graphs.

A \emph{tangram} is a word in which every letter occurs an even number of times. Such word can be cut into parts that can be arranged into two identical words. The minimum number of cuts needed is called the \emph{cut number} of a tangram. For example, the word $\mathtt{\color{red}{0102}\color{blue}{0102}}$ is a tangram with cut number one, while the word $\mathtt{\color{red}{01}\color{blue}{01023}\color{red}{023}}$ is a tangram with cut number two. Clearly, tangrams with cut number one coincide with the well known family of words, known as \emph{squares}, having the form $UU$ for some nonempty word $U$. A word $W$ \emph{avoids} a word $T$ if it is not possible to write $W=ATB$, for any words $A$ and $B$ (possibly empty). The famous 1906 theorem of Thue asserts that there exist arbitrarily long words avoiding squares over alphabet with just \emph{three} letters. Given a fixed number $k\geqslant 1$, how many letters are needed to avoid tangrams with the cut number at most $k$? Let $t(k)$ denote the minimum size of an alphabet needed for that purpose. By Thue's result we have $t(1)=3$, which easily implies $t(2)=3$. Curiously, these are currently the only known exact values of this function. In our main result we prove that $t(k)=Θ(\log_2k)$. The proof uses \emph{entropy compression} argument and \emph{Zimin words}. By using a different method we prove that $t(k)\leqslant k+1$ for all $k\geqslant 4$, which gives more exact estimates for small values of $k$. The proof makes use of \emph{Dejean words} and a curious property of \emph{Gauss words}, which is perhaps of independent interest.

The irregularity strength of a graph $G$, $s(G)$, is the least $k$ such that there exists a $\{1,2,\ldots,k\}$-weighting of the edges of $G$ attributing distinct weighted degrees to all vertices, or equivalently the least $k$ enabling obtaining a multigraph with nonrecurring degrees by blowing each edge $e$ of $G$ to at most $k$ copies of $e$. In 1991 Faudree, Jacobson, Kinch and Lehel asked for the optimal lower bound for the minimum degree of a graph $G$ of order $n$ which implies that $s(G)\leq 3$. More generally, they also posed a similar question regarding the upper bound $s(G)\leq K$ for any given constant $K$. We provide asymptotically tight solutions of these problems by proving that such optimal lower bound is of order $\frac{1}{K-1}n$ for every fixed integer $K\geq 3$.

A locally irregular graph is a graph whose adjacent vertices have distinct degrees. It was conjectured that every connected graph is edge decomposable to $3$ locally irregular subgraphs, unless it belongs to a certain family of exceptions, including graphs of small maximum degrees, which are not decomposable to any number of such subgraphs. Recently Sedlar and Škrekovski exhibited a counterexample to the conjecture, which necessitates a decomposition to (at least) $4$ locally irregular subgraphs. We prove that every $d$-regular graph with $d$ large enough, i.e. $d\geq 54000$, is decomposable to $4$ locally irregular subgraphs. Our proof relies on a mixture of a numerically optimized application of the probabilistic method and certain deterministic results on degree constrained subgraphs due to Addario-Berry, Dalal, McDiarmid, Reed, and Thomason, and to Alon and Wei, introduced in the context of related problems concerning irregular subgraphs.

A $\frac{1}{k}$-majority $l$-edge-colouring of a graph $G$ is a colouring of its edges with $l$ colours such that for every colour $i$ and each vertex $v$ of $G$, at most $\frac{1}{k}$'th of the edges incident with $v$ have colour $i$. We conjecture that for every integer $k\geq 2$, each graph with minimum degree $δ\geq k^2$ is $\frac{1}{k}$-majority $(k+1)$-edge-colourable and observe that such result would be best possible. This was already known to hold for $k=2$. We support the conjecture by proving it with $2k^2$ instead of $k^2$, which confirms the right order of magnitude of the conjectured optimal lower bound for $δ$. We at the same time improve the previously known bound of order $k^3\log k$, based on a straightforward probabilistic approach. As this technique seems not applicable towards any further improvement, we use a more direct non-random approach. We also strengthen our result, in particular substituting $2k^2$ by $(\frac{7}{4}+o(1))k^2$. Finally, we provide the proof of the conjecture itself for $k\leq 4$ and completely solve an analogous problem for the family of bipartite graphs.

A proper vertex colouring of a graph $G$ is referred to as conflict-free if in the neighbourhood of every vertex some colour appears exactly once, while it is called $h$-conflict-free if there are at least $h$ such colours for each vertex of $G$. The least numbers of colours in such colourings of $G$ are denoted $χ_{\rm pcf}(G)$ and $χ_{\rm pcf}^h(G)$, respectively. It is known that $χ_{\rm pcf}^h(G)$ can be as large as $(h+1)(Δ+1)\approx Δ^2$ for graphs with maximum degree $Δ$ and $h$ very close to $Δ$. We provide several new upper bounds for these parameters for graphs with minimum degrees $δ$ large enough and $h$ detached from $δ$. In particular we show that $χ_{\rm pcf}^h(G)\leq (1+o(1))Δ$ if $δ\gg\lnΔ$ and $h\ll δ$, and that $χ_{\rm pcf}(G)\leq Δ+O(\ln Δ)$ for regular graphs. These specifically refer to the conjecture of Caro, Petruševski and Škrekovski that $χ_{\rm pcf}(G)\leq Δ+1$ for every connected graph $G$ of maximum degree $Δ\geq 3$, towards which they proved that $χ_{\rm pcf}(G)\leq \left\lfloor\frac{5Δ}{2}\right\rfloor$ if $Δ\geq 1$.

A majority coloring of a directed graph is a vertex coloring in which each vertex has the same color as at most half of its out-neighbors. In this note we simplify some proof techniques and generalize previously known results on various generalizations of majority coloring. In particular, our unified and simplified approach works for paintability - an on-line analog of the list coloring.

We show that Bernshteyn's proof of the breakthrough result of Molloy that triangle-free graphs are choosable from lists of size $(1+o(1))Δ/\logΔ$ can be adapted to yield a stronger result. In particular one may prove that such list sizes are sufficient to colour any graph of maximum degree $Δ$ provided that vertices sharing a common colour in their lists do not induce a triangle in $G$, which encompasses all cases covered by Molloy's theorem. This was thus far known to be true for lists of size $(1000+o(1))Δ/\logΔ$, as implies a more general result due to Amini and Reed. We also prove that lists of length $2(r-2)Δ\log_2\log_2Δ/\log_2Δ$ are sufficient if one replaces the triangle by any $K_r$ with $r\geq 4$, pushing also slightly the multiplicative factor of $200r$ from Bernshteyn's result down to $2(r-2)$. All bounds presented are also valid within the more general setting of correspondence colourings.

Let $G$ be a graph with maximum degree $Δ$ and without isolated vertices. An edge colouring $c$ of $G$ is conflict-free if the closed neighbourhood of every edge includes a uniquely coloured element. The least number of colours admitting such $c$ is the conflict-free chromatic index of $G$, denoted by $χ'_{CF}(G)$. In "Conflict-free chromatic number versus conflict-free chromatic index" [J. Graph Theory, 2022; 99: 349--358] it was recently proved by means of the probabilistic method that $χ'_{CF}(G)\leq C_1\log_2Δ+C_2$, where $C_1>337$ and $C_2$ are constants, whereas there are families of graphs with $χ'_{CF}(G)\geq (1-o(1))\log_2Δ$. In this note we provide an explicit simple proof of the fact that $χ'_{CF}(G)\leq 3\log_2Δ+1$, which is a corollary of a stronger result: $χ'_{CF}(G)\leq 3\log_2χ(G)+1$. For this aim we prove a few auxiliary observations, implying in particular that $χ'_{CF}(G)\leq 4$ for bipartite graphs.

Let $N$ be a positive integer. A sequence $X=(x_1,x_2,\ldots,x_N)$ of points in the unit interval $[0,1)$ is piercing if $\{x_1,x_2,\ldots,x_n\}\cap \left[\frac{i}{n},\frac{i+1}{n} \right) \neq\emptyset$ holds for every $n=1,2,\ldots, N$ and every $i=0,1,\ldots,n-1$. In 1958 Steinhaus asked whether piercing sequences can be arbitrarily long. A negative answer was provided by Schinzel, who proved that any such sequence may have at most $74$ elements. This was later improved to the best possible value of $17$ by Warmus, and independently by Berlekamp and Graham. In this paper we study a more general variant of piercing sequences. Let $f(n)\geq n$ be an infinite nondecreasing sequence of positive integers. A sequence $X=(x_1,x_2,\ldots,x_{f(N)})$ is $f$-piercing if $\{x_1,x_2,\ldots,x_{f(n)}\}\cap \left[\frac{i}{n},\frac{i+1}{n} \right) \neq\emptyset$ holds for every $n=1,2,\ldots, N$ and every $i=0,1,\ldots,n-1$. A special case of $f(n)=n+d$, with $d$ a fixed nonnegative integer, was studied by Berlekamp and Graham. They noticed that for each $d\geq 0$, the maximum length of any $(n+d)$-piercing sequence is finite. Expressing this maximum length as $s(d)+d$, they obtained an exponential upper bound on the function $s(d)$, which was later improved to $s(d)=O(d^3)$ by Graham and Levy. Recently, Konyagin proved that $2d\leqslant s(d)< 200d$ holds for all sufficiently big $d$. Using a different technique based on the Farey fractions and stick-breaking games, we prove here that the function $s(d)$ satisfies $\left\lfloor{}c_1d\right\rfloor{}\leqslant s(d)\leqslant c_2d+o(d)$, where $c_1=\frac{\ln 2}{1-\ln 2}\approx2.25$ and $c_2=\frac{1+\ln2}{1-\ln2}\approx5.52$. We also prove that there exists an infinite $f$-piercing sequence with $f(n)= γn+o(n)$ if and only if $γ\geq\frac{1}{\ln 2}\approx 1.44$.