arXiv++ Combinatorics

Arboricity and degeneracy are two fundamental and closely related graph parameters that measure the sparsity of a graph. Every $k$-degenerate graph is $k$-arboric, but some $k$-arboric graphs are only $(2k-1)$-degenerate. However, every maximal $k$-arboric multigraph with $n$ vertices and every maximal $k$-degenerate multigraph with $n$ vertices has exactly $k(n-1)$ edges. These basic observations lead to a natural structural question: How far are $k$-arboric graphs from being $k$-degenerate? We answer this question by showing that: By at most a $(k-1)$-bounded-degree graph apart. More specifically, we prove that a $k$-arboric multigraph admits a $(k,k-1)$-decomposition, that is, its edges can be partitioned into two multisets such that one spans a $k$-degenerate multigraph and the other spans a multigraph with every vertex having degree at most $k-1$. Moreover, we provide a complete characterisation of all possible such decomposition types. Namely, for any integers $k \ge 1$ and $d,h \ge 0$ we show that every $k$-arboric multigraph admits a $(d,h)$-decomposition if and only if $d\geq k$ and $d+h\geq 2k-1$. Our proofs are constructive and we present a polynomial time algorithm that produces such decompositions. By contrast, we show that related decision problems for general graphs (without constraints on the arboricity) are NP-complete.

Let $Γ$ be a straight-line crossing-free drawing of a tree $T$. A \emph{bad pair} in $Γ$ is a pair of non-adjacent vertices of $T$ whose Euclidean distance in $Γ$ is smaller than the length of the longest edge in the path connecting them in~$Γ$. When $Γ$ has no bad pairs, $Γ$ is a Euclidean Minimum Spanning Tree of its vertex set (or EMST-drawing for short). Deciding whether a tree of maximum degree at most six admits an EMST-drawing is known to be \NP-hard. In contrast, we characterize those caterpillars that admit an EMST-drawing. The characterization gives rise to a linear-time algorithm that decides if a caterpillar admits an EMST-drawing, and in the affirmative case, computes such a drawing. For caterpillars of maximum degree six, we further present a linear-time algorithm to compute a crossing-free straight-line drawing with the minimum number of bad pairs. For $n$-vertex trees with maximum vertex degree $Δ$, we prove the $Δ^2n\log n$ upper bound on the minimum number of bad pairs. In the special case of stars, we construct a drawing with the minimum number of bad pairs.

For a directed graph $G$, and a linear order $\ll$ on the vertices of $G$, we define backedge graph $G^\ll$ to be the undirected graph on the same vertex set with edge $\{u,w\}$ in $G^\ll$ if and only if $(u,w)$ is an arc in $G$ and $w \ll u$. The directed clique number of a directed graph $G$ is defined as the minimum size of the maximum clique in the backedge graph $G^\ll$ taken over all linear orders $\ll$ on the vertices of $G$. A natural computational problem is to decide for a given directed graph $G$ and a positive integer $t$, if the directed clique number of $G$ is at most $t$. This problem has polynomial algorithm for $t=1$ and is known to be \NP-complete for every fixed $t\ge3$, even for tournaments. In this note we prove that this problem is $Σ^\mathsf{P}_{2}$-complete when $t$ is given on the input.

Hons, Klimošová, Kucheriya, Mikšaník, Tkadlec, and Tyomkyn proved that, for every integer $\ell \ge 1$, every directed graph with minimum out-degree at least $3.23 \cdot \ell$ contains a $(2,\ell)$-spider (a $1$-subdivision of the in-star with $\ell$ leaves) as a subgraph. They also conjectured that the bound on the minimum out-degree can be further improved to $2 \ell$. In this note, we confirm their conjecture by showing that every directed graph with minimum out-degree at least $2\ell$ contains a $(2, \ell)$-spider as a subgraph. This result is best possible, as the complete directed graph with $2\ell$ vertices does not contain a $(2,\ell)$-spider.

Given a hypergraph $H=(V,E)$, define for every edge $e\in E$ a linear expression with arguments corresponding with the vertices. Next, let the polynomial $p_H$ be the product of such linear expressions for all edges. Our main goal was to find a relationship between the Alon-Tarsi number of $p_H$ and the edge density of $H$. We prove that $AT(p_H)=\lceil ed(H)\rceil+1$ if all the coefficients in $p_H$ are equal to $1$. Our main result is that, no matter what those coefficients are, they can be permuted within the edges so that for the resulting polynomial $p_H^\prime$, $AT(p_H^\prime)\leq 2\lceil ed(H)\rceil+1$ holds. We conjecture that, in fact, permuting the coefficients is not necessary. If this were true, then in particular a significant generalization of the famous 1-2-3 Conjecture would follow.

A majority coloring of a directed graph is a vertex coloring in which each vertex has the same color as at most half of its out-neighbors. In this note we simplify some proof techniques and generalize previously known results on various generalizations of majority coloring. In particular, our unified and simplified approach works for paintability - an on-line analog of the list coloring.

Let $N$ be a positive integer. A sequence $X=(x_1,x_2,\ldots,x_N)$ of points in the unit interval $[0,1)$ is piercing if $\{x_1,x_2,\ldots,x_n\}\cap \left[\frac{i}{n},\frac{i+1}{n} \right) \neq\emptyset$ holds for every $n=1,2,\ldots, N$ and every $i=0,1,\ldots,n-1$. In 1958 Steinhaus asked whether piercing sequences can be arbitrarily long. A negative answer was provided by Schinzel, who proved that any such sequence may have at most $74$ elements. This was later improved to the best possible value of $17$ by Warmus, and independently by Berlekamp and Graham. In this paper we study a more general variant of piercing sequences. Let $f(n)\geq n$ be an infinite nondecreasing sequence of positive integers. A sequence $X=(x_1,x_2,\ldots,x_{f(N)})$ is $f$-piercing if $\{x_1,x_2,\ldots,x_{f(n)}\}\cap \left[\frac{i}{n},\frac{i+1}{n} \right) \neq\emptyset$ holds for every $n=1,2,\ldots, N$ and every $i=0,1,\ldots,n-1$. A special case of $f(n)=n+d$, with $d$ a fixed nonnegative integer, was studied by Berlekamp and Graham. They noticed that for each $d\geq 0$, the maximum length of any $(n+d)$-piercing sequence is finite. Expressing this maximum length as $s(d)+d$, they obtained an exponential upper bound on the function $s(d)$, which was later improved to $s(d)=O(d^3)$ by Graham and Levy. Recently, Konyagin proved that $2d\leqslant s(d)< 200d$ holds for all sufficiently big $d$. Using a different technique based on the Farey fractions and stick-breaking games, we prove here that the function $s(d)$ satisfies $\left\lfloor{}c_1d\right\rfloor{}\leqslant s(d)\leqslant c_2d+o(d)$, where $c_1=\frac{\ln 2}{1-\ln 2}\approx2.25$ and $c_2=\frac{1+\ln2}{1-\ln2}\approx5.52$. We also prove that there exists an infinite $f$-piercing sequence with $f(n)= γn+o(n)$ if and only if $γ\geq\frac{1}{\ln 2}\approx 1.44$.

Let $Γ$ be an Abelian group and let $G$ be a simple graph. We say that $G$ is $Γ$-colorable if for some fixed orientation of $G$ and every edge labeling $\ell:E(G)\rightarrow Γ$, there exists a vertex coloring $c$ by the elements of $Γ$ such that $c(y)-c(x)\neq \ell(e)$, for every edge $e=xy$ (oriented from $x$ to $y$). Langhede and Thomassen proved recently that every planar graph on $n$ vertices has at least $2^{n/9}$ different $\mathbb{Z}_5$-colorings. By using a different approach based on graph polynomials, we extend this result to $K_5$-minor-free graphs in the more general setting of field coloring. More specifically, we prove that every such graph on $n$ vertices is $\mathbb{F}$-$5$-choosable, whenever $\mathbb{F}$ is an arbitrary field with at least $5$ elements. Moreover, the number of colorings (for every list assignment) is at least $5^{n/4}$.

For a hypergraph $H$, let $q(H)$ denote the expected number of monochromatic edges when the color of each vertex in $H$ is sampled uniformly at random from the set of size 2. Let $s_{\min}(H)$ denote the minimum size of an edge in $H$. Erdős asked in 1963 whether there exists an unbounded function $g(k)$ such that any hypergraph $H$ with $s_{\min}(H) \geq k$ and $q(H) \leq g(k)$ is two colorable. Beck in 1978 answered this question in the affirmative for a function $g(k) = Θ(\log^* k)$. We improve this result by showing that, for an absolute constant $δ>0$, a version of random greedy coloring procedure is likely to find a proper two coloring for any hypergraph $H$ with $s_{\min}(H) \geq k$ and $q(H) \leq δ\cdot \log k$.

We study the online graph coloring problem restricted to the intersection graphs of intervals with lengths in $[1,σ]$. For $σ=1$ it is the class of unit interval graphs, and for $σ=\infty$ the class of all interval graphs. Our focus is on intermediary classes. We present a $(1+σ)$-competitive algorithm, which beats the state of the art for $1 < σ< 2$, and proves that the problem we study can be strictly easier than online coloring of general interval graphs. On the lower bound side, we prove that no algorithm is better than $5/3$-competitive for any $σ>1$, nor better than $7/4$-competitive for any $σ>2$, and that no algorithm beats the $5/2$ asymptotic competitive ratio for all, arbitrarily large, values of $σ$. That last result shows that the problem we study can be strictly harder than unit interval coloring. Our main technical contribution is a recursive composition of strategies, which seems essential to prove any lower bound higher than $2$.

The \emph{slow-coloring game} is played by Lister and Painter on a graph $G$. Initially, all vertices of $G$ are uncolored. In each round, Lister marks a nonempty set $M$ of uncolored vertices, and Painter colors a subset of $M$ that is independent in $G$. The game ends when all vertices are colored. The score of the game is the sum of the sizes of all sets marked by Lister. The goal of Painter is to minimize the score, while Lister tries to maximize it. We provide strategies for Painter on various classes of graphs whose vertices can be partitioned into a bounded number of sets inducing forests, including $k$-degenerate, acyclically $k$-colorable, planar, and outerplanar graphs. For example, we show that on an $n$-vertex graph $G$, Painter can keep the score to at most $\frac{3k+4}4n$ when $G$ is $k$-degenerate, $3.9857n$ when $G$ is acyclically $5$-colorable, $3n$ when $G$ is planar with a Hamiltonian dual, $\frac{8n+3m}5$ when $G$ is $4$-colorable with $m$ edges (hence $3.4n$ when $G$ is planar), and $\frac73n$ when $G$ is outerplanar.

A sequence $\left(x_1,x_2,\ldots,x_{2n}\right)$ of even length is a repetition if $\left(x_1,\ldots,x_n\right) = \left(x_{n+1},\ldots,x_{2n}\right)$. We prove existence of a constant $C < 10^{4 \cdot 10^7}$ such that given any planar drawing of a graph $G$, and a list $L(v)$ of $C$ permissible colors for each vertex $v$ in $G$, there is a choice of a permissible color for each vertex such that the sequence of colors of the vertices on any facial simple path in $G$ is not a repetition.

A $d$-defective $k$-painting game on a graph $G$ is played by two players: Lister and Painter. Initially, each vertex is uncolored and has $k$ tokens. In each round, Lister marks a chosen set $M$ of uncolored vertices and removes one token from each marked vertex. In response, Painter colors vertices in a subset $X$ of $M$ which induce a subgraph $G[X]$ of maximum degree at most $d$. Lister wins the game if at the end of some round there is an uncolored vertex that has no more tokens left. Otherwise, all vertices eventually get colored and Painter wins the game. We say that $G$ is $d$-defective $k$-paintable if Painter has a winning strategy in this game. In this paper we show that every planar graph is 3-defective 3-paintable and give a construction of a planar graph that is not 2-defective 3-paintable.

We propose two strategies for Presenter in the on-line interval graph coloring games. Specifically, we consider a setting in which each interval is associated with a $d$-dimensional vector of weights and the coloring needs to satisfy the $d$-dimensional bandwidth constraint, and the $k$-cardinality constraint. Such a variant was first introduced by Epstein and Levy and it is a natural model for resource-aware task scheduling with $d$ different shared resources where at most $k$ tasks can be scheduled simultaneously on a single machine. The first strategy forces any on-line interval coloring algorithm to use at least $(5m-3)\frac{d}{\log d + 3}$ different colors on an $m(\frac{d}{k} + \log{d} + 3)$-colorable set of intervals. The second strategy forces any on-line interval coloring algorithm to use at least $\lfloor\frac{5m}{2}\rfloor\frac{d}{\log d + 3}$ different colors on an $m(\frac{d}{k} + \log{d} + 3)$-colorable set of unit intervals.

A $k$-edge-colored graph is a finite, simple graph with edges labeled by numbers $1,\ldots,k$. A function from the vertex set of one $k$-edge-colored graph to another is a homomorphism if the endpoints of any edge are mapped to two different vertices connected by an edge of the same color. Given a class $\mathcal{F}$ of graphs, a $k$-edge-colored graph $\mathbb{H}$ (not necessarily with the underlying graph in $\mathcal{F}$) is $k$-universal for $\mathcal{F}$ when any $k$-edge-colored graph with the underlying graph in $\mathcal{F}$ admits a homomorphism to $\mathbb{H}$. We characterize graph classes that admit $k$-universal graphs. For such classes, we establish asymptotically almost tight bounds on the size of the smallest universal graph. For a nonempty graph $G$, the density of $G$ is the maximum ratio of the number of edges to the number of vertices ranging over all nonempty subgraphs of $G$. For a nonempty class $\mathcal{F}$ of graphs, $D(\mathcal{F})$ denotes the density of $\mathcal{F}$, that is the supremum of densities of graphs in $\mathcal{F}$. The main results are the following. The class $\mathcal{F}$ admits $k$-universal graphs for $k\geq2$ if and only if there is an absolute constant that bounds the acyclic chromatic number of any graph in $\mathcal{F}$. For any such class, there exists a constant $c$, such that for any $k \geq 2$, the size of the smallest $k$-universal graph is between $k^{D(\mathcal{F})}$ and $ck^{\lceil D(\mathcal{F})\rceil}$. A connection between the acyclic coloring and the existence of universal graphs was first observed by Alon and Marshall (Journal of Algebraic Combinatorics, 8(1):5-13, 1998). One of their results is that for planar graphs, the size of the smallest $k$-universal graph is between $k^3+3$ and $5k^4$. Our results yield that there exists a constant $c$ such that for all $k$, this size is bounded from above by $ck^3$.

We prove that the difference between the paint number and the choice number of a complete bipartite graph $K_{N,N}$ is $Θ(\log \log N )$. That answers the question of Zhu (2009) whether this difference, for all graphs, can be bounded by a common constant. By a classical correspondence, our result translates to the framework of on-line coloring of uniform hypergraphs. This way we obtain that for every on-line two coloring algorithm there exists a k-uniform hypergraph with $Θ(2^k )$ edges on which the strategy fails. The results are derived through an analysis of a natural family of chip games.

We propose two strategies for Presenter in on-line graph coloring games. The first one constructs bipartite graphs and forces any on-line coloring algorithm to use $2\log_2 n - 10$ colors, where $n$ is the number of vertices in the constructed graph. This is best possible up to an additive constant. The second strategy constructs graphs that contain neither $C_3$ nor $C_5$ as a subgraph and forces $Ω(\frac{n}{\log n}^\frac{1}{3})$ colors. The best known on-line coloring algorithm for these graphs uses $O(n^{\frac{1}{2}})$ colors.