arXiv++ Combinatorics

The $r$-colour Ramsey number $R_r(k)$ is the minimum $n \in \mathbb{N}$ such that every $r$-colouring of the edges of the complete graph $K_n$ on $n$ vertices contains a monochromatic copy of $K_k$. We prove, for each fixed $r \geqslant 2$, that $$R_r(k) \leqslant e^{-δk} r^{rk}$$ for some constant $δ= δ(r) > 0$ and all sufficiently large $k \in \mathbb{N}$. For each $r \geqslant 3$, this is the first exponential improvement over the upper bound of Erdős and Szekeres from 1935. In the case $r = 2$, it gives a different (and significantly shorter) proof of a recent result of Campos, Griffiths, Morris and Sahasrabudhe.

Suppose that $A$ and $B$ are sets in $\mathbb{R}^d$, and we form the sumset of $A$ with $n$ random points of $B$. Given the volumes of $A$ and $B$, how should we choose them to minimize the expected volume of this sumset? Our aim in this paper is to show that we should take $A$ and $B$ to be Euclidean balls. We also consider the analogous question in the torus $\mathbb{T}^d$, and we show that in this case the optimal choices of $A$ and $B$ are bands, in other words, sets of the form $[x,y]\times\mathbb{T}^{d-1}$. We also give stability versions of our results.

A covering system is a finite collection of arithmetic progressions whose union is the set of integers. The study of these objects was initiated by Erdős in 1950, and over the following decades he asked many questions about them. Most famously, he asked whether there exist covering systems with distinct moduli whose minimum modulus is arbitrarily large. This problem was resolved in 2015 by Hough, who showed that in any such system the minimum modulus is at most $10^{16}$. The purpose of this note is to give a gentle exposition of a simpler and stronger variant of Hough's method, which was recently used to answer several other questions about covering systems. We hope that this technique, which we call the distortion method, will have many further applications in other combinatorial settings.

The classical Cauchy--Davenport inequality gives a lower bound for the size of the sum of two subsets of ${\mathbb Z}_p$, where $p$ is a prime. Our main aim in this paper is to prove a considerable strengthening of this inequality, where we take only a small number of points from each of the two subsets when forming the sum. One of our results is that there is an absolute constant $c>0$ such that if $A$ and $B$ are subsets of ${\mathbb Z}_p$ with $|A|=|B|=n\le p/3$ then there are subsets $A'\subset A$ and $B'\subset B$ with $|A'|=|B'|\le c \sqrt{n}$ such that $|A'+B'|\ge 2n-1$. In fact, we show that one may take any sizes one likes: as long as $c_1$ and $c_2$ satisfy $c_1c_2 \ge cn$ then we may choose $|A'|=c_1$ and $|B'|=c_2$. We prove related results for general abelian groups.

In its usual form, Freiman's 3k-4 theorem states that if A and B are subsets of the integers of size k with small sumset (of size close to 2k) then they are very close to arithmetic progressions. Our aim in this paper is to strengthen this by allowing only a bounded number of possible summands from one of the sets. We show that if A and B are subsets of the integers of size k such that for any four-element subset X of B the sumset A+X has size not much more than 2k then already this implies that A and B are very close to arithmetic progressions.

In this paper we start to investigate a new body of questions in additive combinatorics. The fundamental Cauchy--Davenport theorem gives a lower bound on the size of a sumset A+B for subsets of the cyclic group Zp of order p (p prime), and this is just one example of a large family of results. Our aim in this paper is to investigate what happens if we restrict the number of elements of one set that we may use to form the sums. Here is the question we set out to answer: given two subsets, A and B, does B have a subset C of bounded size such that A+C is large, perhaps even comparable to the size of A+B? In particular, can we get close to the lower bound of the Cauchy--Davenport theorem? Our main results show that, rather surprisingly, in many circumstances it is possible to obtain not merely an asymptotic version of the usual sumset bound, but even the exact bound itself.

In this paper we study monotone cellular automata in $d$ dimensions. We develop a general method for bounding the growth of the infected set when the initial configuration is chosen randomly, and then use this method to prove a lower bound on the critical probability for percolation that is sharp up to a constant factor in the exponent for every 'critical' model. This is one of three papers that together confirm the Universality Conjecture of Bollobás, Duminil-Copin, Morris and Smith.

In many interacting particle systems, relaxation to equilibrium is thought to occur via the growth of 'droplets', and it is a question of fundamental importance to determine the critical length at which such droplets appear. In this paper we construct a mechanism for the growth of droplets in an arbitrary finite-range monotone cellular automaton on a $d$-dimensional lattice. Our main application is an upper bound on the critical probability for percolation that is sharp up to a constant factor in the exponent. Our method also provides several crucial tools that we expect to have applications to other interacting particle systems, such as kinetically constrained spin models on $\mathbb{Z}^d$. This is one of three papers that together confirm the Universality Conjecture of Bollobás, Duminil-Copin, Morris and Smith.

We study monotone cellular automata (also known as $\mathcal{U}$-bootstrap percolation) in $\mathbb{Z}^d$ with random initial configurations. Confirming a conjecture of Balister, Bollobás, Przykucki and Smith, who proved the corresponding result in two dimensions, we show that the critical probability is non-zero for all subcritical models.

Amongst $d$-regular $r$-uniform hypergraphs on $n$ vertices, which ones have the largest number of independent sets? While the analogous problem for graphs (originally raised by Granville) is now well-understood, it is not even clear what the correct general conjecture ought to be; our goal here is propose such a generalisation. Lending credence to our conjecture, we verify it within the class of `quasi-bipartite' hypergraphs (a generalisation of bipartite graphs that seems natural in this context) by adopting the entropic approach of Kahn.

We show that there exist absolute constants $Δ> δ> 0$ such that, for all $n \geqslant 2$, there exists a polynomial $P$ of degree $n$, with $\pm 1$ coefficients, such that $$δ\sqrt{n} \leqslant |P(z)| \leqslant Δ\sqrt{n}$$ for all $z\in\mathbb{C}$ with $|z|=1$. This confirms a conjecture of Littlewood from 1966.

Introduced by Erdős in 1950, a covering system of the integers is a finite collection of arithmetic progressions whose union is the set $\mathbb{Z}$. Many beautiful questions and conjectures about covering systems have been posed over the past several decades, but until recently little was known about their properties. Most famously, the so-called minimum modulus problem of Erdős was resolved in 2015 by Hough, who proved that in every covering system with distinct moduli, the minimum modulus is at most $10^{16}$. In this paper we answer another question of Erdős, asked in 1952, on the number of minimal covering systems. More precisely, we show that the number of minimal covering systems with exactly $n$ elements is \[ \exp\left( \left(\frac{4\sqrtτ}{3} + o(1)\right) \frac{n^{3/2}}{(\log n)^{1/2}} \right) \] as $n \to \infty$, where \[ τ= \sum_{t = 1}^\infty \left( \log \frac{t+1}{t} \right)^2. \] En route to this counting result, we obtain a structural description of all covering systems that are close to optimal in an appropriate sense.

A covering system is a finite collection of arithmetic progressions whose union is the set of integers. The study of covering systems with distinct moduli was initiated by Erdős in 1950, and over the following decades numerous problems were posed regarding their properties. One particularly notorious question, due to Erdős, asks whether there exist covering systems whose moduli are distinct and all odd. We show that if in addition one assumes the moduli are square-free, then there must be an even modulus.

Since their introduction by Erdős in 1950, covering systems (that is, finite collections of arithmetic progressions that cover the integers) have been extensively studied, and numerous questions and conjectures have been posed regarding the existence of covering systems with various properties. In particular, Erdős asked if the moduli can be distinct and all arbitrarily large, Erdős and Selfridge asked if the moduli can be distinct and all odd, and Schinzel conjectured that in any covering system there exists a pair of moduli, one of which divides the other. Another beautiful conjecture, proposed by Erdős and Graham in 1980, states that if the moduli are distinct elements of the interval $[n,Cn]$, and $n$ is sufficiently large, then the density of integers uncovered by the union is bounded below by a constant (depending only on $C$). This conjecture was confirmed (in a strong form) by Filaseta, Ford, Konyagin, Pomerance and Yu in 2007, who moreover asked whether the same conclusion holds if the moduli are distinct and sufficiently large, and $\sum_{i=1}^k \frac{1}{d_i} < C$. Although this condition turns out not to be sufficiently strong to imply the desired conclusion, as the main result of this paper we will give an essentially best possible condition which is sufficient. Our method has a number of further applications. Most importantly, we prove the conjecture of Schinzel stated above, which was made in 1967. We moreover give an alternative (somewhat simpler) proof of a breakthrough result of Hough, who resolved Erdős' minimum modulus problem, with an improved bound on the smallest difference. Finally, we make further progress on the problem of Erdős and Selfridge.

For a constant $γ\in[0,1]$ and a graph $G$, let $ω_γ(G)$ be the largest integer $k$ for which there exists a $k$-vertex subgraph of $G$ with at least $γ\binom{k}{2}$ edges. We show that if $0<p<γ<1$ then $ω_γ(G_{n,p})$ is concentrated on a set of two integers. More precisely, with $α(γ,p)=γ\log\fracγ{p}+(1-γ)\log\frac{1-γ}{1-p}$, we show that $ω_γ(G_{n,p})$ is one of the two integers closest to $\frac{2}{α(γ,p)}\big(\log n-\log\log n+\log\frac{eα(γ,p)}{2}\big)+\frac{1}{2}$, with high probability. While this situation parallels that of cliques in random graphs, a new technique is required to handle the more complicated ways in which these "quasi-cliques" may overlap.

We present a short, self-contained, and purely combinatorial proof of Linnik's theorem: for any $\varepsilon > 0$ there exists a constant $C_\varepsilon$ such that for any $N$, there are at most $C_\varepsilon$ primes $p \leqslant N$ such that the least positive quadratic non-residue modulo $p$ exceeds $N^\varepsilon$.

A colouring of the edges of an $n \times n$ grid is said to be \emph{reconstructible} if the colouring is uniquely determined by the multiset of its $n^2$ \emph{tiles}, where the tile corresponding to a vertex of the grid specifies the colours of the edges incident to that vertex in some fixed order. In 2015, Mossel and Ross asked the following question: if the edges of an $n \times n$ grid are coloured independently and uniformly at random using $q=q(n)$ different colours, then is the resulting colouring reconstructible with high probability? From below, Mossel and Ross showed that such a colouring is not reconstructible when $q = o(n^{2/3})$ and from above, Bordenave, Feige and Mossel and Nenadov, Pfister and Steger independently showed, for any fixed $ε> 0$, that such a colouring is reconstructible when $q \ge n^{1+ε}$. Here, we improve on these results and prove the following: there exist absolute constants $C, c > 0$ such that, as $n \to \infty$, the probability that a random colouring as above is reconstructible tends to $1$ if $q \ge Cn$ and to $0$ if $q \le cn$.

For natural numbers $n,r \in \mathbb{N}$ with $n\ge r$, the Kneser graph $K(n,r)$ is the graph on the family of $r$-element subsets of $\{1,\dots,n\}$ in which two sets are adjacent if and only if they are disjoint. Delete the edges of $K(n,r)$ with some probability, independently of each other: is the independence number of this random graph equal to the independence number of the Kneser graph itself? We answer this question affirmatively as long as $r/n$ is bounded away from $1/2$, even when the probability of retaining an edge of the Kneser graph is quite small. This gives us a random analogue of the Erdős-Ko-Rado theorem since an independent set in the Kneser graph is the same as a uniform intersecting family. To prove our main result, we give some new estimates for the number of disjoint pairs in a family in terms of its distance from an intersecting family, these might be of independent interest.

We study the problem of cops and robbers on the grid where the robber is allowed to move faster than the cops. It is well known that two cops are necessary and sufficient to catch the robber on any finite grid when the robber has unit speed. Here, we prove that when the speed of the robber is a sufficiently large constant, the number of cops needed to catch the robber on an $n \times n$ grid is $\exp(Ω(\log n / \log \log n))$.

Consider a random sequence of $N$ integers, each chosen uniformly and independently from the set $\{1,\dots,x\}$. Motivated by applications to factorisation algorithms such as Dixon's algorithm, the quadratic sieve, and the number field sieve, Pomerance in 1994 posed the following problem: how large should $N$ be so that, with high probability, this sequence contains a subsequence, the product of whose elements is a perfect square? Pomerance determined asymptotically the logarithm of the threshold for this event, and conjectured that it in fact exhibits a sharp threshold in $N$. More recently, Croot, Granville, Pemantle and Tetali determined the threshold up to a factor of $4/π+ o(1)$ as $x \to \infty$, and made a conjecture regarding the location of the sharp threshold. In this paper we prove both of these conjectures, by determining the sharp threshold for making squares. Our proof combines techniques from combinatorics, probability and analytic number theory; in particular, we use the so-called method of self-correcting martingales in order to control the size of the 2-core of the random hypergraph that encodes the prime factors of our random numbers. Our method also gives a new (and completely different) proof of the upper bound in the main theorem of Croot, Granville, Pemantle and Tetali.