arXiv++ Combinatorics

We study the computational complexity of several counting problems on graphs. Each of these problems consists of counting orderings of the vertices or edges with adjacency constraints. We show $\#P$-completeness for all of them via a common new technique. Given a counting function $C$ of interest, we define a parameterized family of instances $G_q$, where the parameter $q$ controls the amplification of a simple gadget. After multiplying by an explicit factor $f(q)$, we show that the values of $f(q) \cdot C(G_q)$, for positive integers $q$, agree with a rational function in $q$ whose numerator and denominator can be interpolated in polynomial time. We then recover a $\#P$-hard function by evaluating this rational function symbolically at a limiting value $L \in \mathbb{Q} \cup \{\infty, -\infty\}$. With this methodology, we show $\#P$-completeness for the following counting problems: (a) successive vertex orderings of bipartite graphs, (b) st-numberings of graphs, (c) shellings of bipartite graphs, (d) linear extensions of N-free posets of height $3$, and (e) linear extensions of posets of height $2$. Result (d) settles a conjecture of Felsner and Manneville (2015). Although result (e) was first proved by Dittmer and Pak (2018), we include an alternative proof, using our technique, that does not rely on the result of Brightwell and Winkler (1991) about the hardness of counting linear extensions for general posets.

Ramsey-good graphs are graphs that contain neither a clique of size $s$ nor an independent set of size $t$. We study doubly saturated Ramsey-good graphs, defined as Ramsey-good graphs in which the addition or removal of any edge necessarily creates an $s$-clique or a $t$-independent set. We present a method combining SAT solving with bespoke LLM-generated code to discover infinite families of such graphs, answering a question of Grinstead and Roberts from 1982. In addition, we use LLMs to generate and formalize correctness proofs in Lean. This case study highlights the potential of integrating automated reasoning, large language models, and formal verification to accelerate mathematical discovery. We argue that such tool-driven workflows will play an increasingly central role in experimental mathematics.

In the permutation Mastermind game, the goal is to uncover a secret permutation $σ^\star \colon [n] \to [n]$ by making a series of guesses $π_1, \ldots, π_T$ which must also be permutations of $[n]$, and receiving as feedback after guess $π_t$ the number of positions $i$ for which $σ^\star(i) = π_t(i)$. While the existing literature on permutation Mastermind suggests strategies in which $π_t$ and $π_{t+1}$ might be widely different permutations, a resurgence in popularity of this game as a TikTok trend shows that humans (or at least TikTok influencers) use strategies in which consecutive guesses are very similar. For example, it is common to see players attempt one transposition at a time and slowly see their score increase. Motivated by these observations, we study the theoretical impact of two forms of "locality" in permutation Mastermind strategies: $\ell_k$-local strategies, in which any two consecutive guesses differ in at most $k$ positions, and the even more restrictive class of $w_k$-local strategies, in which consecutive guesses differ in a window of length at most $k$. We show that, in broad terms, the optimal number of guesses for local strategies is quadratic, and thus much worse than the $O(n \lg n)$ guesses that suffice for non-local strategies. We also show NP-hardness of the satisfiability version for $\ell_3$-local strategies, whereas in the $\ell_2$-local variant the problem admits a randomized polynomial algorithm.

We study the problem of partitioning the edges of a $d$-uniform hypergraph $H$ into a family $F$ of complete $d$-partite hypergraphs ($d$-cliques). We show that there is a partition $F$ in which every vertex $v \in V(H)$ belongs to at most $(\frac{1}{d!} + o_d(1))n^{d-1}/\lg n$ members of $F$. This settles the central question of a line of research initiated by Erdős and Pyber (1997) for graphs, and more recently by Csirmaz, Ligeti, and Tardos (2014) for hypergraphs. The $d=2$ case of this theorem answers a 40-year-old question of Chung, Erdős, and Spencer (1983). An immediate corollary of our result is an improved upper bound for the maximum share size for binary secret sharing schemes on uniform hypergraphs. Building on results of Nechiporuk (1969), we prove that every graph with fixed edge density $γ\in (0,1)$ has a biclique partition of total weight at most $(\tfrac{1}{2}+o(1))\cdot h_2(γ) \frac{n^2}{\lg n}$, where $h_2$ is the binary entropy function. Our construction implies that such biclique partitions can be constructed in time $O(m)$, which answers a question of Feder and Motwani (1995) and also improves upon results of Mubayi and Turán (2010) as well as Chavan, Rabinia, Grosu, and Brocanelli (2025). Using similar techniques, we also give an $n^{1+o(1)}$ algorithm for finding a subgraph $K_{t,t}$ with $t = (1-o(1)) \fracγ{h_2(γ)} \lg n$. Our results show that biclique partitions are information-theoretically optimal representations for graphs at every fixed density. We show that with this succinct representation one can answer independent set queries and cut queries in time $O(n^2/ \lg n)$, and if we increase the space usage by a constant factor, we can compute a $2α$-approximation for the densest subgraph problem in time $O(n^2/\lg α)$ for any $α> 1$.

Norin (2008) conjectured that any $2$-edge-coloring of the hypercube $Q_n$ in which antipodal edges receive different colors must contain a monochromatic path between some pair of antipodal vertices. While the general conjecture remains elusive, progress thus far has been made on two fronts: finite cases and asymptotic relaxations. The best finite results are due to Frankston and Scheinerman (2024) who verified the conjecture for $n \leq 7$ using SAT solvers, and the best asymptotic result is due to Dvořák (2020), who showed that every $2$-edge-coloring of $Q_n$ admits an antipodal path of length $n$ with at most $0.375n + o(n)$ color changes. We improve on both fronts via SAT. First, we extend the verification to $n = 8$ by introducing a more compact and efficient SAT encoding, enhanced with symmetry breaking and cube-and-conquer parallelism. The versatility of this new encoding allows us to recast parts of Dvořák's asymptotic approach as a SAT problem, thereby improving the asymptotic upper bound to $0.3125n + O(1)$ color changes. Our work demonstrates how SAT-based methods can yield not only finite-case confirmations but also asymptotic progress on combinatorial conjectures.

It is well-known by now that any state of the $3\times 3 \times 3$ Rubik's Cube can be solved in at most 20 moves, a result often referred to as "God's Number". However, this result took Rokicki et al. around 35 CPU years to prove and is therefore very challenging to reproduce. We provide a novel approach to obtain a worse bound of 36 moves with high confidence, but that offers two main advantages: (i) it is easy to understand, reproduce, and verify, and (ii) our main idea generalizes to bounding the diameter of other vertex-transitive graphs by at most twice its true value, hence the name "demigod number". Our approach is based on the fact that, for vertex-transitive graphs, the average distance between vertices is at most half the diameter, and by sampling uniformly random states and using a modern solver to obtain upper bounds on their distance, a standard concentration bound allows us to confidently state that the average distance is around $18.32 \pm 0.1$, from where the diameter is at most $36$.

Erdős and Guy initiated a line of research studying $μ_k(n)$, the minimum number of convex $k$-gons one can obtain by placing $n$ points in the plane without any three of them being collinear. Asymptotically, the limits $c_k := \lim_{n\to \infty} μ_k(n)/\binom{n}{k}$ exist for all $k$, and are strictly positive due to the Erdős-Szekeres theorem. This article focuses on the case $k=5$, where $c_5$ was known to be between $0.0608516$ and $0.0625$ (Goaoc et al., 2018; Subercaseaux et al., 2023). The lower bound was obtained through the Flag Algebra method of Razborov using semi-definite programming. In this article we prove a more modest lower bound of $\frac{5\sqrt{5}-11}{4} \approx 0.04508$ without any computation; we exploit``planar-point equations'' that count, in different ways, the number of convex pentagons (or other geometric objects) in a point placement. To derive our lower bound we combine such equations by viewing them from a statistical perspective, which we believe can be fruitful for other related problems.

We present and analyze PackIt!, a turn-based game consisting of packing rectangles on an $n \times n$ grid. PackIt! can be easily played on paper, either as a competitive two-player game or in \emph{solitaire} fashion. On the $t$-th turn, a rectangle of area $t$ or $t+1$ must be placed in the grid. In the two-player format of PackIt! whichever player places a rectangle last wins, whereas the goal in the solitaire variant is to perfectly pack the $n \times n$ grid. We analyze conditions for the existence of a perfect packing over $n \times n$, then present an automated reasoning approach that allows finding perfect games of PackIt! up to $n = 50$ which includes a novel SAT-encoding technique of independent interest, and conclude by proving an NP-hardness result.

A packing $k$-coloring is a natural variation on the standard notion of graph $k$-coloring, where vertices are assigned numbers from $\{1, \ldots, k\}$, and any two vertices assigned a common color $c \in \{1, \ldots, k\}$ need to be at a distance greater than $c$ (as opposed to $1$, in standard graph colorings). Despite a sequence of incremental work, determining the packing chromatic number of the infinite square grid has remained an open problem since its introduction in 2002. We culminate the search by proving this number to be 15. We achieve this result by improving the best-known method for this problem by roughly two orders of magnitude. The most important technique to boost performance is a novel and surprisingly effective propositional encoding. Additionally, we developed a new symmetry-breaking method. Since both new techniques are more complex than existing techniques for this problem, a verified approach is required to trust them. We include both techniques in a proof of unsatisfiability, reducing the trusted core to the correctness of the direct encoding.