arXiv++ Combinatorics

There are several methods for searching for graphs with prescribed properties, such as SAT solvers and specialized generators. These methods return the result as raw data: an adjacency matrix or a string encoding. The raw data certifies that the graph exists, but it does not reveal any structural properties of the graph. We ask whether one can automatically discover a short algebraic description if only this raw data is provided. We look for a description such as a Cayley graph $\mathrm{Cay}(Γ, S)$ or a lexicographic product $C_5[K_3]$. We address this question with a neurosymbolic approach. We propose an agent that runs on a general-purpose large language model with no fine-tuning or per-target training. The model interleaves reasoning with calls to the computer algebra system SageMath: it analyzes the target graph, proposes and tests candidate constructions, and revises them until the output matches the target. The agent communicates with SageMath through a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server, which we release as a general-purpose bridge. Whether a construction matches the target is checked by a single exact isomorphism test, and therefore rests on the symbolic side and not on the model. We test the approach on a benchmark of 100 highly symmetric graphs, namely two-orbit graphs on up to 25 vertices; the benchmark was fixed in advance. Our agent could find verified algebraic constructions for all of them, without falling back to raw encodings. A strong template-enumeration baseline reaches only about $20\%$, and a catalog lookup could not identify any of these graphs. However, construction quality declines when symmetry is removed. As a concrete application, we identify the smallest known counterexample to the Bernhart-Kainen dispersability conjecture, a $16$-vertex graph that enumeration found as raw data. For this graph, our agent found an explicit algebraic construction.

We present an approach to enumerate graphs whose automorphism group has exactly two orbits. Our method exploits the observation that we can enumerate all graphs whose automorphism group contains a given this permutation group. We obtain the relevant groups via Goursat's lemma. In order to scale the enumeration, we employ additional optimizations that prune irrelevant groups. In total, we enumerate, for the first time, all connected two-orbit graphs of up to 27 vertices, totaling 10,094,721 graphs, pushing the state of the art well beyond what direct enumeration methods can achieve.

We study mathematical discovery through the lens of neurosymbolic reasoning, where an AI agent powered by a large language model (LLM), coupled with symbolic computation tools, and human strategic direction, jointly produced a new result in combinatorial design theory. The main result of this human-AI collaboration is a tight lower bound on the imbalance of Latin squares for the notoriously difficult case $n \equiv 1 \pmod{3}$. We reconstruct the discovery process from detailed interaction logs spanning multiple sessions over several days and identify the distinct cognitive contributions of each component. The AI agent proved effective at uncovering hidden structure and generating hypotheses. The symbolic component consists of computer algebra, constraint solvers, and simulated annealing, which provides rigorous verification and exhaustive enumeration. Human steering supplied the critical research pivot that transformed a dead end into a productive inquiry. Our analysis reveals that multi-model deliberation among frontier LLMs proved reliable for criticism and error detection but unreliable for constructive claims. The resulting human-AI mathematical contribution, a tight lower bound of $4n(n{-}1)/9$, is achieved via a novel class of near-perfect permutations. The bound was formally verified in Lean 4. Our experiments show that neurosymbolic systems can indeed produce genuine discoveries in pure mathematics.

Norin (2008) conjectured that any $2$-edge-coloring of the hypercube $Q_n$ in which antipodal edges receive different colors must contain a monochromatic path between some pair of antipodal vertices. While the general conjecture remains elusive, progress thus far has been made on two fronts: finite cases and asymptotic relaxations. The best finite results are due to Frankston and Scheinerman (2024) who verified the conjecture for $n \leq 7$ using SAT solvers, and the best asymptotic result is due to Dvořák (2020), who showed that every $2$-edge-coloring of $Q_n$ admits an antipodal path of length $n$ with at most $0.375n + o(n)$ color changes. We improve on both fronts via SAT. First, we extend the verification to $n = 8$ by introducing a more compact and efficient SAT encoding, enhanced with symmetry breaking and cube-and-conquer parallelism. The versatility of this new encoding allows us to recast parts of Dvořák's asymptotic approach as a SAT problem, thereby improving the asymptotic upper bound to $0.3125n + O(1)$ color changes. Our work demonstrates how SAT-based methods can yield not only finite-case confirmations but also asymptotic progress on combinatorial conjectures.

The graph invariant twin-width was recently introduced by Bonnet, Kim, Thomassé, and Watrigan. Problems expressible in first-order logic, which includes many prominent NP-hard problems, are tractable on graphs of bounded twin-width if a certificate for the twin-width bound is provided as an input. Computing such a certificate, however, is an intrinsic problem, for which no nontrivial algorithm is known. In this paper, we propose the first practical approach for computing the twin-width of graphs together with the corresponding certificate. We propose efficient SAT-encodings that rely on a characterization of twin-width based on elimination sequences. This allows us to determine the twin-width of many famous graphs with previously unknown twin-width. We utilize our encodings to identify the smallest graphs for a given twin-width bound $d \in \{1,\dots,4\}$.

There are various approaches to exploiting "hidden structure" in instances of hard combinatorial problems to allow faster algorithms than for general unstructured or random instances. For SAT and its counting version #SAT, hidden structure has been exploited in terms of decomposability and strong backdoor sets. Decomposability can be considered in terms of the treewidth of a graph that is associated with the given CNF formula, for instance by considering clauses and variables as vertices of the graph, and making a variable adjacent with all the clauses it appears in. On the other hand, a strong backdoor set of a CNF formula is a set of variables such that each possible partial assignment to this set moves the formula into a fixed class for which (#)SAT can be solved in polynomial time. In this paper we combine the two above approaches. In particular, we study the algorithmic question of finding a small strong backdoor set into the class W_t of CNF formulas whose associated graphs have treewidth at most t. The main results are positive: (1) There is a cubic-time algorithm that, given a CNF formula F and two constants k,t\ge 0, either finds a strong W_t-backdoor set of size at most 2^k, or concludes that F has no strong W_t-backdoor set of size at most k. (2) There is a cubic-time algorithm that, given a CNF formula F, computes the number of satisfying assignments of F or concludes that sb_t(F)>k, for any pair of constants k,t\ge 0. Here, sb_t(F) denotes the size of a smallest strong W_t-backdoor set of F. The significance of our results lies in the fact that they allow us to exploit algorithmically a hidden structure in formulas that is not accessible by any one of the two approaches (decomposability, backdoors) alone. Already a backdoor size 1 on top of treewidth 1 (i.e., sb_1(F)=1) entails formulas of arbitrarily large treewidth and arbitrarily large cycle cutsets.

Knuth (1990) introduced the class of nested formulas and showed that their satisfiability can be decided in polynomial time. We show that, parameterized by the size of a smallest strong backdoor set to the target class of nested formulas, checking the satisfiability of any CNF formula is fixed-parameter tractable. Thus, for any k>0, the satisfiability problem can be solved in polynomial time for any formula F for which there exists a variable set B of size at most k such that for every truth assignment t to B, the formula F[t] is nested; moreover, the degree of the polynomial is independent of k. Our algorithm uses the grid-minor theorem of Robertson and Seymour (1986) to either find that the incidence graph of the formula has bounded treewidth - a case that is solved using model checking for monadic second order logic - or to find many vertex-disjoint obstructions in the incidence graph. For the latter case, new combinatorial arguments are used to find a small backdoor set. Combining both cases leads to an approximation algorithm producing a strong backdoor set whose size is upper bounded by a function of the optimum. Going through all assignments to this set of variables and using Knuth's algorithm, the satisfiability of the input formula is decided.

Backdoor sets, a notion introduced by Williams et al. in 2003, are certain sets of key variables of a CNF formula F that make it easy to solve the formula; by assigning truth values to the variables in a backdoor set, the formula gets reduced to one or several polynomial-time solvable formulas. More specifically, a weak backdoor set of F is a set X of variables such that there exits a truth assignment t to X that reduces F to a satisfiable formula F[t] that belongs to a polynomial-time decidable base class C. A strong backdoor set is a set X of variables such that for all assignments t to X, the reduced formula F[t] belongs to C. We study the problem of finding backdoor sets of size at most k with respect to the base class of CNF formulas with acyclic incidence graphs, taking k as the parameter. We show that 1. the detection of weak backdoor sets is W[2]-hard in general but fixed-parameter tractable for r-CNF formulas, for any fixed r>=3, and 2. the detection of strong backdoor sets is fixed-parameter approximable. Result 1 is the the first positive one for a base class that does not have a characterization with obstructions of bounded size. Result 2 is the first positive one for a base class for which strong backdoor sets are more powerful than deletion backdoor sets. Not only SAT, but also #SAT can be solved in polynomial time for CNF formulas with acyclic incidence graphs. Hence Result 2 establishes a new structural parameter that makes #SAT fixed-parameter tractable and that is incomparable with known parameters such as treewidth and clique-width. We obtain the algorithms by a combination of an algorithmic version of the Erdös-Pósa Theorem, Courcelle's model checking for monadic second order logic, and new combinatorial results on how disjoint cycles can interact with the backdoor set.

A backdoor set is a set of variables of a propositional formula such that fixing the truth values of the variables in the backdoor set moves the formula into some polynomial-time decidable class. If we know a small backdoor set we can reduce the question of whether the given formula is satisfiable to the same question for one or several easy formulas that belong to the tractable class under consideration. In this survey we review parameterized complexity results for problems that arise in the context of backdoor sets, such as the problem of finding a backdoor set of size at most k, parameterized by k. We also discuss recent results on backdoor sets for problems that are beyond NP.

(k,s)-SAT is the satisfiability problem restricted to instances where each clause has exactly k literals and every variable occurs at most s times. It is known that there exists a function f such that for s\leq f(k) all (k,s)-SAT instances are satisfiable, but (k,f(k)+1)-SAT is already NP-complete (k\geq 3). The best known lower and upper bounds on f(k) are Omega(2^k/k) and O(2^k/k^a), where a=\log_3 4 - 1 = 0.26.... We prove that f(k) = O(2^k \cdot \log k/k), which is tight up to a \log k factor.