arXiv++ Combinatorics

A 1-11-representation of a graph $G(V,E)$ is a word over the alphabet $V$ such that two distinct vertices $x$ and $y$ are adjacent if and only if the restricted word $w{x,y}$ (obtained from $w$ by deleting all letters except $x$ and $y$) contains at most one occurrence of $xx$ or $yy$. Although every graph admits a 1-11-representation, the repetition patterns that may or must appear in such representations have not been fully studied. In this paper, we study cube-free and square-free 1-11-representations of graphs. We first show that cubes cannot always be avoided in 1-11-representations of minimum length by providing a graph for which every minimum-length 1-11-representation necessarily contains a cube. We then focus on permutational 1-11-representations, where the representing word is a concatenation of permutations of the vertex set. In this setting, we prove that any cube appearing in a permutational 1-11-representation can be removed without changing the represented graph. As a consequence, every permutational 1-11-representation attaining the permutational 1-11-representation number is cube-free. We further show that this behaviour does not extend to squares by providing a graph for which every permutational 1-11-representation with the minimum number of permutations necessarily contains a square. Finally, we prove that the language of all 1-11-representations of a given graph is regular. Moreover, we show that the language of all permutational 1-11-representations of a graph is also regular.

A graph $G = (V, E)$ is said to be word-representable if there exists a word $w$ over the alphabet $V$ such that, for any two distinct letters $x, y \in V$, the letters $x$ and $y$ alternate in $w$ if and only if $xy \in E$. A graph is co-bipartite if its complement is bipartite. Therefore, the vertex set of a co-bipartite graph can be partitioned into two disjoint subsets $X$ and $Y$ such that the subgraphs induced by $X$ and $Y$ are cliques. The concept of word-representability for graph classes has gained significant attention in recent years. The book Words and Graphs by Sergey Kitaev and Vadim Lozin presents examples of co-bipartite graphs that are not word-representable. It is known that a graph is word-representable if and only if it admits a semi-transitive orientation. Although the necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of a semi-transitive orientation in co-bipartite graphs have been established, the characterization based on vertex ordering remains open. In this paper, we present necessary and sufficient conditions for a co-bipartite graph to be word-representable in terms of its vertex ordering. Furthermore, based on this vertex ordering, we provide an algorithm to construct a $3$-uniform word-representation for any word-representable co-bipartite graph. Using this result, we prove that except for the permutation graphs, the representation number of all other word-representable co-bipartite graphs is $3$.

A graph G(V, E) is word-representable if there exists a word w over V such that distinct letters x and y alternate in w iff $xy \in E$. We introduce p-complete squares and p-complete square-free word-representable graphs. A word is p-complete square-free if no induced subword over any subset of letters contains a square XX with $|X| \ge p$. A graph is p-complete square-free if it admits such a representation. We define p-complete square-free uniform word-representations and study their properties. We show that any graph admitting such a representation forbids Kp as an induced subgraph and that the recognition problem is NP-hard for arbitrary p. For p=1 and 2, we give complete characterisations. We prove that every $K_p$-free circle graph admits a p-complete square-free uniform representation and that any 3-complete square-free uniform word-representable graph has representation number at most three. We present a constructive method for generating new examples for p=3.

A graph $G = (V, E)$ is word-representable, if there exists a word $w$ over the alphabet $V$ such that for letters $\{x,y\}\in V$, $x$ and $y$ alternate in $w$ if and only if $xy \in E$. A graph is co-bipartite if its complement is a bipartite graph. Therefore, the vertex set of a co-bipartite graph can be partitioned into two disjoint cliques. The concept of word-representability for co-bipartite graphs has not yet been fully studied. In the book Words and Graphs written by Sergey Kitaev and Vadim Lozin, examples of co-bipartite graphs that are not word-representable are provided. The authors have stated that it remains an open problem to characterize word-representable co-bipartite graphs. It is known that taking the complement of word-representable graphs does not preserve their word-representability. In this paper, we first identify certain classes of bipartite graphs for which word-representation is preserved after the complement operation. We found that the complement of the path graphs, even cycle graphs and generalized crown graphs are also word-representable. Next, we aim to find word-representable co-bipartite graphs in which the size of one clique partition is fixed while the other one can vary. We studied the word-representability of co-bipartite graphs where the sizes of one clique partition are $2$ and $3$. We found that any co-bipartite graphs where the size of the one clique partition is $2$ are word-representable. Also, when the size of the one clique partition is $3$, we found certain co-bipartite graphs are word-representable. Additionally, for word-representable graphs, it has been established that a graph is word-representable if and only if it can be oriented in a specific manner, known as semi-transitive orientation. We provide the necessary and sufficient conditions for a co-bipartite graph to have a semi-transitive orientation.

A graph $G = (V, E)$ is word-representable, if there exists a word w over the alphabet V such that for letters ${x, y} \in V$ , $x$ and $y$ alternate in $w$ if and only if $xy \in E$. In this paper, we prove that any non-empty word-representable graph can be represented by a word containing no non-trivial squares. This result provides a positive answer to the open problem present in the book Words and graphs written by Sergey Kitaev, and Vadim Lozin. Also, we prove that for a word-representable graph $G$, if the representation number of $G$ is $k$, then every $k$-uniform word representing the graph $G$ is also square-free. Moreover, we prove that every minimal-length word representing a graph is square-free. Then, we count the number of possible square-free word-representations of a complete graph. At last, using the infinite square-free string generated from the Thue-Morse sequence, we prove that infinitely many square-free words represent a non-complete connected word-representable graph.