arXiv++ Combinatorics

The hydrophobic-polar (HP) model represents proteins as binary strings embedded in lattices, with fold quality measured by an energy score. We prove that the optimal fold energy is not monotonic under concatenation for several standard lattices, including the 2D and 3D rectangular, hexagonal, and triangular lattices. In other words, concatenating two polymers can produce a fold with strictly worse optimal energy than one of the polymers alone. For closed chains, we show that under the levels-of-hydrophobicity model of Agarwala et al. (1997), proper links can arise as uniquely optimal folds, revealing an unexpected connection between HP models and knot/link theory.

For a complexity function $C$, the lower and upper $C$-complexity rates of an infinite word $\mathbf{x}$ are \[ \underline{C}(\mathbf x)=\liminf_{n\to\infty} \frac{C(\mathbf{x}\upharpoonright n)}n,\quad \overline{C}(\mathbf x)=\limsup_{n\to\infty} \frac{C(\mathbf{x}\upharpoonright n)}n \] respectively. Here $\mathbf{x}\upharpoonright n$ is the prefix of $x$ of length $n$. We consider the case $C=\mathrm{A_N}$, the nondeterministic automatic complexity. If these rates are strictly between 0 and $1/2$, we call them intermediate. Our main result is that words having intermediate $\mathrm{A_N}$-rates exist, viz. the infinite Fibonacci and Tribonacci words.

We show that the digraph of a nondeterministic finite automaton witnessing the automatic complexity of a word can always be taken to be planar. In the case of total transition functions studied by Shallit and Wang, planarity can fail. Let $s_q(n)$ be the number of binary words $x$ of length $n$ having nondeterministic automatic complexity $A_N(x)=q$. We show that $s_q$ is eventually constant for each $q$ and that the eventual constant value of $s_q$ is computable.

Câmpeanu and Ho (2004) determined the maximum finite state complexity of finite languages, building on work of Champarnaud and Pin (1989). They stated that it is very difficult to determine the number of maximum-complexity languages. Here we give a formula for this number. We also generalize their work from languages to functions on finite sets.

Let $x$ be an $m$-sequence, a maximal length sequence produced by a linear feedback shift register. We show that $x$ has maximal subword complexity function in the sense of Allouche and Shallit. We show that this implies that the nondeterministic automatic complexity $A_N(x)$ is close to maximal: $n/2-A_N(x)=O(\log^2n)$, where $n$ is the length of $x$. In contrast, Hyde has shown $A_N(y)\le n/2+1$ for all sequences $y$ of length $n$.