arXiv++ Combinatorics

We prove two results on the fine structure of the binary digits of $3^{m}$. First, for every fixed period $p$, the number of positions at which the binary expansion of $3^{m}$ breaks $p$-periodicity grows in order like $\log m/\log\log m$; equivalently, no window of the expansion deeper than a fixed power of $\log m$ is $p$-periodic. Second, the finite binary word formed by the low-order digits of $3^{m}$ has full low-order subword complexity: its complexity function satisfies $\pcx_{3^{m}}(n)\ge n+1$ for every length $n$, once $m$ is large enough.

We construct automata with input(s) in base $k$ recognizing some basic relations and study their number of states. We also consider some basic operations on $k$-automatic sequences and discuss their state complexity. We find a relationship between subword complexity of the interior sequence $(h'(i))_{i \geq 0}$ and state complexity of the linear subsequence $(h(ni+c))_{i \geq 0}$. We resolve a recent question of Zantema and Bosma about linear subsequences of $k$-automatic sequences with input in most-significant-digit-first format. We also discuss the state complexity and runtime complexity of using a reasonable interpretation of Büchi arithmetic to actually construct some of the studied automata recognizing relations or carrying out operations on automatic sequences.

Let $ξ$ be a real number and $b \ge 2$ an integer. We study the relationship between the irrationality exponent of $ξ$ and the subword complexity $p(n, \mathbf{x})$ of the $b$-ary expansion $\mathbf{x}$ of $ξ$, where $p(n, \mathbf{x})$ counts the number of distinct blocks of length $n$ in $\mathbf{x}$, for $n \ge 1$. If the irrationality exponent of $ξ$ is equal to $2$, which is the case for almost all real numbers $ξ$, we show that the limit superior of the sequence $(p(n, \mathbf{x}) / n)_{n \ge 1}$ is at least equal to 4/3. The proof is based on a careful study of the evolution of the Rauzy graphs of infinite words of low complexity.

In 2017, Clark Kimberling defined an interesting sequence ${\bf B} = 0100101100 \cdots$ of $0$'s and $1$'s by certain inflation rules, and he made a number of conjectures about this sequence and some related ones. In this note we prove his conjectures using, in part, the Walnut theorem-prover. We show how his word is related to the infinite Tribonacci word, and we determine both the subword complexity and critical exponent of $\bf B$.

The complexity of an infinite word can be measured in several ways, the two most common measures being the subword complexity and the abelian complexity. In 2015, Rigo and Salimov introduced a family of intermediate complexities indexed by $k\in\mathbb{N}_{>0}$: the $k$-binomial complexities. These complexities scale up from the abelian complexity, with which the $1$-binomial complexity coincides, to the subword complexity, to which they converge pointwise as $k$ tends to $\infty$. In this article, we provide four classes of $d$-ary infinite words -- namely, $d$-ary $1$-balanced words, words with subword complexity $n\in\mathbb{N}_{>0}\mapsto n+(d-1)$ (which form a subclass of quasi-Sturmian words), hypercubic billiard words, and words obtained by coloring a Sturmian word with another Sturmian word -- for which this scale ``collapses'', that is, for which all $k$-binomial complexities, for $k\geq 2$, coincide with the subword complexity. This work generalizes a result of Rigo and Salimov, established in their seminal 2015 paper, which asserts that the $k$-binomial complexity of any Sturmian word coincides with its subword complexity whenever $k\geq 2$.

The paperfolding sequences form an uncountable class of infinite sequences over the alphabet $\{ -1, 1 \}$ that describe the sequence of folds arising from iterated folding of a piece of paper, followed by unfolding. In this note we observe that the sequence of run lengths in such a sequence, as well as the starting and ending positions of the $n$'th run, is $2$-synchronized and hence computable by a finite automaton. As a specific consequence, we obtain the recent results of Bunder, Bates, and Arnold, in much more generality, via a different approach. We also prove results about the critical exponent and subword complexity of these run-length sequences.

We provide an example of a virtually $2$-step nilpotent group, and a specific generating set, for which the Green series (sometimes called cogrowth series) is not D-finite. The proof relies on an arithmetical miracle, and the study of the subword complexity of a multiplicative sequence coming out of it.

We fully classify automatic sequences $a$ over a finite alphabet $Ω$ with the property that each word over $Ω$ appears is $a$ along an arithmetic progression. Using the terminology introduced by Avgustinovich, Fon-Der-Flaass and Frid, these are the automatic sequences with the maximal possible arithmetical subword complexity. More generally, we obtain an asymptotic formula for arithmetical (and even polynomial) subword complexity of a given automatic sequence $a$.

We study the notion of an asymptotically automatic sequence, which generalises the notion of an automatic sequence. While $k$-automatic sequences are characterised by finiteness of $k$-kernels, the $k$-kernels of asymptotically $k$-automatic sequences are only required to be finite up to equality almost everywhere. We prove basic closure properties and a linear bound on asymptotic subword complexity, show that results concerning frequencies of symbols are no longer true for the asymptotic analogue, and discuss some classification problems.

We study bracket words, which are a far-reaching generalisation of Sturmian words, along Hardy field sequences, which are a far-reaching generalisation of Piatetski--Shapiro sequences $\lfloor n^c \rfloor$. We show that thus obtained sequences are deterministic (i.e., they have sub-exponential subword complexity) and satisfy Sarnak's conjecture.

Inspired by Pansiot's work on substitutions, we prove a similar theorem for automorphisms of a free group F of finite rank: if a right-infinite word X represents an attracting fixed point of an automorphism of F, the subword complexity of X is equivalent to n, n log log n, n log n, or n^2. The proof uses combinatorial arguments analogue to Pansiot's as well as train tracks. We also define the recurrence complexity of X, and we apply it to laminations. In particular, we show that attracting laminations have complexity equivalent to n, n log log n, n log n, or n^2 (to n if the automorphism is fully irreducible).

Generalised polynomials are maps constructed by applying the floor function, addition, and multiplication to polynomials. Despite superficial similarity, generalised polynomials exhibit many phenomena which are impossible for polynomials. In particular, there exist generalised polynomial sequences which take only finitely many values without being periodic; examples of such sequences include the Sturmian words, as well as more complicated sequences like $[ 2\{ πn^2 + \sqrt{2}n[\sqrt{3}n] \}]$. The purpose of this paper is to investigate letter-to-letter codings of finitely-valued generalised polynomial sequences, which we call \emph{bracket words}, from the point of view of combinatorics on words. We survey existing results on generalised polynomials and their corollaries in terms of bracket words, and also prove several new results. Our main contribution is a polynomial bound on the subword complexity of bracket words.

We study the properties of the uncountable set of Stewart words. These are Toeplitz words specified by infinite sequences of Toeplitz patterns of the form $αβγ$, where $α,β,γ$ is any permutation of the symbols 0,1,?. We determine the critical exponent of the Stewart words, prove that they avoid the pattern $xxyyxx$, find all factors that are palindromes, and determine their subword complexity. An interesting aspect of our work is that we use automata-theoretic methods and a decision procedure for automata to carry out the proofs.

Automatic sequences are not suitable sequences for cryptographic applications since both their subword complexity and their expansion complexity are small, and their correlation measure of order 2 is large. These sequences are highly predictable despite having a large maximum order complexity. However, recent results show that polynomial subsequences of automatic sequences, such as the Thue--Morse sequence, are better candidates for pseudorandom sequences. A natural generalization of automatic sequences are morphic sequences, given by a fixed point of a prolongeable morphism that is not necessarily uniform. In this paper we prove a lower bound for the maximum order complexity of the sum of digits function in Zeckendorf base which is an example of a morphic sequence. We also prove that the polynomial subsequences of this sequence keep large maximum order complexity, such as the Thue--Morse sequence.

Recently Dekking conjectured the form of the subword complexity function for the Fibonacci-Thue-Morse sequence. In this note we prove his conjecture by purely computational means, using the free software Walnut.

We begin a systematic study of the relations between subword complexity of infinite words and their power avoidance. Among other things, we show that -- the Thue-Morse word has the minimum possible subword complexity over all overlap-free binary words and all $(\frac 73)$-power-free binary words, but not over all $(\frac 73)^+$-power-free binary words; -- the twisted Thue-Morse word has the maximum possible subword complexity over all overlap-free binary words, but no word has the maximum subword complexity over all $(\frac 73)$-power-free binary words; -- if some word attains the minimum possible subword complexity over all square-free ternary words, then one such word is the ternary Thue word; -- the recently constructed 1-2-bonacci word has the minimum possible subword complexity over all \textit{symmetric} square-free ternary words.

Let $x$ be an $m$-sequence, a maximal length sequence produced by a linear feedback shift register. We show that $x$ has maximal subword complexity function in the sense of Allouche and Shallit. We show that this implies that the nondeterministic automatic complexity $A_N(x)$ is close to maximal: $n/2-A_N(x)=O(\log^2n)$, where $n$ is the length of $x$. In contrast, Hyde has shown $A_N(y)\le n/2+1$ for all sequences $y$ of length $n$.

In this article, we prove that for a completely multiplicative function $f$ from $\mathbb{N}^*$ to a field $K$ such that the set $$\{p \;|\; f(p)\neq 1_K \;\mbox{and }p \mbox{ is prime}\}$$ is finite, the asymptotic subword complexity of $f$ is $Θ(n^t)$, where $t$ is the number of primes $p$ that $f(p)\neq 0_K, 1_K$. This proves in particular that sequences like $((-1)^{v_2(n)+v_3(n)})_n$ are not $k$-automatic for $k\geq 2$.

We find an explicit closed form for the subword complexity of the infinite fixed point of the morphism sending $a \rightarrow aab$ and $b \rightarrow b$. This morphism is then generalized in three different ways, and we find similar explicit expressions for the subword complexity of the generalizations.

We study structure of pure morphic and morphic sequences and prove the following result: the subword complexity of arbitrary morphic sequence is either $Θ(n^{1+1/k})$ for some $k\in\mathbb N$, or is $O(n \log n)$.