arXiv++ Combinatorics

The search for Hamiltonian cycles in vertex-transitive graphs and digraphs is a classical problem at the interface of graph theory and group theory. In the undirected setting, this goes back to famous conjectures of Lovász and Thomassen predicting that every sufficiently large connected vertex-transitive graph is Hamiltonian. The directed analogue has an even richer history, originating with Rankin in 1946, naturally translating the search for long cycles into classical group rearrangement problems. It was shown by Trotter and Erdős in 1978 that connected vertex-transitive digraphs need not be Hamiltonian. In 1981, Alspach asked whether there exist connected vertex-transitive digraphs whose longest directed cycle misses arbitrarily many vertices. This question was only recently resolved by Bucić, Hendrey, Mohar, Steiner and Yepremyan, who constructed connected vertex-transitive digraphs on $n$ vertices whose longest directed cycle omits $(1-o(1))\log n$ vertices. They further conjectured that the number of omitted vertices can grow linearly with $n$, remarking that it would already be interesting to improve their logarithmic lower bound to a polynomial bound. In this paper, we confirm their conjecture in a strong form by constructing infinitely many connected vertex-transitive digraphs on $n$ vertices whose longest directed cycle omits at least $n/12$ vertices. In the same work, Bucić, Hendrey, Mohar, Steiner and Yepremyan also proved that every connected vertex-transitive digraph on $n$ vertices contains a directed cycle of length $Ω(n^{1/3})$, giving the first lower bound for this problem that grows with $n$. We improve this to $Ω(\sqrt n)$, matching the order of Babai's classical theorem from 1979 for undirected vertex-transitive graphs.

Addressing questions raised in recent papers, we study the $r$-distance graph $H_r(n)$ on the Boolean cube $\{0,1\}^n$, where two vertices are adjacent if their Hamming distance is exactly $r$. For fixed integers $s \ge 2$ and even $r \ge 2$, we determine the asymptotic order of the $s$-independence number $α_s(H_r(n))$, showing that \[ α_s\left(H_r(n)\right)=Θ\left(\frac{2^n}{n^{r/2}}\right). \] The upper bound is derived via a reduction to extremal problems for sunflower-free set systems, while the lower bound is obtained using algebraic constructions based on BCH codes and constant-weight codes.

Stability is a well investigated concept in extremal combinatorics. The main idea is that if some object is close in size to an extremal object, then it retains the structure of the extremal construction. In the present paper we study stability in the context of forbidden configurations. $(0,1)$-matrix $F$ is a configuration in a $(0,1)$-matrix $A$ if $F$ is a row and columns permutation of a submatrix of $A$. $\mathrm{Avoid}(m,F)$ denotes the set of $m$-rowed $(0,1)$-matrices with pairwise distinct columns without configuration $F$, $\mathrm{forb}(m,F)$ is the largest number of columns of a matrix in $\mathrm{Avoid}(m,F)$, while $\mathrm{ext}(m,F)$ is the set of matrices in $\mathrm{Avoid}(m,F)$ of size $\mathrm{forb}(m,F)$. We show cases (i) when each element of $\mathrm{Avoid}(m,F)$ have the structure of element(s) in $\mathrm{ext}(m,F)$, (ii) $\mathrm{forb}(m,F)=Θ(m^2)$ and the size of $A\in \mathrm{Avoid}(m,F)$ deviates from $\mathrm{forb}(m,F)$ by a linear amount, or (iii) $\mathrm{forb}(m,F)=Θ(m)$ and the size of $A$ is smaller by a constant, then the structure of $A$ is same as the structure of a matrix in $\mathrm{ext}(m,F)$.