arXiv++ Combinatorics

Let $F$ be a $k\times \ell$ (0,1)-matrix. A matrix is simple if it is a (0,1)-matrix with no repeated columns. A (0,1)-matrix $A$ is said to have a $F$ as a configuration if there is a submatrix of $A$ which is a row and column permutation of $F$. In the language of sets, a configuration is a trace. Let $\mathrm{Avoid}(m,F)$ be all simple $m$-rowed matrices $A$ with no configuration $F$. Define $\mathrm{forb}(m,F)$ as the maximum number of columns of any matrix in $\mathrm{Avoid}(m,F)$. The $2\times (p+1)$ (0,1)-matrix $F(0,p,1,0)$ consists of a row of $p$ 1's and a row of one 1 in the remaining column. The paper determines $\mathrm{forb}(m,F(0,p,1,0))$ for $1\le p\le 9$ and the extremal matrices are characterized. A construction may be extremal for all $p$.

Let $F$ be a $k\times \ell$ (0,1)-matrix. Define a (0,1)-matrix $A$ to have a $F$ as a \emph{configuration} if there is a submatrix of $A$ which is a row and column permutation of $F$. In the language of sets, a configuration is a \emph{trace}. Define a matrix to be {\it simple} if it is a (0,1)-matrix with no repeated columns. Let $\mathrm{Avoid}(m,F)$ be all simple $m$-rowed matrices $A$ with no configuration $F$. Define $\mathrm{forb}(m,F)$ as the maximum number of columns of any matrix in $\mathrm{Avoid}(m,F)$. Determining $\mathrm{forb}(m,F)$ requires determining bounds and constructions of matrices in $\mathrm{Avoid}(m,F)$. The paper considers some column maximal $k$-rowed simple $F$ that have the bound $Θ(m^{k-2})$ and yet adding a column increases bound to $Ω(m^{k-1})$. By a construction, $\mathrm{forb(m,F)}$ is determined exactly.

Stability is a well investigated concept in extremal combinatorics. The main idea is that if some object is close in size to an extremal object, then it retains the structure of the extremal construction. In the present paper we study stability in the context of forbidden configurations. $(0,1)$-matrix $F$ is a configuration in a $(0,1)$-matrix $A$ if $F$ is a row and columns permutation of a submatrix of $A$. $\mathrm{Avoid}(m,F)$ denotes the set of $m$-rowed $(0,1)$-matrices with pairwise distinct columns without configuration $F$, $\mathrm{forb}(m,F)$ is the largest number of columns of a matrix in $\mathrm{Avoid}(m,F)$, while $\mathrm{ext}(m,F)$ is the set of matrices in $\mathrm{Avoid}(m,F)$ of size $\mathrm{forb}(m,F)$. We show cases (i) when each element of $\mathrm{Avoid}(m,F)$ have the structure of element(s) in $\mathrm{ext}(m,F)$, (ii) $\mathrm{forb}(m,F)=Θ(m^2)$ and the size of $A\in \mathrm{Avoid}(m,F)$ deviates from $\mathrm{forb}(m,F)$ by a linear amount, or (iii) $\mathrm{forb}(m,F)=Θ(m)$ and the size of $A$ is smaller by a constant, then the structure of $A$ is same as the structure of a matrix in $\mathrm{ext}(m,F)$.

Balogh and Bollobás [{\em Combinatorica 25, 2005}] prove that for any $k$ there is a constant $f(k)$ such that any set system with at least $f(k)$ sets reduces to a $k$-star, an $k$-costar or an $k$-chain. They proved $f(k)<(2k)^{2^k}$. Here we improve it to $f(k)<2^{ck^2}$ for some constant $c>0$. This is a special case of the following result on the multi-coloured forbidden configurations at 2 colours. Let $r$ be given. Then there exists a constant $c_r$ so that a matrix with entries drawn from $\{0,1,...,r-1\}$ with at least $2^{c_rk^2}$ different columns will have a $k\times k$ submatrix that can have its rows and columns permuted so that in the resulting matrix will be either $I_k(a,b)$ or $T_k(a,b)$ (for some $a\ne b\in \{0,1,..., r-1\}$), where $I_k(a,b)$ is the $k\times k$ matrix with $a$'s on the diagonal and $b$'s else where, $T_k(a,b)$ the $k\times k$ matrix with $a$'s below the diagonal and $b$'s elsewhere. We also extend to considering the bound on the number of distinct columns, given that the number of rows is $m$, when avoiding a $t k\times k$ matrix obtained by taking any one of the $k \times k$ matrices above and repeating each column $t$ times. We use Ramsey Theory.

Let $t\ge 1$ be a given integer. Let ${\cal F}$ be a family of subsets of $[m]=\{1,2,\ldots,m\}$. Assume that for every pair of disjoint sets $S,T\subset [m]$ with $|S|=|T|=k$, there do not exist $2t$ sets in ${\cal F}$ where $t$ subsets of ${\cal F}$ contain $S$ and are disjoint from $T$ and $t$ subsets of ${\cal F}$ contain $T$ and are disjoint from $S$. We show that $|{\cal F}|$ is $O(m^{k})$. Our main new ingredient is allowing, during the inductive proof, multisets of subsets of $[m]$ where the multiplicity of a given set is bounded by $t-1$. We use a strong stability result of Anstee and Keevash. This is further evidence for a conjecture of Anstee and Sali. These problems can be stated in the language of matrices Let $t\cdot M$ denote $t$ copies of the matrix $M$ concatenated together. We have established the conjecture for those configurations $t\cdot F$ for any $k\times 2$ (0,1)-matrix $F$.