arXiv++ Combinatorics

Many important problems in Bioinformatics (e.g., assembly or multi-assembly) admit multiple solutions, while the final objective is to report only one. A common approach to deal with this uncertainty is finding safe partial solutions (e.g., contigs) which are common to all solutions. Previous research on safety has focused on polynomially-time solvable problems, whereas many successful and natural models are NP-hard to solve, leaving a lack of "safety tools" for such problems. We propose the first method for computing all safe solutions for an NP-hard problem, minimum flow decomposition. We obtain our results by developing a "safety test" for paths based on a general Integer Linear Programming (ILP) formulation. Moreover, we provide implementations with practical optimizations aimed to reduce the total ILP time, the most efficient of these being based on a recursive group-testing procedure. Results: Experimental results on the transcriptome datasets of Shao and Kingsford (TCBB, 2017) show that all safe paths for minimum flow decompositions correctly recover up to 90% of the full RNA transcripts, which is at least 25% more than previously known safe paths, such as (Caceres et al. TCBB, 2021), (Zheng et al., RECOMB 2021), (Khan et al., RECOMB 2022, ESA 2022). Moreover, despite the NP-hardness of the problem, we can report all safe paths for 99.8% of the over 27,000 non-trivial graphs of this dataset in only 1.5 hours. Our results suggest that, on perfect data, there is less ambiguity than thought in the notoriously hard RNA assembly problem. Availability: https://github.com/algbio/mfd-safety

Minimum flow decomposition (MFD) -- the problem of finding a minimum set of weighted source-to-sink paths that perfectly decomposes a flow -- is a classical problem in Computer Science, and variants of it are powerful models in different fields such as Bioinformatics and Transportation. Even on acyclic graphs, the problem is NP-hard, and most practical solutions have been via heuristics or approximations. While there is an extensive body of research on acyclic graphs, currently, there is no \emph{exact} solution on graphs with cycles. In this paper, we present the first ILP formulation for three natural variants of the MFD problem in graphs with cycles, asking for a decomposition consisting only of weighted source-to-sink paths or cycles, trails, and walks, respectively. On three datasets of increasing levels of complexity from both Bioinformatics and Transportation, our approaches solve any instance in under 10 minutes. Our implementations are freely available at github.com/algbio/MFD-ILP.

Minimum flow decomposition (MFD) (the problem of finding a minimum set of paths that perfectly decomposes a flow) is a classical problem in Computer Science, and variants of it are powerful models in multiassembly problems in Bioinformatics (e.g. RNA assembly). However, because this problem and its variants are NP-hard, practical multiassembly tools either use heuristics or solve simpler, polynomial-time solvable versions of the problem, which may yield solutions that are not mini-mal or do not perfectly decompose the flow. Many RNA assemblers also use integer linear programming(ILP) formulations of such practical variants, having the major limitation they need to encode all the potentially exponentially many solution paths. Moreover, the only exact solver for MFD does not scale to large instances and cannot be efficiently generalized to practical MFD variants. In this work, we provide the first practical ILP formulation for MFD (and thus the first fast and exact solver for MFD), based on encoding all of the exponentially many solution paths using only a quadratic number of variables. On both simulated and real flow graphs, our approach solves any instance in under 13 seconds. We also show that our ILP formulation can be easily and efficiently adapted for many practical variants, such as incorporating longer or paired-end reads or minimizing flow errors. We hope that our results can remove the current tradeoff between the complexity of a multi assembly model and its tractability and can lie at the core of future practical RNA assembly tools.