arXiv++ Combinatorics

In the parameterized $k$-clique problem, or $k$-Clique for short, we are given a graph $G$ and a parameter $k\ge 1$. The goal is to decide whether there exist $k$ vertices in $G$ that induce a complete subgraph (i.e., a $k$-clique). This problem plays a central role in the theory of parameterized intractability as one of the first W[1]-complete problems. Existing research has shown that even an FPT-approximation algorithm for $k$-Clique with arbitrary ratio does not exist, assuming the Gap-Exponential-Time Hypothesis (Gap-ETH) [Chalermsook et al., FOCS'17 and SICOMP]. However, whether this inapproximability result can be based on the standard assumption of $\mathrm{W} 1\ne \mathrm{FPT}$ remains unclear. The recent breakthrough of Bingkai Lin [STOC'21] and subsequent works by Karthik C.S. and Khot [CCC'22], and by Lin, Ren, Sun Wang [ICALP'22] give a technique that bypasses Gap-ETH, thus leading to the inapproximability ratio of $O(1)$ and $k^{o(1)}$ under $\mathrm{W}[1]$-hardness (the first two) and ETH (for the latter one). All the work along this line follows the framework developed by Lin, which starts from the $k$-vector-sum problem and requires some involved algebraic techniques. This paper presents an alternative framework for proving the W[1]-hardness of the $k^{o(1)}$-FPT-inapproximability of $k$-Clique. Using this framework, we obtain a gap-producing self-reduction of $k$-Clique without any intermediate algebraic problem. More precisely, we reduce from $(k,k-1)$-Gap Clique to $(q^k, q^{k-1})$-Gap Clique, for any function $q$ depending only on the parameter $k$, thus implying the $k^{o(1)}$-inapproximability result when $q$ is sufficiently large. Our proof is relatively simple and mostly combinatorial. At the core of our construction is a novel encoding of $k$-element subset stemming from the theory of "network coding" and a "Sidon set" representation of a graph.

In the classical survivable network design problem (SNDP), we are given an undirected graph $G=(V,E)$ with costs on edges and a connectivity requirement $k(s,t)$ for each pair of vertices. The goal is to find a minimum-cost subgraph $H\subseteq V$ such that every pair $(s,t)$ are connected by $k(s,t)$ edge or (openly) vertex disjoint paths, abbreviated as EC-SNDP and VC-SNDP, respectively. The seminal result of Jain [FOCS'98, Combinatorica'01] gives a $2$-approximation algorithm for EC-SNDP, and a decade later, an $O(k^3\log n)$-approximation algorithm for VC-SNDP, where $k$ is the largest connectivity requirement, was discovered by Chuzhoy and Khanna [FOCS'09, Theory Comput.'12]. While there is rich literature on point-to-point settings of SNDP, the viable case of connectivity between subsets is still relatively poorly understood. This paper concerns the generalization of SNDP into the subset-to-subset setting, namely Group EC-SNDP. We develop the framework, which yields the first non-trivial (true) approximation algorithm for Group EC-SNDP. Previously, only a bicriteria approximation algorithm is known for Group EC-SNDP [Chalermsook, Grandoni, and Laekhanukit, SODA'15], and a true approximation algorithm is known only for the single-source variant with connectivity requirement $k(S,T)\in\{0,1,2\}$ [Gupta, Krishnaswamy, and Ravi, SODA'10; Khandekar, Kortsarz, and Nutov, FSTTCS'09 and Theor. Comput. Sci.'12].

Graph product is a fundamental tool with rich applications in both graph theory and theoretical computer science. It is usually studied in the form $f(G*H)$ where $G$ and $H$ are graphs, * is a graph product and $f$ is a graph property. For example, if $f$ is the independence number and * is the disjunctive product, then the product is known to be multiplicative: $f(G*H)=f(G)f(H)$. In this paper, we study graph products in the following non-standard form: $f((G\oplus H)*J)$ where $G$, $H$ and $J$ are graphs, $\oplus$ and * are two different graph products and $f$ is a graph property. We show that if $f$ is the induced and semi-induced matching number, then for some products $\oplus$ and *, it is subadditive in the sense that $f((G\oplus H)*J)\leq f(G*J)+f(H*J)$. Moreover, when $f$ is the poset dimension number, it is almost subadditive. As applications of this result (we only need $J=K_2$ here), we obtain tight hardness of approximation for various problems in discrete mathematics and computer science: bipartite induced and semi-induced matching (a.k.a. maximum expanding sequences), poset dimension, maximum feasible subsystem with 0/1 coefficients, unit-demand min-buying and single-minded pricing, donation center location, boxicity, cubicity, threshold dimension and independent packing.

In the k-arc connected subgraph problem, we are given a directed graph G and an integer k and the goal is the find a subgraph of minimum cost such that there are at least k-arc disjoint paths between any pair of vertices. We give a simple (1 + 1/k)-approximation to the unweighted variant of the problem, where all arcs of G have the same cost. This improves on the 1 + 2/k approximation of Gabow et al. [GGTW09]. Similar to the 2-approximation algorithm for this problem [FJ81], our algorithm simply takes the union of a k in-arborescence and a k out-arborescence. The main difference is in the selection of the two arborescences. Here, inspired by the recent applications of the rounding by sampling method (see e.g. [AGM+ 10, MOS11, OSS11, AKS12]), we select the arborescences randomly by sampling from a distribution on unions of k arborescences that is defined based on an extreme point solution of the linear programming relaxation of the problem. In the analysis, we crucially utilize the sparsity property of the extreme point solution to upper-bound the size of the union of the sampled arborescences. To complement the algorithm, we also show that the integrality gap of the minimum cost strongly connected subgraph problem (i.e., when k = 1) is at least 3/2 - c, for any c > 0. Our integrality gap instance is inspired by the integrality gap example of the asymmetric traveling salesman problem [CGK06], hence providing further evidence of connections between the approximability of the two problems.