arXiv++ Combinatorics

This paper considers the \textit{Zarankiewicz problem} in graphs with low-dimensional geometric representation (i.e., low Ferrers dimension). Our first result reveals a separation between bipartite graphs of Ferrers dimension three and four: while $Z(n;k) \leq 9n(k-1)$ for graphs of Ferrers dimension three, $Z(n;k) \in Ω\left(n k \cdot \frac{\log n}{\log \log n}\right)$ for Ferrers dimension four graphs (Chan & Har-Peled, 2023) (Chazelle, 1990). To complement this, we derive a tight upper bound of $2n(k-1)$ for chordal bigraphs and $54n(k-1)$ for grid intersection graphs (GIG), a prominent graph class residing in four Ferrers dimensions and capturing planar bipartite graphs as well as bipartite intersection graphs of rectangles. Previously, the best-known bound for GIG was $Z(n;k) \in O(2^{O(k)} n)$, implied by the results of Fox & Pach (2006) and Mustafa & Pach (2016). Our results advance and offer new insights into the interplay between Ferrers dimensions and extremal combinatorics.

Ferrer dimension, along with the order dimension, is a standard dimensional concept for bipartite graphs. In this paper, we prove that a graph is of Ferrer dimension three (equivalent to the intersection bigraph of orthants and points in ${\mathbb R}^3$) if and only if it admits a biadjacency matrix representation that does not contain $Γ= \begin{bmatrix} * & 1 & * \\ 1 & 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 1 & * \end{bmatrix}$ and $Δ= \begin{bmatrix} 1 & * & * \\ 0 & 1 & * \\ 1 & 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix}$, where $*$ denotes zero or one entry.

We consider the problem of comparison-sorting an $n$-permutation $S$ that avoids some $k$-permutation $π$. Chalermsook, Goswami, Kozma, Mehlhorn, and Saranurak prove that when $S$ is sorted by inserting the elements into the GreedyFuture binary search tree, the running time is linear in the extremal function $\mathrm{Ex}(P_π\otimes \text{hat},n)$. This is the maximum number of 1s in an $n\times n$ 0-1 matrix avoiding $P_π\otimes \text{hat}$, where $P_π$ is the $k\times k$ permutation matrix of $π$, $\otimes$ the Kronecker product, and $\text{hat} = \left(\begin{array}{ccc}&\bullet&\\\bullet&&\bullet\end{array}\right)$. The same time bound can be achieved by sorting $S$ with Kozma and Saranurak's SmoothHeap. In this paper we give nearly tight upper and lower bounds on the density of $P_π\otimes\text{hat}$-free matrices in terms of the inverse-Ackermann function $α(n)$. \[ \mathrm{Ex}(P_π\otimes \text{hat},n) = \left\{\begin{array}{ll} Ω(n\cdot 2^{α(n)}), & \mbox{for most $π$,}\\ O(n\cdot 2^{O(k^2)+(1+o(1))α(n)}), & \mbox{for all $π$.} \end{array}\right. \] As a consequence, sorting $π$-free sequences can be performed in $O(n2^{(1+o(1))α(n)})$ time. For many corollaries of the dynamic optimality conjecture, the best analysis uses forbidden 0-1 matrix theory. Our analysis may be useful in analyzing other classes of access sequences on binary search trees.

In 1960, Asplund and Grünbaum proved that every intersection graph of axis-parallel rectangles in the plane admits an $O(ω^2)$-coloring, where $ω$ is the maximum size of a clique. We present the first asymptotic improvement over this six-decade-old bound, proving that every such graph is $O(ω\logω)$-colorable and presenting a polynomial-time algorithm that finds such a coloring. This improvement leads to a polynomial-time $O(\log\log n)$-approximation algorithm for the maximum weight independent set problem in axis-parallel rectangles, which improves on the previous approximation ratio of $O(\frac{\log n}{\log\log n})$.

In this paper, we study a primal and dual relationship about triangles: For any graph $G$, let $ν(G)$ be the maximum number of edge-disjoint triangles in $G$, and $τ(G)$ be the minimum subset $F$ of edges such that $G \setminus F$ is triangle-free. It is easy to see that $ν(G) \leq τ(G) \leq 3 ν(G)$, and in fact, this rather obvious inequality holds for a much more general primal-dual relation between $k$-hyper matching and covering in hypergraphs. Tuza conjectured in $1981$ that $τ(G) \leq 2 ν(G)$, and this question has received attention from various groups of researchers in discrete mathematics, settling various special cases such as planar graphs and generalized to bounded maximum average degree graphs, some cases of minor-free graphs, and very dense graphs. Despite these efforts, the conjecture in general graphs has remained wide open for almost four decades. In this paper, we provide a proof of a non-trivial consequence of the conjecture; that is, for every $k \geq 2$, there exist a (multi)-set $F \subseteq E(G): |F| \leq 2k ν(G)$ such that each triangle in $G$ overlaps at least $k$ elements in $F$. Our result can be seen as a strengthened statement of Krivelevich's result on the fractional version of Tuza's conjecture (and we give some examples illustrating this.) The main technical ingredient of our result is a charging argument, that locally identifies edges in $F$ based on a local view of the packing solution. This idea might be useful in further studying the primal-dual relations in general and the Tuza's conjecture in particular.

A cactus graph is a graph in which any two cycles are edge-disjoint. We present a constructive proof of the fact that any plane graph $G$ contains a cactus subgraph $C$ where $C$ contains at least a $\frac{1}{6}$ fraction of the triangular faces of $G$. We also show that this ratio cannot be improved by showing a tight lower bound. Together with an algorithm for linear matroid parity, our bound implies two approximation algorithms for computing "dense planar structures" inside any graph: (i) A $\frac{1}{6}$ approximation algorithm for, given any graph $G$, finding a planar subgraph with a maximum number of triangular faces; this improves upon the previous $\frac{1}{11}$-approximation; (ii) An alternate (and arguably more illustrative) proof of the $\frac{4}{9}$ approximation algorithm for finding a planar subgraph with a maximum number of edges. Our bound is obtained by analyzing a natural local search strategy and heavily exploiting the exchange arguments. Therefore, this suggests the power of local search in handling problems of this kind.

The dynamic optimality conjecture is perhaps the most fundamental open question about binary search trees (BST). It postulates the existence of an asymptotically optimal online BST, i.e. one that is constant factor competitive with any BST on any input access sequence. The two main candidates for dynamic optimality in the literature are splay trees [Sleator and Tarjan, 1985], and Greedy [Lucas, 1988; Munro, 2000; Demaine et al. 2009] [..] Dynamic optimality is trivial for almost all sequences: the optimum access cost of most length-n sequences is Theta(n log n), achievable by any balanced BST. Thus, the obvious missing step towards the conjecture is an understanding of the "easy" access sequences. [..] The difficulty of proving dynamic optimality is witnessed by highly restricted special cases that remain unresolved; one prominent example is the traversal conjecture [Sleator and Tarjan, 1985], which states that preorder sequences (whose optimum is linear) are linear-time accessed by splay trees; no online BST is known to satisfy this conjecture. In this paper, we prove two different relaxations of the traversal conjecture for Greedy: (i) Greedy is almost linear for preorder traversal, (ii) if a linear-time preprocessing is allowed, Greedy is in fact linear. These statements are corollaries of our more general results that express the complexity of access sequences in terms of a pattern avoidance parameter k. [..] To our knowledge, these are the first upper bounds for Greedy that are not known to hold for any other online BST. To obtain these results we identify an input-revealing property of Greedy. Informally, this means that the execution log partially reveals the structure of the access sequence. This property facilitates the use of rich technical tools from forbidden submatrix theory. [Abridged]

In this paper we extend the geometric binary search tree (BST) model of Demaine, Harmon, Iacono, Kane, and Patrascu (DHIKP) to accommodate for insertions and deletions. Within this extended model, we study the online Greedy BST algorithm introduced by DHIKP. Greedy BST is known to be equivalent to a maximally greedy (but inherently offline) algorithm introduced independently by Lucas in 1988 and Munro in 2000, conjectured to be dynamically optimal. With the application of forbidden-submatrix theory, we prove a quasilinear upper bound on the performance of Greedy BST on deque sequences. It has been conjectured (Tarjan, 1985) that splay trees (Sleator and Tarjan, 1983) can serve such sequences in linear time. Currently neither splay trees, nor other general-purpose BST algorithms are known to fulfill this requirement. As a special case, we show that Greedy BST can serve output-restricted deque sequences in linear time. A similar result is known for splay trees (Tarjan, 1985; Elmasry, 2004). As a further application of the insert-delete model, we give a simple proof that, given a set U of permutations of [n], the access cost of any BST algorithm is Omega(log |U| + n) on "most" of the permutations from U. In particular, this implies that the access cost for a random permutation of [n] is Omega(n log n) with high probability. Besides the splay tree noted before, Greedy BST has recently emerged as a plausible candidate for dynamic optimality. Compared to splay trees, much less effort has gone into analyzing Greedy BST. Our work is intended as a step towards a full understanding of Greedy BST, and we remark that forbidden-submatrix arguments seem particularly well suited for carrying out this program.

Splay trees (Sleator and Tarjan) satisfy the so-called access lemma. Many of the nice properties of splay trees follow from it. What makes self-adjusting binary search trees (BSTs) satisfy the access lemma? After each access, self-adjusting BSTs replace the search path by a tree on the same set of nodes (the after-tree). We identify two simple combinatorial properties of the search path and the after-tree that imply the access lemma. Our main result (i) implies the access lemma for all minimally self-adjusting BST algorithms for which it was known to hold: splay trees and their generalization to the class of local algorithms (Subramanian, Georgakopoulos and Mc-Clurkin), as well as Greedy BST, introduced by Demaine et al. and shown to satisfy the access lemma by Fox, (ii) implies that BST algorithms based on "strict" depth-halving satisfy the access lemma, addressing an open question that was raised several times since 1985, and (iii) yields an extremely short proof for the O(log n log log n) amortized access cost for the path-balance heuristic (proposed by Sleator), matching the best known bound (Balasubramanian and Raman) to a lower-order factor. One of our combinatorial properties is locality. We show that any BST-algorithm that satisfies the access lemma via the sum-of-log (SOL) potential is necessarily local. The other property states that the sum of the number of leaves of the after-tree plus the number of side alternations in the search path must be at least a constant fraction of the length of the search path. We show that a weak form of this property is necessary for sequential access to be linear.

Graph product is a fundamental tool with rich applications in both graph theory and theoretical computer science. It is usually studied in the form $f(G*H)$ where $G$ and $H$ are graphs, * is a graph product and $f$ is a graph property. For example, if $f$ is the independence number and * is the disjunctive product, then the product is known to be multiplicative: $f(G*H)=f(G)f(H)$. In this paper, we study graph products in the following non-standard form: $f((G\oplus H)*J)$ where $G$, $H$ and $J$ are graphs, $\oplus$ and * are two different graph products and $f$ is a graph property. We show that if $f$ is the induced and semi-induced matching number, then for some products $\oplus$ and *, it is subadditive in the sense that $f((G\oplus H)*J)\leq f(G*J)+f(H*J)$. Moreover, when $f$ is the poset dimension number, it is almost subadditive. As applications of this result (we only need $J=K_2$ here), we obtain tight hardness of approximation for various problems in discrete mathematics and computer science: bipartite induced and semi-induced matching (a.k.a. maximum expanding sequences), poset dimension, maximum feasible subsystem with 0/1 coefficients, unit-demand min-buying and single-minded pricing, donation center location, boxicity, cubicity, threshold dimension and independent packing.