arXiv++ Combinatorics

The cooling number measures the speed at which a slow-moving influence or contagion spreads on a graph. In this paper, we investigate the cooling number of four classical graph products: the Cartesian product, the strong product, the lexicographic product, and the direct product. We also determine the cooling number of a disconnected graph in terms of the cooling numbers of its components. We conclude with open problems.

Lazy burning is a recently introduced variation of burning where only one set of vertices is chosen to burn in the first round. In hypergraphs, lazy burning spreads when all but one vertex in a hyperedge is burned. The lazy burning number is the minimum number of initially burned vertices that eventually burns all vertices. We give several equivalent characterizations of lazy burning on hypergraphs using matchings and zero forcing, and then apply these to give new bounds and complexity results. We prove that the lazy burning number of a hypergraph $H$ equals its order minus the maximum cardinality of a certain matching on its incidence graph. Using this characterization, we give a formula for the lazy burning number of a dual hypergraph and give new bounds on the lazy burning number based on various hypergraph parameters. We show that the lazy burning number of a hypergraph may be characterized by a maximal subhypergraph that results from iteratively deleting vertices in singleton hyperedges. We prove that lazy burning on a hypergraph is equivalent to zero forcing on its incidence graph and show an equivalence between skew zero forcing on a graph and lazy burning on its neighborhood hypergraph. As a result, we show that finding an upper bound on the lazy burning number of a hypergraph is NP-complete, which resolves a conjecture from \cite{BJR}. By applying lazy burning, we show that computing an upper bound on the skew zero forcing number for bipartite graphs is NP-complete. We finish with open problems.

We investigate the lazy burning process for Latin squares by studying their associated hypergraphs. In lazy burning, a set of vertices in a hypergraph is initially burned, and that burning spreads to neighboring vertices over time via a specified propagation rule. The lazy burning number is the minimum number of initially burned vertices that eventually burns all vertices. The hypergraphs associated with Latin squares include the $n$-uniform hypergraph, whose vertices and hyperedges correspond to the entries and lines (that is, sets of rows, columns, or symbols) of the Latin square, respectively, and the $3$-uniform hypergraph, which has vertices corresponding to the lines of the Latin square and hyperedges induced by its entries. Using sequences of vertices that together form a vertex cover, we show that for a Latin square of order $n$, the lazy burning number of its $n$-uniform hypergraph is bounded below by $n^2-3n+3$ and above by $n^2-3n+2 + \lfloor \log_2 n \rfloor.$ These bounds are shown to be tight using cyclic Latin squares and powers of intercalates. For the $3$-uniform hypergraph case, we show that the lazy burning number of Latin squares is one plus its shortest connected chain of subsquares. We determine the lazy burning number of Latin square hypergraphs derived from finitely generated groups. We finish with open problems.