arXiv++ Combinatorics

We study the performance of sequential contention resolution and matching algorithms on random graphs with vanishing edge probabilities. When the edges of the graph are processed in an adversarially-chosen order, we derive a new OCRS that is $0.382$-selectable, attaining the "independence benchmark" from the literature under the vanishing edge probabilities assumption. Complementary to this positive result, we show that no OCRS can be more than $0.390$-selectable, significantly improving upon the upper bound of $0.428$ from the literature. We also derive negative results that are specialized to bipartite graphs or subfamilies of OCRS's. Meanwhile, when the edges of the graph are processed in a uniformly random order, we show that the simple greedy contention resolution scheme which accepts all active and feasible edges is $1/2$-selectable. This result is tight due to a known upper bound. Finally, when the algorithm can choose the processing order, we show that a slight tweak to the random order -- give each vertex a random priority and process edges in lexicographic order -- results in a strictly better contention resolution scheme that is $1-\ln(2-1/e)\approx0.510$-selectable. Our positive results also apply to online matching on $1$-uniform random graphs with vanishing (non-identical) edge probabilities, extending and unifying some results from the random graphs literature.

The semi-random graph process is an adaptive random graph process in which an online algorithm is initially presented an empty graph on $n$ vertices. In each round, a vertex $u$ is presented to the algorithm independently and uniformly at random. The algorithm then adaptively selects a vertex $v$, and adds the edge $uv$ to the graph. For a given graph property, the objective of the algorithm is to force the graph to satisfy this property asymptotically almost surely in as few rounds as possible. We focus on the property of Hamiltonicity. We present an adaptive strategy which creates a Hamiltonian cycle in $αn$ rounds, where $α< 1.81696$ is derived from the solution to a system of differential equations. We also show that achieving Hamiltonicity requires at least $βn$ rounds, where $β> 1.26575$.

We introduce a new approach for designing Random-order Contention Resolution Schemes (RCRS) via exact solution in continuous time. Given a function $c(y):[0,1] \rightarrow [0,1]$, we show how to select each element which arrives at time $y \in [0,1]$ with probability exactly $c(y)$. We provide a rigorous algorithmic framework for achieving this, which discretizes the time interval and also needs to sample its past execution to ensure these exact selection probabilities. We showcase our framework in the context of online contention resolution schemes for matching with random-order vertex arrivals. For bipartite graphs with two-sided arrivals, we design a $(1+e^{-2})/2 \approx 0.567$-selectable RCRS, which we also show to be tight. Next, we show that the presence of short odd-length cycles is the only barrier to attaining a (tight) $(1+e^{-2})/2$-selectable RCRS on general graphs. By generalizing our bipartite RCRS, we design an RCRS for graphs with odd-length girth $g$ which is $(1+e^{-2})/2$-selectable as $g \rightarrow \infty$. This convergence happens very rapidly: for triangle-free graphs (i.e., $g \ge 5$), we attain a $121/240 + 7/16 e^2 \approx 0.563$-selectable RCRS. Finally, for general graphs we improve on the $8/15 \approx 0.533$-selectable RCRS of Fu et al. (ICALP, 2021) and design an RCRS which is at least $0.535$-selectable. Due to the reduction of Ezra et al. (EC, 2020), our bounds yield a $0.535$-competitive (respectively, $(1+e^{-2})/2$-competitive) algorithm for prophet secretary matching on general (respectively, bipartite) graphs under vertex arrivals.

We consider the classical online bipartite matching problem in the probe-commit model. In this problem, when an online vertex arrives, its edges must be probed to determine if they exist, based on known edge probabilities. A probing algorithm must respect commitment, meaning that if a probed edge exists, it must be used in the matching. Additionally, each online vertex has a patience constraint which limits the number of probes that can be made to an online vertex's adjacent edges. We introduce a new configuration linear program (LP) which we prove is a relaxation of an optimal offline probing algorithm. Using this LP, we establish the following competitive ratios which depend on the model used to generate the instance graph, and the arrival order of its online vertices: - In the worst-case instance model, an optimal $1/e$ ratio when the vertices arrive in uniformly at random (u.a.r.) order. - In the known independently distributed (i.d.) instance model, an optimal $1/2$ ratio when the vertices arrive in adversarial order, and a $1-1/e$ ratio when the vertices arrive in u.a.r. order. The latter two results improve upon the previous best competitive ratio of $0.46$ due to Brubach et al. (Algorithmica 2020), which only held in the more restricted known i.i.d. (independent and identically distributed) instance model. Our $1-1/e$-competitive algorithm matches the best known result for the prophet secretary matching problem due to Ehsani et al. (SODA 2018). Our algorithm is efficient and implies a $1-1/e$ approximation ratio for the special case when the graph is known. This is the offline stochastic matching problem, and we improve upon the $0.42$ approximation ratio for one-sided patience due to Pollner et al. (EC 2022), while also generalizing the $1-1/e$ approximation ratio for unbounded patience due to Gamlath et al. (SODA 2019).

In this note, we formulate a "one-sided" version of Wormald's differential equation method. In the standard "two-sided" method, one is given a family of random variables which evolve over time and which satisfy some conditions including a tight estimate of the expected change in each variable over one time step. These estimates for the expected one-step changes suggest that the variables ought to be close to the solution of a certain system of differential equations, and the standard method concludes that this is indeed the case. We give a result for the case where instead of a tight estimate for each variable's expected one-step change, we have only an upper bound. Our proof is very simple, and is flexible enough that if we instead assume tight estimates on the variables, then we recover the conclusion of the standard differential equation method.

Online Contention Resolution Schemes (OCRS's) represent a modern tool for selecting a subset of elements, subject to resource constraints, when the elements are presented to the algorithm sequentially. OCRS's have led to some of the best-known competitive ratio guarantees for online resource allocation problems, with the added benefit of treating different online decisions -- accept/reject, probing, pricing -- in a unified manner. This paper analyzes OCRS's for resource constraints defined by matchings in graphs, a fundamental structure in combinatorial optimization. We consider two dimensions of variants: the elements being presented in adversarial or random order; and the graph being bipartite or general. We improve the state of the art for all combinations of variants, both in terms of algorithmic guarantees and impossibility results. Some of our algorithmic guarantees are best-known even compared to Contention Resolution Schemes that can choose the order of arrival or are offline. All in all, our results for OCRS directly improve the best-known competitive ratios for online accept/reject, probing, and pricing problems on graphs in a unified manner.

The $\mathcal{D}$-process is a single player game in which the player is initially presented the empty graph on $n$ vertices. In each step, a subset of edges $X$ is independently sampled according to a distribution $\mathcal{D}$. The player then selects one edge $e$ from $X$, and adds $e$ to its current graph. For a fixed monotone increasing graph property $\mathcal{P}$, the objective of the player is to force the graph to satisfy $\mathcal{P}$ in as few steps as possible. Through appropriate choices of $\mathcal{D}$, the $\mathcal{D}$-process generalizes well-studied adaptive random graph processes, such as the Achlioptas process and the semi-random graph process We prove a sufficient condition for the existence of a sharp threshold for $\mathcal{P}$ in the $\mathcal{D}$-process. For the semi-random process, we use this condition to prove the existence of a sharp threshold when $\mathcal{P}$ corresponds to being Hamiltonian or to containing a perfect matching. These are the first results for the semi-random graph process which show the existence of a sharp threshold when $\mathcal{P}$ corresponds to containing a sparse spanning graph. Using a separate analytic argument, we show that each sharp threshold is of the form $C_{\mathcal{P}}n$ for some fixed constant $C_{\mathcal{P}}>0$. This answers two of the open problems proposed by Ben-Eliezer et al. (SODA 2020) in the affirmative. Unlike similar results which establish sharp thresholds for certain distributions and properties, we establish the existence of sharp thresholds without explicitly identifying asymptotically optimal strategies.

The semi-random graph process is a single player game in which the player is initially presented an empty graph on $n$ vertices. In each round, a vertex $u$ is presented to the player independently and uniformly at random. The player then adaptively selects a vertex $v$, and adds the edge $uv$ to the graph. For a fixed monotone graph property, the objective of the player is to force the graph to satisfy this property with high probability in as few rounds as possible. We focus on the problem of constructing a Hamiltonian cycle in as few rounds as possible. In particular, we present an adaptive strategy for the player which achieves it in $αn$ rounds, where $α< 2.01678$ is derived from the solution to some system of differential equations. We also show that the player cannot achieve the desired property in less than $βn$ rounds, where $β> 1.26575$. These results improve the previously best known bounds and, as a result, the gap between the upper and lower bounds is decreased from 1.39162 to 0.75102.

The semi-random graph process is a single player game in which the player is initially presented an empty graph on $n$ vertices. In each round, a vertex $u$ is presented to the player independently and uniformly at random. The player then adaptively selects a vertex $v$, and adds the edge $uv$ to the graph. For a fixed monotone graph property, the objective of the player is to force the graph to satisfy this property with high probability in as few rounds as possible. We focus on the problem of constructing a perfect matching in as few rounds as possible. In particular, we present an adaptive strategy for the player which achieves a perfect matching in $βn$ rounds, where the value of $β< 1.206$ is derived from a solution to some system of differential equations. This improves upon the previously best known upper bound of $(1+2/e+o(1)) \, n < 1.736 \, n$ rounds. We also improve the previously best lower bound of $(\ln 2 + o(1)) \, n > 0.693 \, n$ and show that the player cannot achieve the desired property in less than $αn$ rounds, where the value of $α> 0.932$ is derived from a solution to another system of differential equations. As a result, the gap between the upper and lower bounds is decreased roughly four times.

Motivated by the Beck-Fiala conjecture, we study the discrepancy problem in two related models of random hypergraphs on $n$ vertices and $m$ edges. In the first (edge-independent) model, a random hypergraph $H_1$ is constructed by fixing a parameter $p$ and allowing each of the $n$ vertices to join each of the $m$ edges independently with probability $p$. In the parameter range in which $pn \rightarrow \infty$ and $pm \rightarrow \infty$, we show that with high probability (w.h.p.) $H_1$ has discrepancy at least $Ω(2^{-n/m} \sqrt{pn})$ when $m = O(n)$, and at least $Ω(\sqrt{pn \logγ})$ when $m \gg n$, where $γ= \min\{ m/n, pn\}$. In the second (edge-dependent) model, $d$ is fixed and each vertex of $H_2$ independently joins exactly $d$ edges uniformly at random. We obtain analogous results for this model by generalizing the techniques used for the edge-independent model with $p=d/m$. Namely, for $d \rightarrow \infty$ and $dn/m \rightarrow \infty$, we prove that w.h.p. $H_{2}$ has discrepancy at least $Ω(2^{-n/m} \sqrt{dn/m})$ when $m = O(n)$, and at least $Ω(\sqrt{(dn/m) \logγ})$ when $m \gg n$, where $γ=\min\{m/n, dn/m\}$. Furthermore, we obtain nearly matching asymptotic upper bounds on the discrepancy in both models (when $p=d/m$), in the dense regime of $m \gg n$. Specifically, we apply the partial colouring lemma of Lovett and Meka to show that w.h.p. $H_{1}$ and $H_{2}$ each have discrepancy $O( \sqrt{dn/m} \log(m/n))$, provided $d \rightarrow \infty$, $d n/m \rightarrow \infty$ and $m \gg n$. This result is algorithmic, and together with the work of Bansal and Meka characterizes how the discrepancy of each random hypergraph model transitions from $Θ(\sqrt{d})$ to $o(\sqrt{d})$ as $m$ varies from $m=Θ(n)$ to $m \gg n$.

We consider the online stochastic matching problem for bipartite graphs where edges adjacent to an online node must be probed to determine if they exist, based on known edge probabilities. Our algorithms respect commitment, in that if a probed edge exists, it must be used in the matching. We study this matching problem subject to a downward-closed constraint on each online node's allowable edge probes. Our setting generalizes the commonly studied patience (or time-out) constraint which limits the number of probes that can be made to an online node's adjacent edges. We introduce a new LP that we prove is a relaxation of an optimal offline probing algorithm (the adaptive benchmark) and which overcomes the limitations of previous LP relaxations. (1) A tight $\frac{1}{2}$ ratio when the stochastic graph is generated from a known stochastic type graph where the $t^{th}$ online node is drawn independently from a known distribution $\scr{D}_{π(t)}$ and $π$ is chosen adversarially. We refer to this setting as the known i.d. stochastic matching problem with adversarial arrivals. (2) A $1-1/e$ ratio when the stochastic graph is generated from a known stochastic type graph where the $t^{th}$ online node is drawn independently from a known distribution $\scr{D}_{π(t)}$ and $π$ is a random permutation. We refer to this setting as the known i.d. stochastic matching problem with random order arrivals. Our results improve upon the previous best competitive ratio of $0.46$ in the known i.i.d. setting against the standard adaptive benchmark. Moreover, we are the first to study the prophet secretary matching problem in the context of probing, where we match the best known classical result.

Within the context of stochastic probing with commitment, we consider the online stochastic matching problem; that is, the one-sided online bipartite matching problem where edges adjacent to an online node must be probed to determine if they exist based on edge probabilities that become known when an online vertex arrives. If a probed edge exists, it must be used in the matching (if possible). We consider the competitiveness of online algorithms in both the adversarial order model (AOM) and the random order model (ROM). More specifically, we consider a bipartite stochastic graph $G = (U,V,E)$ where $U$ is the set of offline vertices, $V$ is the set of online vertices and $G$ has edge probabilities $(p_{e})_{e \in E}$ and edge weights $(w_{e})_{e \in E}$. Additionally, $G$ has probing constraints $(\scr{C}_{v})_{v \in V}$, where $\scr{C}_v$ indicates which sequences of edges adjacent to an online vertex $v$ can be probed. We assume that $U$ is known in advance, and that $\scr{C}_v$, together with the edge probabilities and weights adjacent to an online vertex are only revealed when the online vertex arrives. This model generalizes the various settings of the classical bipartite matching problem, and so our main contribution is in making progress towards understanding which classical results extend to the stochastic probing model.

The semi-random graph process is a single player game in which the player is initially presented an empty graph on $n$ vertices. In each round, a vertex $u$ is presented to the player independently and uniformly at random. The player then adaptively selects a vertex $v$, and adds the edge $uv$ to the graph. For a fixed monotone graph property, the objective of the player is to force the graph to satisfy this property with high probability in as few rounds as possible. We focus on the problem of constructing a Hamilton cycle in as few rounds as possible. In particular, we present a novel strategy for the player which achieves a Hamiltonian cycle in $(2+4e^{-2}+0.07+o(1)) \, n < 2.61135 \, n$ rounds, assuming that a specific non-convex optimization problem has a negative solution (a premise we numerically support). Assuming that this technical condition holds, this improves upon the previously best known upper bound of $3 \, n$ rounds. We also show that the previously best lower bound of $(\ln 2 + \ln (1+\ln 2) + o(1)) \, n$ is not tight.

We consider the localization game played on graphs in which a cop tries to determine the exact location of an invisible robber by exploiting distance probes. The corresponding graph parameter $ζ(G)$ for a given graph $G$ is called the localization number. In this paper, we improve the bounds for dense random graphs determining an asymptotic behaviour of $ζ(G)$. Moreover, we extend the argument to sparse graphs.

Zero forcing is a deterministic iterative graph coloring process in which vertices are colored either blue or white, and in every round, any blue vertices that have a single white neighbor force these white vertices to become blue. Here we study probabilistic zero forcing, where blue vertices have a non-zero probability of forcing each white neighbor to become blue. We explore the propagation time for probabilistic zero forcing on the Erdős-Réyni random graph $\Gnp$ when we start with a single vertex colored blue. We show that when $p=\log^{-o(1)}n$, then with high probability it takes $(1+o(1))\log_2\log_2n$ rounds for all the vertices in $\Gnp$ to become blue, and when $\log n/n\ll p\leq \log^{-O(1)}n$, then with high probability it takes $Θ(\log(1/p))$ rounds.

The zero forcing process is an iterative graph colouring process in which at each time step a coloured vertex with a single uncoloured neighbour can force this neighbour to become coloured. A zero forcing set of a graph is an initial set of coloured vertices that can eventually force the entire graph to be coloured. The zero forcing number is the size of the smallest zero forcing set. We explore the zero forcing number for random regular graphs, improving on bounds given by Kalinowski, Kamucev and Sudakov. We also propose and analyze a degree-greedy algorithm for finding small zero forcing sets using the differential equations method.