Papers by Cédric Bentz
3 paper(s) by this author
· All BibTeX
Antimagic labelling of graphs with maximum degree $Δ(G) = n - 4$
An antimagic labelling of a graph $G = (V,E)$ is a bijection from $E$ to $\{1,2, \ldots, |E|\}$, such that all vertex-sums are pairwise distinct, where the vertex-sum of each vertex is the sum of labels over edges incident to this vertex. A graph is said to be antimagic if it has an antimagic labelling. It has been proven that graphs $G$ with $Δ(G) \geq n - 3$ are antimagic, where $Δ(G)$ is the maximum degree of a vertex in $G$ and $n = |V|$. In this article, we extend this result to graphs with $Δ(G) = n - 4$, provided that $|E| \geq 7n$.
Antimagicness of graphs with a dominating clique
A graph $G = (V, E)$ is called antimagic if there exists a bijective labelling $f : E \rightarrow \{1, 2, \ldots, |E|\}$ such that the vertex-sums of labels over edges incident to a given vertex are all distinct. In this paper, we extend the antimagicness results over graphs with a dominating clique. We also introduce an alternative to the usual definition of antimagic graphs, called C-antimagic, allowing for the labelling to be injective in $\{1, 2, . . . , |E| + C\}$ instead of bijective, and show that almost all graphs with a dominating clique are 3-antimagic.
Antimagic labellings of (k, 2)-bipartite biregular graphs
An antimagic labelling of a graph is a bijection from the set of edges to $\{1, 2, \ldots , m\}$, such that all vertex-sums are pairwise distinct, where the vertex-sum of a vertex is the sum of labels on the edges incident to it. We say a graph is antimagic if it has an antimagic labelling. In 2023, it has been proven that connected $(k, l)$-bipartite graphs are antimagic if $k \geq l + 2$ and one of k or l is odd. In this paper, we extend this result to connected $(k, 2)$-bipartite biregular graphs for $k \geq 4$ even, and to $(k, 2)$-bipartite biregular graphs for $k \geq 3$ odd.