arXiv++ Combinatorics

An antimagic labelling of a graph $G = (V,E)$ is a bijection from $E$ to $\{1,2, \ldots, |E|\}$, such that all vertex-sums are pairwise distinct, where the vertex-sum of each vertex is the sum of labels over edges incident to this vertex. A graph is said to be antimagic if it has an antimagic labelling. It has been proven that graphs $G$ with $Δ(G) \geq n - 3$ are antimagic, where $Δ(G)$ is the maximum degree of a vertex in $G$ and $n = |V|$. In this article, we extend this result to graphs with $Δ(G) = n - 4$, provided that $|E| \geq 7n$.

A graph $G = (V, E)$ is called antimagic if there exists a bijective labelling $f : E \rightarrow \{1, 2, \ldots, |E|\}$ such that the vertex-sums of labels over edges incident to a given vertex are all distinct. In this paper, we extend the antimagicness results over graphs with a dominating clique. We also introduce an alternative to the usual definition of antimagic graphs, called C-antimagic, allowing for the labelling to be injective in $\{1, 2, . . . , |E| + C\}$ instead of bijective, and show that almost all graphs with a dominating clique are 3-antimagic.

An antimagic labelling of a graph is a bijection from the set of edges to $\{1, 2, \ldots , m\}$, such that all vertex-sums are pairwise distinct, where the vertex-sum of a vertex is the sum of labels on the edges incident to it. We say a graph is antimagic if it has an antimagic labelling. In 2023, it has been proven that connected $(k, l)$-bipartite graphs are antimagic if $k \geq l + 2$ and one of k or l is odd. In this paper, we extend this result to connected $(k, 2)$-bipartite biregular graphs for $k \geq 4$ even, and to $(k, 2)$-bipartite biregular graphs for $k \geq 3$ odd.

Given a 3-uniform hypergraph H, its 2-intersection graph G has for vertex set the hyperedges of H and ee' is an edge of G whenever e and e' have exactly two common vertices in H. Di Marco et al. prove that deciding wether a graph G is the 2-intersection graph of a 3-uniform hypergraph is NP-complete. The main problems we study concern the class of claw-free graphs. We show that the recognition problem remains NP-complete when G is claw-free graphs but becomes polynomial if in addition G is triangulated.

A set $S\subseteq V$ of a graph $G=(V,E)$ is a dominating set if each vertex has a neighbor in $S$ or belongs to $S$. Dominating Set is the problem of deciding, given a graph $G$ and an integer $k\geq 1$, if $G$ has a dominating set of size at most $k$. It is well known that this problem is $\mathsf{NP}$-complete even for claw-free graphs. We give a complexity dichotomy for Dominating Set for the class of claw-free graphs with diameter $d$. We show that the problem is $\mathsf{NP}$-complete for every fixed $d\ge 3$ and polynomial time solvable for $d\le 2$. To prove the case $d=2$, we show that Minimum Maximal Matching can be solved in polynomial time for $2K_2$-free graphs.

Perfect Matching-Cut is the problem of deciding whether a graph has a perfect matching that contains an edge-cut. We show that this problem is NP-complete for planar graphs with maximum degree four, for planar graphs with girth five, for bipartite five-regular graphs, for graphs of diameter three and for bipartite graphs of diameter four. We show that there exist polynomial time algorithms for the following classes of graphs: claw-free, $P_5$-free, diameter two, bipartite with diameter three and graphs with bounded tree-width.

We study the following problem: for given integers $d,k$ and graph $G$, can we obtain a graph with diameter $d$ via at most $k$ edge deletions ? We determine the computational complexity of this and related problems for different values of $d$.

Given a graph $G$ and a non trivial partition $(V_1,V_2)$ of its vertex-set, the satisfaction of a vertex $v\in V_i$ is the ratio between the size of it's closed neighborhood in $V_i$ and the size of its closed neighborhood in $G$. The worst ratio over all the vertices defines the quality of the partition. We define $q(G)$ the degree ratio of a graph as the maximum of the worst ratio over all the non trivial partitions. We give bounds and exact values of $q(G)$ for some classes of graphs. We also show some complexity results for the associated optimization or decision problems.

Given a graph $G=(V,E)$, $S\subseteq V$ is a dominating set if every $v\in V\setminus S$ is adjacent to an element of $S$. The Minimum Dominating Set problem asks for a dominating set with minimum cardinality. It is well known that its decision version is $NP$-complete even when $G$ is a claw-free graph. We give a complexity dichotomy for the Minimum Dominating Set problem for the class of $(claw, H)$-free graphs when $H$ has at most six vertices. In an intermediate step we show that the Minimum Dominating Set problem is $NP$-complete for cubic graphs.

We prove that the Minimum Dominating Set problem is polynomial for the class of (claw, P8)-free graphs.

For every $n\ge 3$ we determine the minimum number of edges of graph with $n$ vertices such that for any non edge $xy$ there exits a hamiltonian cycle containing $xy$.

We characterize the vertices belonging to all minimum dominating sets, to some minimum dominating sets but not all, and to no minimum dominating set. We refine this characterization for some well studied sub-classes of graphs: chordal, claw-free, triangle-free. Also we exhibit some graphs answering to some open questions of the literature on minimum dominating sets.

A graceful difference labeling (gdl for short) of a directed graph G with vertex set V is a bijection f between V and {1,...,|V|} such that, when each arc uv is assigned the difference label f(v)-f(u), the resulting arc labels are distinct. We conjecture that all disjoint unions of circuits have a gdl, except in two particular cases. We prove partial results which support this conjecture.

When a flow is not allowed to be reoriented the Maximum Residual Flow Problem with $k$-Arc Destruction is known to be $NP$-hard for $k=2$. We show that when a flow is allowed to be adaptive the problem becomes polynomial for every fixed $k$.

A vertex or edge in a graph is critical if its deletion reduces the chromatic number of the graph by 1. We consider the problems of deciding whether a graph has a critical vertex or edge, respectively. We give a complexity dichotomy for both problems restricted to $H$-free graphs, that is, graphs with no induced subgraph isomorphic to $H$. Moreover, we show that an edge is critical if and only if its contraction reduces the chromatic number by 1. Hence, we also obtain a complexity dichotomy for the problem of deciding if a graph has an edge whose contraction reduces the chromatic number by 1.

We study the following problem: for given integers $d$, $k$ and graph $G$, can we reduce some fixed graph parameter $π$ of $G$ by at least $d$ via at most $k$ graph operations from some fixed set $S$? As parameters we take the chromatic number $χ$, clique number $ω$ and independence number $α$, and as operations we choose the edge contraction ec and vertex deletion vd. We determine the complexity of this problem for $S=\{\mbox{ec}\}$ and $S=\{\mbox{vd}\}$ and $π\in \{χ,ω,α\}$ for a number of subclasses of perfect graphs. We use these results to determine the complexity of the problem for $S=\{\mbox{ec}\}$ and $S=\{\mbox{vd}\}$ and $π\in \{χ,ω,α\}$ restricted to $H$-free graphs.

The three-in-a-tree algorithm of Chudnovsky and Seymour decides in time $O(n^4)$ whether three given vertices of a graph belong to an induced tree. Here, we study four-in-a-tree for triangle-free graphs. We give a structural answer to the following question: what does a triangle-free graph look like if no induced tree covers four given vertices? Our main result says that any such graph must have the "same structure", in a sense to be defined precisely, as a square or a cube. We provide an $O(nm)$-time algorithm that given a triangle-free graph $G$ together with four vertices outputs either an induced tree that contains them or a partition of $V(G)$ certifying that no such tree exists. We prove that the problem of deciding whether there exists a tree $T$ covering the four vertices such that at most one vertex of $T$ has degree at least 3 is NP-complete.