arXiv++ Combinatorics

Baste et al. (2020) conjectured that every regular graph of positive degree has domination number at most its edge domination number, the least size of a maximal matching. Combining published bounds settles the inequality for every degree at least nine. A reduction proves the inequality whenever one endpoint of each edge of a minimum maximal matching can be chosen to form a dominating set, and the Lovász Local Lemma shows such a choice exists for every degree at least seven, newly closing degrees seven and eight and leaving degrees three through six open. The reduction settles each open degree up to a bounded number of vertices, forty-eight for cubic graphs. At fifty vertices, however, the reduction meets an explicit cubic graph it cannot settle, though the inequality holds there too. The inequality cannot be tightened, since infinitely many cubic graphs have equal domination and edge domination numbers. The cubic case stays open, and even linear arguments from the local structure cannot close it. The middle degrees stay open beyond the graphs already settled.

The flip graph of an origami crease pattern has the flat-foldable mountain-valley assignments as vertices, and an edge joins two of them that differ by a single face flip. A basic invariant of this graph is the degree sequence, which counts the vertices of each degree. On the $m\times n$ Miura-ori, this sequence is known as a bivariate polynomial only for small degrees, each count obtained by a separate argument whose casework grows with the degree. This paper gives one uniform construction that expresses, for every degree $d$, the number of degree-$d$ vertices as a single symmetric polynomial $p_d(m,n)$ for all sufficiently large $m,n$. Subject to a single degree bound, this polynomial has total degree $d-2$, growing for $d\ge5$ as an explicit multiple of $m^{d-2}+n^{d-2}$; the bound is proved here when the count splits into independent row and column factors, and open otherwise. The region is $m,n\ge\max(d-1,2)$; through $d=7$, the polynomials are computed in closed form and the bound is verified in every case. Below this region, the count departs from $p_d$ by a correction whose leading coefficient, through degree eleven, is $-4$ times a Baxter number. Each $p_d$ thus counts the Miura-ori's flat-foldable assignments admitting exactly $d$ single face flips.

Automated conjecturing programs scan collections of graphs for inequalities between invariants that no stored graph violates, then offer the survivors for proof or refutation. TxGraffiti, one such program, conjectured that every nontrivial connected graph $G$ satisfies $α(G) \ge \bigl(a(G) + R(G)\bigr)/Δ(G)$, where $α$ is the independence number, $a$ the annihilation number, $R$ the residue, and $Δ$ the maximum degree. Established only for two special families of graphs, the conjecture has otherwise remained open. The note proves the degree-sequence inequality $a \le \tfrac{Δ+1}{2}W$, where $W$ is the Caro-Wei sum; the same inequality is known for the independence number in place of $a$. Combined with the classical lower bounds $α\ge R$ and $α\ge W$, it proves the conjecture for every connected graph of maximum degree at least three, and a direct argument settles maximum degree two; the conjecture fails only for the single edge, of maximum degree one. The inequality also brackets the independence number between the polynomial-time quantities $R$ and $a$, within a factor $(Δ+1)/2$. The conjecture's bound is sharp, with equality attained, for instance, by the complete graph on four vertices.

The state space of an origami crease pattern forms a flip graph, whose vertices are the flat-foldable mountain-valley assignments and whose edges join assignments differing by a single face flip. For the $m \times n$ Miura-ori, the degree sequence and diameter of this graph are known only for two rows. Each assignment maps to an integer height function on the grid, under which a vertex's degree equals its number of local extrema. In this model the vertices of each degree up to five are counted by an explicit polynomial in $m$ and $n$, valid once both exceed a bound that grows with the degree, and the height functions realizing those degrees are described explicitly. A closed-form lower bound for the diameter holds for all $m$ and $n$, and the matching upper bound reduces to an extremal inequality for $1$-Lipschitz functions on the grid, recovering the two-row distance at $m=2$. Since each invariant is read from the extrema or height differences of a grid function, the same reduction applies to any flip-graph quantity expressible in those terms.

The saturation number $μ^*(G)$ of a graph $G$ is the minimum cardinality of a maximal matching, and $H(G)$ is its harmonic index. TxGraffiti conjectured in 2023 that $μ^*(G) \le H(G)$ for every nontrivial connected graph $G$, and Bıyıkoğlu refuted this by showing that the ratio $μ^*(G)/H(G)$ can be made arbitrarily large. Restricting to trees bounds the ratio sharply. Every nontrivial tree $T$ satisfies $μ^*(T) < \frac{3}{2} H(T)$, with the constant $3/2$ best possible. A complementary bound $H(G) < 4μ^*(G)$ holds for every graph with an edge, so on a nontrivial tree the saturation number is pinned to $\frac{1}{4} H(T) < μ^*(T) < \frac{3}{2} H(T)$, both constants best possible. The friendship graph $F_4$ is a smallest counterexample to the conjecture, on nine vertices, and the smallest tree counterexample is the subdivided star on eleven vertices. For each positive integer $m$ a family of graphs with $m$ hubs has ratio approaching $m+1$, while the conjecture holds whenever all vertices have equal degree. Both invariants arise in applications, the harmonic index as a molecular descriptor and the saturation number as a measure of adsorption inefficiency, and the bounds estimate the latter, which is NP-hard to compute, by the former, which is computable in linear time.