arXiv++ Combinatorics

Many natural optimization problems derived from $\sf NP$ admit bilevel and multilevel extensions in which decisions are made sequentially by multiple players with conflicting objectives, as in interdiction, adversarial selection, and adjustable robust optimization. Such problems are naturally modeled by alternating quantifiers and, therefore, lie beyond $\sf NP$, typically in the polynomial hierarchy or $\sf PSPACE$. Despite extensive study of these problem classes, relatively few natural completeness results are known at these higher levels. We introduce a general framework for proving completeness in the polynomial hierarchy and $\sf PSPACE$ for problems derived from $\sf NP$. Our approach is based on a refinement of $\sf NP$, which we call $\sf NP$ with solutions ($\sf NP$-$\sf S$), in which solutions are explicit combinatorial objects, together with a restricted class of reductions -- solution-embedding reductions -- that preserve solution structure. We define $\sf NP$-$\sf S$-completeness and show that a large collection of classical $\sf NP$-complete problems, including Clique, Vertex Cover, Knapsack, and Traveling Salesman, are $\sf NP$-$\sf S$-complete. Using this framework, we establish general meta-theorems showing that if a problem is $\sf NP$-$\sf S$-complete, then its natural two-level extensions are $Σ_2^p$-complete, its three-level extensions are $Σ_3^p$-complete, and its $k$-level extensions are $Σ_k^p$-complete. When the number of levels is unbounded, the resulting problems are $\sf PSPACE$-complete. Our results subsume nearly all previously known completeness results for multilevel optimization problems derived from $\sf NP$ and yield many new ones simultaneously, demonstrating that high computational complexity is a generic feature of multilevel extensions of $\sf NP$-complete problems.

We consider Stackelberg pricing games, which are also known as bilevel pricing problems, or combinatorial price-setting problems. This family of problems consists of games between two players: the leader and the follower. There is a market that is partitioned into two parts: the part of the leader and the part of the leader's competitors. The leader controls one part of the market and can freely set the prices for products. By contrast, the prices of the competitors' products are fixed and known in advance. The follower, then, needs to solve a combinatorial optimization problem in order to satisfy their own demands, while comparing the leader's offers to the offers of the competitors. Therefore, the leader has to hit the intricate balance of making an attractive offer to the follower, while at the same time ensuring that their own profit is maximized. Pferschy, Nicosia, Pacifici, and Schauer considered the Stackelberg pricing game where the follower solves a knapsack problem. They raised the question whether this problem is complete for the second level of the polynomial hierarchy, i.e., $Σ^p_2$-complete. The same conjecture was also made by Böhnlein, Schaudt, and Schauer. In this paper, we positively settle this conjecture. Moreover, we show that this result holds actually in a much broader context: The Stackelberg pricing game is $Σ^p_2$-complete for over 50 NP-complete problems, including most classics such as TSP, vertex cover, clique, subset sum, etc. This result falls in line of recent meta-theorems about higher complexity in the polynomial hierarchy by Grüne and Wulf.

In the well-known complexity class NP are combinatorial problems, whose optimization counterparts are important for many practical settings. These problems typically consider full knowledge about the input. In practical settings, however, uncertainty in the input data is a usual phenomenon, whereby this is normally not covered in optimization versions of NP problems. One concept to model the uncertainty in the input data, is recoverable robustness. The instance of the recoverable robust version of a combinatorial problem P is split into a base scenario $σ_0$ and an uncertainty scenario set $\textsf{S}$. The base scenario and all members of the uncertainty scenario set are instances of the original combinatorial problem P. The task is to calculate a solution $s_0$ for the base scenario $σ_0$ and solutions $s$ for all uncertainty scenarios $σ\in \textsf{S}$ such that $s_0$ and $s$ are not too far away from each other according to a distance measure, so $s_0$ can be easily adapted to $s$. This paper introduces Hamming Distance Recoverable Robustness, in which solutions $s_0$ and $s$ have to be calculated, such that $s_0$ and $s$ may only differ in at most $κ$ elements. We survey the complexity of Hamming distance recoverable robust versions of optimization problems, typically found in NP for different scenario encodings. The complexity is primarily situated in the lower levels of the polynomial hierarchy. The main contribution of the paper is a gadget reduction framework that shows that the recoverable robust versions of problems in a large class of combinatorial problems is $Σ^P_{3}$-complete. This class includes problems such as Vertex Cover, Coloring or Subset Sum. Additionally, we expand the results to $Σ^P_{2m+1}$-completeness for multi-stage recoverable robust problems with $m \in \mathbb{N}$ stages.