arXiv++ Combinatorics

For a graph $H$ and a family of graphs $\mathcal F$, let $\text{ex}(n,H,\mathcal F)$ denote the maximum number of copies of $H$ in an $\mathcal F$-free graph on $n$ vertices. For every integer $i\ge 3$, let $C_i$ denote the cycle of length $i$. For $r\ge 3$, set $\mathscr {C}_r=\{C_3,C_4,\ldots,C_r\},$ and set $\mathscr {C}_2=\varnothing$. In this paper, we prove that, for all integers $l>k\ge 2$, $$ \text{ex}(n,C_{2k+1},\mathscr {C}_{2k}\cup\{C_{2l+1}\}) =O_{k,l} \left(n^{2-\frac{1}{k(k+1)(l-k)}}\ \ \right). $$ Together with the known upper bounds for the number of triangles in $C_{2l+1}$-free graphs, this confirms a conjecture of Gerbner, Győri, Methuku, and Vizer.

For graphs $G$ and $H$, let $\mathbf N(G,H)$ denote the number of unlabeled, not necessarily induced copies of $H$ in $G$, and let $\mathbf{N}_{\mathcal P}(n,H)$ be the maximum of $\mathbf N(G,H)$ over all $n$-vertex planar graphs $G$. We prove that, for every fixed integer $m\geq 3$, \[ \mathbf{N}_{\mathcal P}(n,C_{2m+1}) =2m\left(\frac{n}{m}\right)^m +O_m\!\left(n^{m-1/5}\right). \] Heath, Martin, and Wells reduced the determination of the leading term to a weighted optimization conjecture involving cycles and paths. We prove a stronger sharp cycle--path inequality for probability weights on the edges of a complete graph and characterize equality in their conjectured inequality. Together with their reduction lemma, this settles the conjecture and yields the formula above, including the stated error term. The cases $m\geq 5$ are new; combined with the known results for $C_3$ and $C_5$, this determines the leading term for every fixed odd cycle in planar graphs.

For graphs \(G\) and \(H\), let \(N(G,H)\) be the number of unlabeled, not necessarily induced copies of \(H\) in \(G\), and let \(f(n,H)\) be the maximum of \(N(G,H)\) over all \(n\)-vertex planar graphs \(G\). Ghosh, Győri, Martin, Paulos, Salia, Xiao and Zamora conjectured that, for every fixed integer \(\ell\ge 2\), \[ f(n,P_{2\ell+1}) =4\ell\left(\frac{n}{\ell}\right)^{\ell+1}+O(n^\ell). \] We prove the conjecture, including the stated error term. Along the way, we also settle the Cox--Martin optimization conjecture.

Let \(G\) and \(H\) be graphs, and let \(G\times H\) denote their direct product. For a graph \(G\), let \(\operatorname{im}(G)\) be the largest integer \(t\) such that \(G\) contains a \(K_t\)-immersion. Collins, Heenehan, and McDonald conjectured that if \(\operatorname{im}(G)=t\) and \(\operatorname{im}(H)=r\), then \[\operatorname{im}(G\times H)\ge (t-1)(r-1)+1.\] We disprove this conjecture by constructing an infinite family of connected bipartite counterexamples.