arXiv++ Combinatorics

We construct a family of layer barriers for colour-biased tight Hamilton cycles in uniform hypergraphs. For every $k\ge 3$ and every $a\in\{0,\ldots,k-1\}$, we give a red--blue coloured $k$-graph that contains a tight Hamilton cycle, while every tight Hamilton cycle in the construction is perfectly colour-balanced. The construction underlying the higher-uniformity threshold conjectured by Behague, Clemen, Hyde and Morrison corresponds to the boundary case $a=0$ of this family. We show that interior choices of $a$ can yield strictly denser barriers. In particular, for $k=17$ and $a=8$, the asymptotic relative minimum vertex degree of our construction is \[ \frac{5761}{8192}\approx 0.703247, \] which exceeds the conjectured value $d_{17}\approx 0.699277$. This provides a counterexample to the proposed higher-uniformity threshold in Conjecture~6.1 of Behague, Clemen, Hyde and Morrison. Moreover, by choosing the layer appropriately as $k\to\infty$, the family contains barriers whose asymptotic relative minimum vertex degree is \[ 1-O\bigl(k^{-1/2}\bigr). \] Thus the interior members of the layer-barrier family exhibit substantially different behaviour from the previously considered boundary construction in large uniformity.

Let \(G\) and \(H\) be graphs, and let \(G\times H\) denote their direct product. For a graph \(G\), let \(\operatorname{im}(G)\) be the largest integer \(t\) such that \(G\) contains a \(K_t\)-immersion. Collins, Heenehan, and McDonald conjectured that if \(\operatorname{im}(G)=t\) and \(\operatorname{im}(H)=r\), then \[\operatorname{im}(G\times H)\ge (t-1)(r-1)+1.\] We disprove this conjecture by constructing an infinite family of connected bipartite counterexamples.

Recently, Chen and Deng have proved that every graph $G$ with independence number two contains $K_{\ell,χ(G)- \ell}$ as a minor for each integer $\ell$ with $1\leq\ell < χ(G)$. In this paper, we extend this result to odd minor version. That is, we prove that each graph $G$ with independence number two contains $K_{\ell,χ(G)- \ell}$ as an odd minor for each integer $\ell$ with $1\leq\ell < χ(G)$.

Hadwiger's conjecture for the immersion relation posits that every graph $G$ contains an immersion of the complete graph $K_{χ(G)}$. Vergara showed that this is equivalent to saying that every $n$-vertex graph $G$ with $α(G)=2$ contains an immersion of the complete graph on $\lceil\frac{n}{2}\rceil$ vertices. Recently, Botler et al. showed that every $n$-vertex graph $G$ with $α(G)=2$ contains every complete bipartite graph on $\lceil\frac{n}{2}\rceil$ vertices as an immersion. In this paper, we give a much simpler proof of this result.

A matching $M$ in a graph $G$ is {\em connected} if $G$ has an edge linking each pair of edges in $M$. The problem to find large connected matchings in graphs $G$ with $α(G)=2$ is closely related to Hadwiger's conjecture for graphs with independence number 2. The problem of finding a large connected matching in a general graph is NP-hard. F{ü}redi et al. in 2005 conjectured that each $(4t-1)$-vertex graph $G$ with $α(G)=2$ contains a connected matching of size at least $t$. Cambie recently showed that if this conjecture is false, then so is Hadwiger's conjecture. In this paper, we present a number of properties possessed by a counterexample to F{ü}redi et al.'s conjecture, and then using these properties, we prove that F{ü}redi et al.'s conjecture holds for $t\leq22$.

Woodall (and Seymour independently) in 2001 proposed a conjecture that every graph $G$ contains every complete bipartite graph on $χ(G)$ vertices as a minor, where $χ(G)$ is the chromatic number of $G$. In this paper, we prove that for each positive integer $\ell$ with $2\ell \leq χ(G)$, each graph $G$ with independence number two contains a $K^{\ell}_{\ell,χ(G)-\ell}$-minor, implying that Seymour and Woodall's conjecture holds for graphs with independence number two, where $K^{\ell}_{\ell,χ(G)-\ell}$ is the graph obtained from $K_{\ell,χ(G)-\ell}$ by making every pair of vertices on the side of the bipartition of size $\ell$ adjacent.