arXiv++ Combinatorics

It is well-known that any class of simple graphs, that is characterized by finitely many forbidden minors, also admits a characterization by finitely many forbidden topological minors; furthermore, the list of forbidden topological minors may be derived from the list of forbidden minors. We prove a similar result in Matching Theory. Our Main Theorem states that any class of matching covered graphs, that is characterized by finitely many forbidden $S$-minors that are cubic, also admits a characterization by finitely many forbidden conformal minors that are cubic as well; once again, the list of forbidden conformal minors may be derived from the list of forbidden $S$-minors. In order to establish the above, we first prove that every matching covered graph has one of two graphs as a conformal minor -- either $K_4$, or the $Θ$ graph (that is, two vertices joined by three edges). (In fact, we need and prove a much stronger statement.) This is reminiscent of a theorem due to Lovász: every nonbipartite matching covered graph has one of two graphs as a conformal minor -- either $K_4$, or the triangular prism $\overline{C_6}$. As applications of our Main Theorem, we deduce known 'forbidden conformal minor characterizations' of pfaffian near-bipartite graphs, and of pfaffian solid graphs, using their respective known 'forbidden $S$-minor characterizations'.

The number of perfect matchings of a $k$-pfaffian graph can be counted by computing a linear combination of the pfaffians of $k$ matrices. The pfaffian number of a graph $G$ is the smallest integer $k$ such that $G$ is $k$-pfaffian. We present the first known lower bounds for the pfaffian number of graphs. As an intermediate step, we prove an upper bound for the rank of two matrices related to their Khatri-Rao product, a result of independent relevance. One of the consequences of these results is the existence of graphs whose pfaffian numbers are arbitrarily large.

An edge cut $C$ of a graph $G$ is {\it tight} if $|C \cap M|=1$ for every perfect matching $M$ of $G$.~Barrier cuts and 2-separation cuts are called {\it ELP-cuts}, which are two important types of tight cuts in matching covered graphs.~Edmonds, Lovász and Pulleyblank proved that if a matching covered graph has a nontrivial tight cut, then it also has a nontrivial ELP-cut.~Carvalho, Lucchesi, and Murty made a stronger conjecture: given any nontrivial tight cut $C$ in a matching covered graph $G$, there exists a nontrivial ELP-cut $D$ in $G$ which does not cross $C$.~We confirm the conjecture in this paper.

Lovász (1987) proved that every matching covered graph $G$ may be uniquely decomposed into a list of bricks (nonbipartite) and braces (bipartite); we let $b(G)$ denote the number of bricks. An edge $e$ is removable if $G-e$ is also matching covered; furthermore, $e$ is $b$-invariant if $b(G-e)=1$, and $e$ is quasi-$b$-invariant if $b(G-e)=2$. (Each edge of the Petersen graph is quasi-$b$-invariant.) A brick $G$ is near-bipartite if it has a pair of edges $\{e,f\}$ so that $G-e-f$ is matching covered and bipartite; such a pair $\{e,f\}$ is a removable doubleton. (Each of $K_4$ and the triangular prism $\overline{C_6}$ has three removable doubletons.) Carvalho, Lucchesi and Murty (2002) proved a conjecture of Lovász which states that every brick, distinct from $K_4$, $\overline{C_6}$ and the Petersen graph, has a $b$-invariant edge. A cubic graph is essentially $4$-edge-connected if it is $2$-edge-connected and if its only $3$-cuts are the trivial ones; it is well-known that each such graph is either a brick or a brace; we provide a graph-theoretical proof of this fact. We prove that if $G$ is any essentially $4$-edge-connected cubic brick then its edge-set may be partitioned into three (possibly empty) sets: (i) edges that participate in a removable doubleton, (ii) $b$-invariant edges, and (iii) quasi-$b$-invariant edges; our Main Theorem states that if $G$ has two adjacent quasi-$b$-invariant edges, say $e_1$ and $e_2$, then either $G$ is the Petersen graph or the (near-bipartite) Cubeplex graph, or otherwise, each edge of $G$ (distinct from $e_1$ and $e_2$) is $b$-invariant. As a corollary, we deduce that each essentially $4$-edge-connected cubic non-near-bipartite brick $G$, distinct from the Petersen graph, has at least $|V(G)|$ $b$-invariant edges.

A cut $C:=\partial(X)$ of a matching covered graph $G$ is a separating cut if both its $C$-contractions $G/X$ and $G/\overline{X}$ are also matching covered. A brick is solid if it is free of nontrivial separating cuts. In 2004, we (Carvalho, Lucchesi and Murty) showed that the perfect matching polytope of a brick may be described without recourse to odd set constraints if and only if it is solid. In 2006, we proved that the only simple planar solid bricks are the odd wheels. The problem of characterizing nonplanar solid bricks remains unsolved. A bi-subdivision of a graph $J$ is a graph obtained from $J$ by replacing each of its edges by paths of odd length. A matching covered graph $J$ is a conformal minor of a matching covered graph $G$ if there exists a bi-subdivision $H$ of $J$ which is a subgraph of $G$ such that $G-V(H)$ has a perfect matching. For a fixed matching covered graph $J$, a matching covered graph $G$ is $J$-based if $J$ is a conformal minor of $G$ and, otherwise, $G$ is $J$-free. A basic result due to Lovász (1983) states that every nonbipartite matching covered graph is either $K_4$-based or is $\overline{C_6}$-based or both, where $\overline{C_6}$ is the triangular prism. In 2016, we (Kothari and Murty) showed that, for any cubic brick $J$, a matching covered graph $G$ is $J$-free if and only if each of its bricks is $J$-free. We also found characterizations of planar bricks which are $K_4$-free and those which are $\overline{C_6}$-free. Each of these problems remains unsolved in the nonplanar case. In this paper we show that the seemingly unrelated problems of characterizing nonplanar solid bricks and of characterizing nonplanar $\overline{C_6}$-free bricks are essentially the same. We do this by establishing that a simple nonplanar brick, other than the Petersen graph, is solid if and only if it is $\overline{C_6}$-free.