arXiv++ Combinatorics

For a divisor on $\overline{M}_{0,n}$, we introduce the polytope of its effective boundary expressions. We establish structural properties of these polytopes under the forgetful maps of $\overline{M}_{0,n}$ forgetting marked points, and give equivalent graph-theoretic descriptions. We compute these polytopes for several families of divisors. For psi-classes and their pullbacks by forgetful maps, we show that the polytopes are unimodular simplices. For the log-canonical class and its modifications by psi-classes, we prove that the nonnegative parts of the corresponding polytopes recover spanning forest polytopes and the subtour elimination (Held--Karp relaxation) polytope of the symmetric traveling salesman problem. As an application, we obtain a Minkowski-like decomposition of the subtour elimination polytope into simplices. Finally, for symmetric level-one $\mathfrak{sl}_p$ conformal block divisors, we show that the defining inequalities are local Turán bounds and the $0/1$-points are balanced Turán graphs. Moreover, for $p=2$ and $p=n/2$, these polytopes recover the perfect matching and fractional perfect matching polytopes.

We study the perfect matching lattice of a matching covered graph $G$, generated by the incidence vectors of its perfect matchings. Building on results of Lovász and de Carvalho, Lucchesi, and Murty, we give a polynomial-time algorithm based on polyhedral methods that constructs a lattice basis for this lattice consisting of perfect matchings of $G$. By decomposing along certain odd cuts, we reduce the graph into subgraphs whose perfect matching polytopes coincide with their bipartite relaxations (known as \emph{Birkhoff von Neumann graphs}). This yields a constructive polyhedral proof of the existence of such bases and highlights new connections between combinatorial and geometric properties of perfect matchings.

Let $G=(V,E)$ be a matching-covered graph, denote by $P$ its perfect matching polytope, and by $L$ the integer lattice generated by the integral points in $P$. In this paper, we give short, polyhedral proofs for two difficult results established by Lovász (1987), and by Carvalho, Lucchesi, and Murty (2002) in a series of three papers totaling over 120 pages. More specifically, we prove that $L$ has a lattice basis consisting solely of incidence vectors of some perfect matchings of $G$, $2x\in L$ for all $x\in \mathrm{lin}(P)\cap \mathbb{Z}^E$, and if $G$ has no Petersen brick then $L = \mathrm{lin}(P)\cap \mathbb{Z}^E$. Our proof avoids major technical aspects of the previous proofs, the most important of these being a characterization of the dual lattice, and a `Petersen-brick-sensitive' ear-decomposition result for matching-covered graphs. This is achieved by a novel study of the facial structure of the polytope $P$ and its relationship with the lattice $L$. Along the way, we give a new polyhedral characterization of the Petersen graph.

The Circuit diameter of polytopes was introduced by Borgwardt, Finhold and Hemmecke as a fundamental tool for the study of circuit augmentation schemes for linear programming and for estimating combinatorial diameters. Determining the complexity of computing the circuit diameter of polytopes was posed as an open problem by Sanità as well as by Kafer, and was recently reiterated by Borgwardt, Grewe, Kafer, Lee and Sanità. In this paper, we solve this problem by showing that computing the circuit diameter of a polytope given in halfspace-description is strongly NP-hard. To prove this result, we show that computing the combinatorial diameter of the perfect matching polytope of a bipartite graph is NP-hard. This complements a result by Sanità (FOCS 2018) on the NP-hardness of computing the diameter of fractional matching polytopes and implies the new result that computing the diameter of a $\{0,1\}$-polytope is strongly NP-hard, which may be of independent interest. In our second main result, we give a precise graph-theoretic description of the monotone diameter of perfect matching polytopes and use this description to prove that computing the monotone (circuit) diameter of a given input polytope is strongly NP-hard as well.

We consider the computational problem of finding short paths in the skeleton of the perfect matching polytope of a bipartite graph. We prove that unless $P=NP$, there is no polynomial-time algorithm that computes a path of constant length between two vertices at distance two of the perfect matching polytope of a bipartite graph. Conditioned on $P\neq NP$, this disproves a conjecture by Ito, Kakimura, Kamiyama, Kobayashi and Okamoto [SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics, 36(2), pp. 1102-1123 (2022)]. Assuming the Exponential Time Hypothesis we prove the stronger result that there exists no polynomial-time algorithm computing a path of length at most $\left(\frac{1}{4}-o(1)\right)\frac{\log N}{\log \log N}$ between two vertices at distance two of the perfect matching polytope of an $N$-vertex bipartite graph. These results remain true if the bipartite graph is restricted to be of maximum degree three. The above has the following interesting implication for the performance of pivot rules for the simplex algorithm on simply-structured combinatorial polytopes: If $P\neq NP$, then for every simplex pivot rule executable in polynomial time and every constant $k \in \mathbb{N}$ there exists a linear program on a perfect matching polytope and a starting vertex of the polytope such that the optimal solution can be reached in two monotone steps from the starting vertex, yet the pivot rule will require at least $k$ steps to reach the optimal solution. This result remains true in the more general setting of pivot rules for so-called circuit-augmentation algorithms.

A Bernoulli factory is an algorithmic procedure for exact sampling of certain random variables having only Bernoulli access to their parameters. Bernoulli access to a parameter $p \in [0,1]$ means the algorithm does not know $p$, but has sample access to independent draws of a Bernoulli random variable with mean equal to $p$. In this paper, we study the problem of Bernoulli factories for polytopes: given Bernoulli access to a vector $x\in P$ for a given polytope $P\subset [0,1]^n$, output a randomized vertex such that the expected value of the $i$-th coordinate is \emph{exactly} equal to $x_i$. For example, for the special case of the perfect matching polytope, one is given Bernoulli access to the entries of a doubly stochastic matrix $[x_{ij}]$ and asked to sample a matching such that the probability of each edge $(i,j)$ be present in the matching is exactly equal to $x_{ij}$. We show that a polytope $P$ admits a Bernoulli factory if and and only if $P$ is the intersection of $[0,1]^n$ with an affine subspace. Our construction is based on an algebraic formulation of the problem, involving identifying a family of Bernstein polynomials (one per vertex) that satisfy a certain algebraic identity on $P$. The main technical tool behind our construction is a connection between these polynomials and the geometry of zonotope tilings. We apply these results to construct an explicit factory for the perfect matching polytope. The resulting factory is deeply connected to the combinatorial enumeration of arborescences and may be of independent interest. For the $k$-uniform matroid polytope, we recover a sampling procedure known in statistics as Sampford sampling.

The notion of forcing sets for perfect matchings was introduced by Harary, Klein, and Živković. The application of this problem in chemistry, as well as its interesting theoretical aspects, made this subject very active. In this work, we introduce the notion of forcing function of fractional perfect matchings, which is continuous analogous to forcing sets defined over the perfect matching polytope of graphs. We show that this object is a continuous and concave function extension of the integral forcing set. Then, we use our results in the continuous world to conclude new bounds and results in the discrete case of forcing sets, for the family of regular edge-transitive graphs. In particular, we derive new upper bounds for the maximum forcing number of hypercube graphs.

The global forcing number of a graph G is the minimal cardinality of an edge subset discriminating all perfect matchings of G, denoted by gf(G). For any perfect matching M of G, the minimal cardinality of an edge subset S in E(G)-M such that G-S has a unique perfect matching is called the anti-forcing number of M,denoted by af(G, M). The maximum anti-forcing number of G among all perfect matchings is denoted by Af(G). It is known that the maximum anti-forcing number of a hexagonal system equals the famous Fries number. We are interested in some comparisons between the global forcing number and the maximum anti-forcing number of a graph. For a bipartite graph G, we show that gf(G)is larger than or equal to Af(G). Next we mainly extend such result to non-bipartite graphs, which is the set of all graphs with a perfect matching which contain no two disjoint odd cycles such that their deletion results in a subgraph with a perfect matching. For any such graph G, we also have gf(G) is larger than or equal to Af(G) by revealing further property of non-bipartite graphs with a unique perfect matching. As a consequence, this relation also holds for the graphs whose perfect matching polytopes consist of non-negative 1-regular vectors. In particular, for a brick G, de Carvalho, Lucchesi and Murty [4] showed that G satisfying the above condition if and only if G is solid, and if and only if its perfect matching polytope consists of non-negative 1-regular vectors. Finally, we obtain tight upper and lower bounds on gf(G)-Af(G). For a connected bipartite graph G with 2n vertices, we have that 0 \leq gf(G)-Af(G) \leq 1/2 (n-1)(n-2); For non-bipartite case, -1/2 (n^2-n-2) \leq gf(G)-Af(G) \leq (n-1)(n-2).

We illustrate the limitations of the hyperplane separation bound, a non-combinatorial lower bound on the extension complexity of a polytope. Most notably, this bounding technique is used by Rothvoß (J ACM 64.6:41, 2017) to establish an exponential lower bound for the perfect matching polytope. We point out that the technique is sensitive to the particular choice of slack matrix. For the canonical slack matrices of the spanning tree polytope and the completion time polytope, we show that the lower bounds produced by the hyperplane separation method are trivial. These bounds may, however, be strengthened by normalizing rows and columns of the slack matrices.

The perfect matching polytope, i.e. the convex hull of (incidence vectors of) perfect matchings of a graph is used in many combinatorial algorithms. Kotzig, Lovász and Plummer developed a decomposition theory for graphs with perfect matchings and their corresponding polytopes known as the tight cut decomposition which breaks down every graph into a number of indecomposable graphs, so called bricks. For many properties that are of interest on graphs with perfect matchings, including the description of the perfect matching polytope, it suffices to consider these bricks. A key result by Lovász on the tight cut decomposition is that the list of bricks obtained is the same independent of the choice of tight cuts made during the tight cut decomposition procedure. This implies that finding a tight cut decomposition is polynomial time equivalent to finding a single tight cut. We generalise the notions of a tight cut, a tight cut contraction and a tight cut decomposition to hypergraphs. By providing an example, we show that the outcome of the tight cut decomposition on general hypergraphs is no longer unique. However, we are able to prove that the uniqueness of the tight cut decomposition is preserved on a slight generalisation of uniform hypergraphs. Moreover, we show how the tight cut decomposition leads to a decomposition of the perfect matching polytope of uniformable hypergraphs and that the recognition problem for tight cuts in uniformable hypergraphs is polynomial time solvable.

A well-studied geometric object in combinatorial optimization is the perfect matching polytope of a graph $G$. In any investigation concerning the perfect matching polytope, one may assume that $G$ is matching covered --- that is, it is a connected graph (of order at least two) and each edge lies in some perfect matching. A graph $G$ is Birkhoff-von Neumann (BvN) if its perfect matching polytope is characterized solely by non-negativity and degree constraints. A result of Balas (1981) implies that $G$ is BvN if and only if $G$ does not contain a pair of vertex-disjoint odd cycles $(C_1,C_2)$ such that $G-V(C_1)-V(C_2)$ has a perfect matching. It follows immediately that the corresponding decision problem is in co-NP. However, it is not known to be in NP. The problem is in P if the input graph is planar --- due to a result of Carvalho, Lucchesi and Murty (2004). These authors, along with Kothari (2018), have shown that this problem is equivalent to the seemingly unrelated problem of deciding whether a given graph is $\overline{C_6}$-free. The combinatorial diameter of a polytope is the diameter of its $1$-skeleton graph. A graph $G$ is PM-compact (PMc) if the combinatorial diameter of its perfect matching polytope equals one. A result of Chvátal (1975) implies that $G$ is PMc if and only if $G$ does not contain a pair of vertex-disjoint even cycles $(C_1,C_2)$ such that $G-V(C_1)-V(C_2)$ has a perfect matching. Once again the corresponding decision problem is in co-NP, but it is not known to be in NP. The problem is in P if the input graph is bipartite or is near-bipartite --- due to a result of Wang, Lin, Carvalho, Lucchesi, Sanjith and Little (2013). In this paper, we consider the "intersection" of the aforementioned problems. We give a complete characterization of matching covered graphs that are BvN as well as PMc. (Thus the corresponding decision problem is in P.)

Is perfect matching in NC? That is, is there a deterministic fast parallel algorithm for it? This has been an outstanding open question in theoretical computer science for over three decades, ever since the discovery of RNC matching algorithms. Within this question, the case of planar graphs has remained an enigma: On the one hand, counting the number of perfect matchings is far harder than finding one (the former is #P-complete and the latter is in P), and on the other, for planar graphs, counting has long been known to be in NC whereas finding one has resisted a solution. In this paper, we give an NC algorithm for finding a perfect matching in a planar graph. Our algorithm uses the above-stated fact about counting matchings in a crucial way. Our main new idea is an NC algorithm for finding a face of the perfect matching polytope at which $Ω(n)$ new conditions, involving constraints of the polytope, are simultaneously satisfied. Several other ideas are also needed, such as finding a point in the interior of the minimum weight face of this polytope and finding a balanced tight odd set in NC.

Let $G$ be a graph with an even number of vertices. The matching preclusion number of $G$, denoted by $mp(G)$, is the minimum number of edges whose deletion leaves the resulting graph without a perfect matching. We introduced a $0$-$1$ linear programming which can be used to find matching preclusion number of graphs. In this paper, by relaxing of the $0$-$1$ linear programming we obtain a linear programming and call its optimal objective value as fractional matching preclusion number of graph $G$, denoted by $mp_f(G)$. We show $mp_f(G)$ can be computed in polynomial time for any graph $G$. By using perfect matching polytope, we transform it as a new linear programming whose optimal value equals the reciprocal of $mp_f(G)$. For bipartite graph $G$, we obtain an explicit formula for $mp_f(G)$ and show that $\lfloor mp_f(G) \rfloor$ is the maximum integer $k$ such that $G$ has a $k$-factor. Moreover, for any two bipartite graphs $G$ and $H$, we show $mp_f(G \square H) \geqslant mp_f(G)+\lfloor mp_f(H) \rfloor$, where $G \square H$ is the Cartesian product of $G$ and $H$.

A cut $C:=\partial(X)$ of a matching covered graph $G$ is a separating cut if both its $C$-contractions $G/X$ and $G/\overline{X}$ are also matching covered. A brick is solid if it is free of nontrivial separating cuts. In 2004, we (Carvalho, Lucchesi and Murty) showed that the perfect matching polytope of a brick may be described without recourse to odd set constraints if and only if it is solid. In 2006, we proved that the only simple planar solid bricks are the odd wheels. The problem of characterizing nonplanar solid bricks remains unsolved. A bi-subdivision of a graph $J$ is a graph obtained from $J$ by replacing each of its edges by paths of odd length. A matching covered graph $J$ is a conformal minor of a matching covered graph $G$ if there exists a bi-subdivision $H$ of $J$ which is a subgraph of $G$ such that $G-V(H)$ has a perfect matching. For a fixed matching covered graph $J$, a matching covered graph $G$ is $J$-based if $J$ is a conformal minor of $G$ and, otherwise, $G$ is $J$-free. A basic result due to Lovász (1983) states that every nonbipartite matching covered graph is either $K_4$-based or is $\overline{C_6}$-based or both, where $\overline{C_6}$ is the triangular prism. In 2016, we (Kothari and Murty) showed that, for any cubic brick $J$, a matching covered graph $G$ is $J$-free if and only if each of its bricks is $J$-free. We also found characterizations of planar bricks which are $K_4$-free and those which are $\overline{C_6}$-free. Each of these problems remains unsolved in the nonplanar case. In this paper we show that the seemingly unrelated problems of characterizing nonplanar solid bricks and of characterizing nonplanar $\overline{C_6}$-free bricks are essentially the same. We do this by establishing that a simple nonplanar brick, other than the Petersen graph, is solid if and only if it is $\overline{C_6}$-free.

We show that the perfect matching problem in general graphs is in Quasi-NC. That is, we give a deterministic parallel algorithm which runs in $O(\log^3 n)$ time on $n^{O(\log^2 n)}$ processors. The result is obtained by a derandomization of the Isolation Lemma for perfect matchings, which was introduced in the classic paper by Mulmuley, Vazirani and Vazirani [1987] to obtain a Randomized NC algorithm. Our proof extends the framework of Fenner, Gurjar and Thierauf [2016], who proved the analogous result in the special case of bipartite graphs. Compared to that setting, several new ingredients are needed due to the significantly more complex structure of perfect matchings in general graphs. In particular, our proof heavily relies on the laminar structure of the faces of the perfect matching polytope.

In deriving their characterization of the perfect matchings polytope, Edmonds, Lovász, and Pulleyblank introduced the so-called {\em Tight Cut Lemma} as the most challenging aspect of their work. The Tight Cut Lemma in fact claims {\em bricks} as the fundamental building blocks that constitute a graph in studying the matching polytope and can be referred to as a key result in this field. Even though the Tight Cut Lemma is a matching \textup{(}$1$-matching\textup{)} theoretic statement that consists of purely graph theoretic concepts, the known proofs either employ a linear programming argument or are established upon results regarding a substantially wider notion than matchings. This paper presents a new proof of the Tight Cut Lemma, which attains both of the two reasonable features for the first time, namely, being {\em purely graph theoretic} as well as {\em purely matching theory closed}. Our proof uses, as the only preliminary result, the canonical decomposition recently introduced by Kita. By further developing this canonical decomposition, we acquire a new device of {\em towers} to analyze the structure of bricks, and thus prove the Tight Cut Lemma. We believe that our new proof of the Tight Cut Lemma provides a highly versatile example of how to handle bricks.

In this paper we give a proof that the largest set of perfect matchings, in which any two contain a common edge, is the set of all perfect matchings that contain a fixed edge. This is a version of the famous Erdős-Ko-Rado theorem for perfect matchings. The proof given in this paper is algebraic, we first determine the least eigenvalue of the perfect matching derangement graph and use properties of the perfect matching polytope. We also prove that the perfect matching derangement graph is not a Cayley graph.

We introduce the simple extension complexity of a polytope P as the smallest number of facets of any simple (i.e., non-degenerate in the sense of linear programming) polytope which can be projected onto P. We devise a combinatorial method to establish lower bounds on the simple extension complexity and show for several polytopes that they have large simple extension complexities. These examples include both the spanning tree and the perfect matching polytopes of complete graphs, uncapacitated flow polytopes for non-trivially decomposable directed acyclic graphs, hypersimplices, and random 0/1-polytopes with vertex numbers within a certain range. On our way to obtain the result on perfect matching polytopes we generalize a result of Padberg and Rao's on the adjacency structures of those polytopes. To complement the lower bounding techniques we characterize in which cases known construction techniques yield simple extensions.

A popular method in combinatorial optimization is to express polytopes P, which may potentially have exponentially many facets, as solutions of linear programs that use few extra variables to reduce the number of constraints down to a polynomial. After two decades of standstill, recent years have brought amazing progress in showing lower bounds for the so called extension complexity, which for a polytope P denotes the smallest number of inequalities necessary to describe a higher dimensional polytope Q that can be linearly projected on P. However, the central question in this field remained wide open: can the perfect matching polytope be written as an LP with polynomially many constraints? We answer this question negatively. In fact, the extension complexity of the perfect matching polytope in a complete n-node graph is 2^Omega(n). By a known reduction this also improves the lower bound on the extension complexity for the TSP polytope from 2^Omega(n^1/2) to 2^Omega(n).

An extended formulation of a polyhedron $P$ is a linear description of a polyhedron $Q$ together with a linear map $π$ such that $π(Q)=P$. These objects are of fundamental importance in polyhedral combinatorics and optimization theory, and the subject of a number of studies. Yannakakis' factorization theorem [M. Yannakakis. Expressing combinatorial optimization problems by linear programs. {\em J. Comput. System Sci.}, 43(3):441--466 (1991)] provides a surprising connection between extended formulations and communication complexity, showing that the smallest size of an extended formulation of $P$ equals the nonnegative rank of its slack matrix $S$. Moreover, Yannakakis also shows that the nonnegative rank of $S$ is at most $2^c$, where $c$ is the complexity of any \emph{deterministic} protocol computing $S$. In this paper, we show that the latter result can be strengthened when we allow protocols to be \emph{randomized}. In particular, we prove that the base-2 logarithm of the nonnegative rank of any nonnegative matrix equals the minimum complexity of a randomized communication protocol computing the matrix in expectation. Using Yannakakis' factorization theorem, this implies that the base-2 logarithm of the smallest size of an extended formulation of a polytope $P$ equals the minimum complexity of a randomized communication protocol computing the slack matrix of $P$ in expectation. We show that allowing randomization in the protocol can be crucial for obtaining small extended formulations. Specifically, we prove that for the spanning tree and perfect matching polytopes, small variance in the protocol forces large size in the extended formulation.